Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Neither of those matter - and PPP is another robo poll with an automated voice that does not call cells phones. Marist, in theory at least, is more reliable. If I were a Romneyan, I would be very worried about the trend I see in early voting in IA. It shows Obama's vaunted ground game there is proving to be everything they said it would be.
Neither of those matter - and PPP is another robo poll with an automated voice that does not call cells phones. Marist, in theory at least, is more reliable. If I were a Romneyan, I would be very worried about the trend I see in early voting in IA. It shows Obama's vaunted ground game there is proving to be everything they said it would be.
Here they go again
I told you up thread Chuck Todd poo-pooed his own poll the EV is way off 32% in poll vs 18% officially
Well, I for one, never expected a debate bounce. I did expect that the polls would firm up with Obama holding on to slim margins in enough key states that he would win the election and that is exactly what is taking place. Obama does not need a bounce; he just can't weather much of a dip and that clearly is not in the cards at this point.
so these assumptions are being based off history? okay
In the Republican mind (il)logic always trumps science.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.