Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Here is my advice to conservatives, don't believe conservative news organizations because they traffic in fantasies.
You know the fantasies that tell conservatives that Mitt Rmoney was going to win in a landslide, that the Iraq War was going to be a rousing success, that the ACA healthcare law was in a death spiral, no body would sign up, it was unaffordable to consumers, that the latest conservative phony scandal is the one that's going to finally get President Obama.
How is someone being listed as voted in the Democratic poll book on the 24th mean anything?? Even if these people voted in the June 3rd Democratic Primary and attempted to vote in the June 24th GOPO runoff, they would be indicated as voting in the GOP book on the 24th, not the Democratic one.
And if they voted in the June 3rd primary it would have been marked in the column on the Democratic poll book. But so few did vote on the 3rd that that column was blank in most cases, and on the 24th, poll workers mistakenly filled in that blank column meant for the primary on the 3rd before realizing their mistake, crossing it off, and marking the correct column. If the voter had voted on the 3rd, that column wouldn't have been blank in the first place and those workers couldn't have made that mistake.
So all of these "irregularities" being reported happened because very few Democrats voted on June 3rd to begin with. And these are what are being held up by the Tea Party as illegal votes.
Again, watch the video in IC's link. Perry explains it quite well.
But hey, far be it from me to try to stop the Tea Party. The longer they drag this on, the more damage they do to the party.
How is someone being listed as voted in the Democratic poll book on the 24th mean anything?? Even if these people voted in the June 3rd Democratic Primary and attempted to vote in the June 24th GOPO runoff, they would be indicated as voting in the GOP book on the 24th, not the Democratic one.
No. They would be marked in the Democratic Poll Book for the 24th if they voted illegally because they voted Democrat on the 3rd. And there is a lot of evidence of exactly that having happened.
Here's an example of what SHOULD have been done but clearly wasn't district-wide (half the state) in the MS runoff:
Quote:
"...voter Annette Harper came to the precinct this afternoon looking to vote, but was told she couldn't vote because her name was on the Democratic poll book as voting in the June 3 Democratic primary"
No. They would be marked in the Democratic Poll Book for the 24th if they voted illegally because they voted Democrat on the 3rd. And there is a lot of evidence of exactly that having happened.
The name should have been referenced, but they wouldn't have actually signed into a Democratic pollbook when there wasn't even a runoff. No one should have been able to sign anything in the Democratic poll book on the 24th. The article you mentioned doesn't reference the facebook/twitter post that was earlier in the thread.
2 Senators per state, but they don't represent half the state each. Both represent the entire state....
LOL. What was it Perry said? "They're just going to look ignorant." You mean there aren't "U.S. Senatorial districts" in every state, half for one senator and half for the other????
You can't make this stuff up. If these are the brilliant minds that are trying to overturn an election I think Cochran is safe.
There already is evidence of indications of illegal votes.
The best thing to do is examine all the Democratic Poll Books in Cochran's district (half the state), count the number of illegal votes (not the stricken and initialed corrected mistakes),and let the truth determine the next course of action.
There already is evidence of indications of illegal votes.
The best thing to do is examine all the Democratic Poll Books in Cochran's district (half the state), count the number of illegal votes (not the stricken and initialed corrected mistakes),and let the truth determine the next course of action.
If you don't even know what a Senate election actually is, ahh forget it......
There already is evidence of indications of illegal votes.
The best thing to do is examine all the Democratic Poll Books in Cochran's district(half the state), count the number of illegal votes (not the stricken and initialed corrected mistakes)and let the truth determine the next course of action.[/b]
In Cochran's district. Half the state. Hahahaha! I guess he doesn't represent the other half of the state, huh? So which half is his? The top? The left? Which?
You're killing us here with your ignorance.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
