Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
True. And they used the same tactics. Go to blacks, use the race card and say Cochrans opponent is racist and wants to keep them from voting and everything else despicable that was said about him. Im just as disappointed in the human race who fall for such lies as those who carry them out.
And I think it's a fact at this point, they dont use those tactics, Cochran would've lost big.
McDaniel has an interesting past with neo-confederate groups.
Perry could only discount less than 300 of the 800 found by early yesterday as legitimate mistakes. He could not dismiss all of the double Dem votes as mistakes.
There were. And it is a problem.
Perry made no mention of 800, McDaniel's camp came up with that number. Just because they came up with that number, doesn't mean its actually true....
That makes no sense. If you are marked as voting in the Dem poll book, forget voting in this run-off election, no count necessary.
That's exactly it. They're finding page after page from Democratic Poll Books of people not in the 3rd Congressional district marked as voting on both June 3rd and the 24th. That's illegal.
That's exactly it. They're finding page after page from Democratic Poll Books of people not in the 3rd Congressional district marked as voting on both June 3rd and the 24th. That's illegal.
No. The question is how did they get marked on the 24th. It is of no advantage to both the Dems AND to the Cochran folks for those Dems to be marked on both the 3rd and the 24th for the Senator run-off election voting. In fact, it is a sure and guaranteed way to get those particular votes tossed out. And both the Dems and the Cochran folks know that beyond doubt.
The finger is obviously pointed to those conducting the election who allowed people to vote Republican that were ineligible to do so and who then marked them as having voted. Of course, the other possibility is that the markings were made after the fact without an actual vote being made by those ineligible people.
So the question remains. Who marked them on the 24th?
So you let them clean your houses, serve you, do your gardens,
build your freeways, pick your crops, and let them stay on this side
of the border to make things easier for you,
and then when they vote, you pretend they don't or shouldn't exist
or have any rights?
You people treat others like animals.
You don't even see it. That's what's so bad about your kind.
So you let them clean your houses, serve you, do your gardens,
build your freeways, pick your crops, and let them stay on this side
of the border to make things easier for you,
and then when they vote, you pretend they don't or shouldn't exist
or have any rights?
You people treat others like animals.
You don't even see it. That's what's so bad about your kind.
Sorry, we are talking about a different kind of illegal voters.
The finger is obviously pointed to those conducting the election who allowed people to vote Republican that were ineligible to do so and who then marked them as having voted. Of course, the other possibility is that the markings were made after the fact without an actual vote being made by those ineligible people.
It's a combination of things. For one, Cochran's campaign agitated the Black vote by using race-baiting flyers, etc., as we've already seen telling them McDaniel and the Tea Party wanted to take away their right to vote and imploring them to come out and vote for Cochran. And secondly, We have the allegation from McInnis (Hinds County's Election Coordinator for the Hinds County Democratic Party Executive Committee) alleging that Perry had asked the Dems to not switch Poll Books in the runoff and even though the Dems refused, Perry was successful in not switching Poll Books in some cases.
What would not switching the Poll Books accomplish? Those requesting a R ballot for the Senate runoff would be recorded in the R Poll Book on the 24th instead of the D Poll Book, so therefore would not appear as ineligible double voters in the D Poll Book:
Quote:
"McInnis alleged that Perry asked him and county Democrats not to share records of who voted in each primary on June 3. The practice--called "switching the books"--is where, heading into a runoff, Democrats and Republicans swap poll books that list which voters voted in the respective parties' recent primaries.
To start a primary, since Mississippi doesn't technically have party registration, Democrats and Republicans each begin with their own lists of all registered voters. As voters cast ballots, poll workers write "VOTED" next to the names of people who vote in their primaries. If the process heads to a runoff in either or both parties' primaries, the Democrats switch their books with Republicans and vice versa so poll workers in the runoffs can ensure nobody who voted in the Democratic primary votes in the GOP runoff and vice versa.
Names names and specific allegations, so don't balk at the publisher. After all, NONE of the MSM is looking this far into it.
There have also been allegations that runoff poll workers were told to let ineligible voters vote. I'm trying to track down exactly who alleged that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weichert
So the question remains. Who marked them on the 24th?
The poll workers did when those individuals voted on the 24th as has been the practice in MS for decades.
There's a ballot receipt voters must sign when they get their ballot. That may serve as further evidence when crosschecking the ineligible voters who voted on the 24th.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
