Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-12-2020, 06:26 PM
 
2,088 posts, read 1,973,589 times
Reputation: 3169

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcp123 View Post
I’m on 59 quite a bit. Coming in from points north and east, 59 is the way to get to Houston. I welcome the upgrades. Build it and they will come.
I realize that the post you are reaponding to is several months old, but the point of I-69 S from Houston is not get commuters from Wharton to Houston, it is to better connect the million plus people that live in the Rio Grand Valley cities of Brownsville, Harlington, and various suburbs to the rest of the country, as well as to facilitate trade to Mexico. It will also connect both Houston and the Rio Grande Valley to the almost half million people in the Corpus Christi area, and a branch will also run a little west to the Mexican border at Laredo. I-69 currently is complete from Indianapolis, IN to the Canadian border at Port Huron, MI. Other segments have been built, but aren't connected together yet. Eventually it will run from the Canadian to Mexican border, and will likely be a busy shipping route.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-12-2020, 08:19 PM
 
Location: South St Louis
4,364 posts, read 4,563,604 times
Reputation: 3171
I should add that Jefferson City is one of the very few US state capitals not directly served by an interstate highway. Long overdue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2020, 11:54 PM
 
Location: St. Louis City
589 posts, read 1,107,622 times
Reputation: 407
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1greatcity View Post
Interstate 72 ends abruptly in Quincy, Illinois. As if the city is some final destination. I have always felt it would make perfect sense to continue the highway across the Mississippi River and across northern Missouri to St Joseph, a 130,000 metro area.
In addition, the limited access highway (Missouri route 54) connecting I-70 in Columbia (a 265,000 metro) to the capital, Jefferson City (a 150,000 metro), needs to be upgraded and designated an interstate. Then, the highway should be extended to pass near Lake of the Ozarks, a hugely popular destination for many Missourians. Continuing south, the highway should link to Missouri route 65, which also needs to be upgraded to interstate status. This passes through the Springfield-Branson CSA (556,000 population). Why this was never accomplished has always been a mystery to me.
Interstate 72 ends in Hannibal with the the intention to move across the state on an upgraded US 36. It is also the KC-Chicago highway.

172 is a spur that goes around Quincy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2020, 12:06 AM
 
Location: St. Louis City
589 posts, read 1,107,622 times
Reputation: 407
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1greatcity View Post
I should add that Jefferson City is one of the very few US state capitals not directly served by an interstate highway. Long overdue.
Agreed - but I do not see this happening with pretty solid high access already with limited access, higher speed US 54 and US 63 connecting it to I-70.

Also - I often hear Missouri is the only state capitol with no interstate, so I will offer these two as other examples:

1) Dover, DE also has no official interstate access despite being between the more populous New Castle County and the resort communities of Sussex County (Rehoboth, Dewey etc).

2) South Dakota's of Pierre capitol has no interstate access.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2020, 02:14 PM
 
483 posts, read 354,201 times
Reputation: 1368
Some needed interstates I haven't seen mentioned:

1A. Upgrading US-301 corridor between Wilmington DE and Kings Dominon VA to interstate standards. That would provide a much needed bypass of Baltimore and Washington.

1B. From Kings Dominion the road can continue West of Richmond VA through Danville and to Greensboro NC.

The current interstate routing from Wilmington to Greensboro on 95/85/40 is 418 miles and can get bogged down in traffic. My proposal would be 65 miles shorter which is a full hour not accounting for traffic which would be considerably less for my new routing. It would also remove a lot of through traffic on 95, 85 and 40

2. Raleigh to Charlotte. The distance from downtown to downtown is 124 miles. The current 40/85 routing is 166 miles. There's not much between the two cities along the shortest route but this one seems like a no-brainer

3. Augusta GA - Macon GA - Columbus GA - Auburn AL - Montgomery (current 85) - Selma GA - Meridien MS. This one could be a useful bypass around Atlanta and provide another East/West connection in the Deep South.

4. Austin - Houston

5. Houston - College Station - Waco - Fort Worth

6. St. Louis - MSP via Iowa City, Cedar Rapids and Rochester

7. Portland OR, a western bypass from Wilsonville to Hillsboro to Vancouver WA including a new bridge over the Columbia

8. California - I505 extension from Fairfield/Vacaville to Antioch to Tracy

9. Sacramento eastside ring road - I80 at Citrus Heights - Fair Oaks - Rancho Cordova - Elk Grove - I5

10. CA 152 upgrade to interstate standards from Gilroy to Los Banos to Madera/Fresno
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2020, 04:42 PM
 
Location: DMV Area
1,296 posts, read 1,219,548 times
Reputation: 2616
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pavlov's Dog View Post
Some needed interstates I haven't seen mentioned:

1A. Upgrading US-301 corridor between Wilmington DE and Kings Dominon VA to interstate standards. That would provide a much needed bypass of Baltimore and Washington.
As a resident of Maryland, I definitely would be all for this. But this state is so full of NIMBY's who protest any sort of progress and development.



Quote:
2. Raleigh to Charlotte. The distance from downtown to downtown is 124 miles. The current 40/85 routing is 166 miles. There's not much between the two cities along the shortest route but this one seems like a no-brainer
I've always wondered why the route via 40/85 was picked, but Greensboro used to be a much more major city than Raleigh, and 40 used to end in Greensboro too. It's been long overdue to route a limited access highway along NC-27 east from Charlotte and US 1 North to Raleigh.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2020, 08:04 PM
 
Location: The City of Brotherly Love
1,304 posts, read 1,232,797 times
Reputation: 3524
This is probably a controversial opinion, but I-95 between Wilmington, DE and Bristol, PA. When I-95 was planned, it should have never touched PA; instead, it should run the length of the Jersey Turnpike between the George Washington and Delaware Memorial Bridges. Here's how I would correct that mistake:

1.) What is now I-95 between the PA/DE border and the Packer Avenue interchange in Philly, would be re-branded as I-495. I-495 between the existing interchange with I-95 and I-295 would remain, and the re-branded I-495 would be united with the existing I-495. The existing portion of I-95 between the PA/DE border and US 202 would also remain and be re-branded as I-395. This would allow for the demolition of what is now I-95 through Downtown Wilmington.

2.) The section of roadway between the Schudder Falls Bridge (PA/NJ border) and the Girard Avenue interchange would become I-295. This would allow for the removal of I-95 in South Philly, Center City, Northern Liberties, and part of Fishtown, as well as for the restoration of streets struck from the City Plan for I-95. The wound between Philly's neighborhoods and the Delaware River waterfront would finally be sutured with the removal of 95!

95 should have never had the opportunity to destroy neighborhoods in the Philadelphia area when it could have easily ran directly through the grassy hinterlands of South Jersey!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2020, 08:42 PM
Status: "Go Canes!!!!" (set 3 days ago)
 
Location: Planet Earth
8,804 posts, read 10,244,782 times
Reputation: 6833
Quote:
Originally Posted by biscuit_head View Post
I've always wondered why the route via 40/85 was picked, but Greensboro used to be a much more major city than Raleigh, and 40 used to end in Greensboro too. It's been long overdue to route a limited access highway along NC-27 east from Charlotte and US 1 North to Raleigh.
There's your answer, more business and commerce going on in Greensboro until RTP started to take off and Raleigh started seeing the growth of the technology sector in the 80's and 90's.

There's hardly a need to spend money for a direct route between the two or a 'limited access freeway'. It's not that long a trip anyways (I do it in under 3 hours frequently) and the 85/40 route essentially bypasses Greensboro. The money that would go towards such a project would be better spent for a high-speed rail connection instead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2020, 01:34 AM
 
Location: The Piedmont Triad
597 posts, read 449,694 times
Reputation: 850
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canes2006Champs View Post
There's your answer, more business and commerce going on in Greensboro until RTP started to take off and Raleigh started seeing the growth of the technology sector in the 80's and 90's.

There's hardly a need to spend money for a direct route between the two or a 'limited access freeway'. It's not that long a trip anyways (I do it in under 3 hours frequently) and the 85/40 route essentially bypasses Greensboro. The money that would go towards such a project would be better spent for a high-speed rail connection instead.



I agree.....no need for another highway connecting the two metros. Now that the construction between Concord and Salisbury is finally finished.... you have 120 miles of 6-8 lane freeway between Hillsborough and Charlotte. You can pretty much run 75-80 the entire stretch without a congested area to slow you down. The 64/49 combo is 4 lanes for alot of the stretch between Raleigh an Charlotte. Its pretty scenic in the fall once you past Asheboro.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2020, 05:38 AM
 
1,235 posts, read 944,208 times
Reputation: 1018
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilliesPhan2013 View Post
This is probably a controversial opinion, but I-95 between Wilmington, DE and Bristol, PA. When I-95 was planned, it should have never touched PA; instead, it should run the length of the Jersey Turnpike between the George Washington and Delaware Memorial Bridges. Here's how I would correct that mistake:

1.) What is now I-95 between the PA/DE border and the Packer Avenue interchange in Philly, would be re-branded as I-495. I-495 between the existing interchange with I-95 and I-295 would remain, and the re-branded I-495 would be united with the existing I-495. The existing portion of I-95 between the PA/DE border and US 202 would also remain and be re-branded as I-395. This would allow for the demolition of what is now I-95 through Downtown Wilmington.

2.) The section of roadway between the Schudder Falls Bridge (PA/NJ border) and the Girard Avenue interchange would become I-295. This would allow for the removal of I-95 in South Philly, Center City, Northern Liberties, and part of Fishtown, as well as for the restoration of streets struck from the City Plan for I-95. The wound between Philly's neighborhoods and the Delaware River waterfront would finally be sutured with the removal of 95!

95 should have never had the opportunity to destroy neighborhoods in the Philadelphia area when it could have easily ran directly through the grassy hinterlands of South Jersey!
If this was the case, then Interstate 476 would also cross the Delaware River into New Jersey to meet Interstate 95.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top