Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-08-2017, 09:43 PM
 
636 posts, read 393,036 times
Reputation: 714

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbgusa View Post
Flames can catch and burn other structures or people. Saliva cannot.
Speaking (and breathing) can transmit pathogens
There is no freedom of speech.

You should take your argument to the courts.
Seems like a real winner
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-08-2017, 11:17 PM
 
652 posts, read 340,899 times
Reputation: 1474
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
No, on the contrary, I make no assumptions.

Flag-burning constitutes a form of "symbolic speech" that is protected by the 1st Amendment. Even though it might be considered offensive by many, society's outrage is not justification for suppressing Free Speech.
And I maintain the right to stop the activity by any means I deem appropriate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2017, 11:53 PM
 
Location: Sun City West, Arizona
50,840 posts, read 24,359,728 times
Reputation: 32967
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annino View Post
And I maintain the right to stop the activity by any means I deem appropriate.
You are saying that you do not believe in the Constitution or the Supreme Court. I consider that to be far worse than burning a piece of cloth or plastic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2017, 07:02 AM
 
Location: New York Area
35,080 posts, read 17,043,458 times
Reputation: 30247
Quote:
Originally Posted by phetaroi View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annino View Post
And I maintain the right to stop the activity by any means I deem appropriate.
You are saying that you do not believe in the Constitution or the Supreme Court. I consider that to be far worse than burning a piece of cloth or plastic.
So you are saying that there is a right to burn a flag but not pour water on a burning flag? That's a very interesting debate proposition.

It is so typical that people assert a right to speech, but a right to shut down opposing speech. You see it on college campuses where people asserted a right during the 1960's to take over academic or administration buildings to oppose the Vietnam War. I didn't get the connection I didn't get back in those days when I was 11 or 12 years old, perhaps I was too stupid. Yet often the same or similar protesters asserted the right to shut down speakers such as Milton Friedman, a quality academic, deemed too far right. Or why do so many of the people believe it's OK to suppress free speech they don't like or "scares" them, see Syracuse cancels Israel film screening: Will offend ‘BDS faction,’ gender-studies faculty? Is certain kinds of non-violent free speech suppressible, whereas other violent expression OK because, after all, the objective is President Trump?

I'm very curious that I never got an answer when I asked previously.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2017, 09:29 AM
 
4,224 posts, read 3,021,937 times
Reputation: 3812
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annino View Post
And I maintain the right to stop the activity by any means I deem appropriate.
You do so at the risk of substantial fines and imprisonment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2017, 09:37 AM
 
4,224 posts, read 3,021,937 times
Reputation: 3812
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbgusa View Post
So you are saying that there is a right to burn a flag but not pour water on a burning flag?
Get your head straight There was a right for blacks to march across the Pettus Bridge. There was not a right for police to mass and brutally beat them for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2017, 09:42 AM
 
Location: Billings, MT
9,884 posts, read 10,981,966 times
Reputation: 14180
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pub-911 View Post
You do so at the risk of substantial fines and imprisonment.
Yes, as previously stated (many times) actions have consequences. It is up to the individual as to whether the actions are worth the consequences.
That applies equally to both sides of the debate.
Is being attacked by someone who considers himself a patriot worth expressing your political viewpoint by burning a flag?
Is the arrest, fines, and jail time worth stomping a protester that made you VERY angry?
Personally, this Vietnam veteran and military retiree says a resounding "NO!" to both questions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2017, 09:57 AM
 
4,224 posts, read 3,021,937 times
Reputation: 3812
Your personal opinions are 100% irrelevant. Just like those of every other individual. These are not matters that any individual has the right to decide. You do have the right to express your opinions, but no one has a right to frustrate or beat you over them. This is part of the price we all pay for living in society such as the one you seem to think you once protected.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2017, 05:22 PM
 
Location: Near Manito
20,169 posts, read 24,340,157 times
Reputation: 15291
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pub-911 View Post
Your personal opinions are 100% irrelevant. Just like those of every other individual.
Including yours? Then the rest of your post can be safely ignored.

See how that works?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2017, 08:19 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,177,123 times
Reputation: 21743
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbgusa View Post
Why do so many of the snowflakes believe it's OK to suppress free speech they don't like, see Syracuse cancels Israel film screening: Will offend ‘BDS faction,’ gender-studies faculty?
I wouldn't know, since I'm not a special snowflake.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbgusa View Post
Is certain kinds of non-violent free speech suppressible, whereas other violent expression OK because, after all, the objective is President Trump?
I didn't vote for Trump (or Hilliary), but I do support some of his policies. I don't have any issues with protests or protestors. If they want to enjoin non-violent or violent protests, that's on them. I'm free to engage them or ignore them as I see fit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:38 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top