Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
1.) He will come back in here to tell us all how wrong we were. In this fairytale land, the owner apologized immensely for any stress he caused the OP and offered to compensate him for time wasted. He then offered him a position as Co-CEO for the company and promptly bought him a yacht, which is where he is posting his next response from.
1.) He will come back in here to tell us all how wrong we were. In this fairytale land, the owner apologized immensely for any stress he caused the OP and offered to compensate him for time wasted. He then offered him a position as Co-CEO for the company and promptly bought him a yacht, which is where he is posting his next response from.
Aw man I was so excited to hear an update to this and........crickets!
I bet it's because the man took him out on his yacht after their discussion and is prepping him for his new position today (once he recovers from all the booze, sex, and drugs).
1.) He will come back in here to tell us all how wrong we were. In this fairytale land, the owner apologized immensely for any stress he caused the OP and offered to compensate him for time wasted. He then offered him a position as Co-CEO for the company and promptly bought him a yacht, which is where he is posting his next response from.
2.) He won't come back.
I'd like to see eastcoastguyz post his 2 likely scenarios again. I think they got deleted when the thread was locked.
I'd like to see eastcoastguyz post his 2 likely scenarios again. I think they got deleted when the thread was locked.
I don't think reposting something that a mod deleted is likely to go over well.
As for the OP, I don't think the entire thing was a Troll thread. It likely happened as he said originally, but the events that happen in no way mean the CEO owes the OP anything. I'm not sure if crashing the family event thing was real or not, that's where things seemed to get really ridiculous.
In other words, the source you originally quoted does not fit your argument, so now you want to change the source.
Sorry, that's not the way that it works. I've already proven according to your definition from your source that you posted that I received an offer.
Posting other links to other definitions that contradict what you originally posted just demonstrates that you are not standing by the source that you chose to post.
Anyone can post an endless supply of contradictory sources with the aim of eventually running into a source that supports an irrational argument.
Which legal representative of the company delivered an offer to YOU? Having an unaffiliated party deliver a message to you is not the same as make YOU an offer. What legal authority does your friend have to obligate his cousin's company?
Be sure to let us know how the confrontation goes. We are waiting with baited breath for the conclusion.
I think he will post here again. He'll either blow it out of proportion and say the guy decided to hire him after speaking with him, or we'll get another 30 plus pages of rants about the injustice of it all.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
