Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Minnesota > Minneapolis - St. Paul
 [Register]
Minneapolis - St. Paul Twin Cities
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-19-2010, 05:11 PM
 
72,971 posts, read 62,554,457 times
Reputation: 21872

Advertisements

Maybe Minneapolis should do alot of in-fill building.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-19-2010, 05:17 PM
 
Location: MINNESOTA
1,178 posts, read 2,705,497 times
Reputation: 505
Well I asked this about 2 pages ago, but does MPLS have much open space?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2010, 06:12 PM
 
335 posts, read 675,462 times
Reputation: 105
we need more highrise residential buildings in the city but as we all know people complain about that because they dont want a highrise in there neighborhood for whatever reason. Its a city and if you dont like tall buildings and dense neighborhoods that are growing and have no way to go but up move to the burbs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2010, 08:06 PM
 
Location: Minneapolis, MN
10,244 posts, read 16,364,120 times
Reputation: 5308
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kid Cann View Post
Well I asked this about 2 pages ago, but does MPLS have much open space?
There is tons of space to build up. Also, there are still alot of places that are undeveloped or underdeveloped. Several are mentioned in the Rybak article on the last page.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2010, 09:08 PM
 
72,971 posts, read 62,554,457 times
Reputation: 21872
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slig View Post
There is tons of space to build up. Also, there are still alot of places that are undeveloped or underdeveloped. Several are mentioned in the Rybak article on the last page.
Then why not develop those spaces?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2010, 09:12 PM
 
10,624 posts, read 26,724,400 times
Reputation: 6776
Some of them are being developed; others face neighbor opposition (because of fears of traffic, etc.), etc. I assume that once the economy improves that there will be significantly more activity. I know of many pockets of land, even in prime areas like Uptown, that are sitting empty (some with "coming soon" signs) because the demand just isn't there right now for much new construction.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2010, 06:21 AM
 
72,971 posts, read 62,554,457 times
Reputation: 21872
Quote:
Originally Posted by uptown_urbanist View Post
Some of them are being developed; others face neighbor opposition (because of fears of traffic, etc.), etc. I assume that once the economy improves that there will be significantly more activity. I know of many pockets of land, even in prime areas like Uptown, that are sitting empty (some with "coming soon" signs) because the demand just isn't there right now for much new construction.
I am aware that Mpls and St. Paul have been losing population since the 1950's, and at the same time, I don't think it is for the same reasons as Detroit, Cleveland, Pittsburgh, and other cities in the "rust belt" region. I figure those couldn't be the reasons. What would be nice is to develop those areas. I read today that the era of the "McMansion" is coming to an end, and maybe one can cash in on that somehow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2010, 08:36 AM
 
Location: Carver County, MN
1,395 posts, read 2,658,251 times
Reputation: 1265
Quote:
Originally Posted by pirate_lafitte View Post
I am aware that Mpls and St. Paul have been losing population since the 1950's, and at the same time, I don't think it is for the same reasons as Detroit, Cleveland, Pittsburgh, and other cities in the "rust belt" region. I figure those couldn't be the reasons. What would be nice is to develop those areas. I read today that the era of the "McMansion" is coming to an end, and maybe one can cash in on that somehow.
Actually, it seems that the populations of Mpls and St. Paul have pretty much bottomed out around the 1990 census and have been steady or actually growing slightly since then, so at least we are not losing people any more like Detroit and Cleveland etc. The economy of the metro area as a whole is very strong compared to the economies of many rust belt cities, so that helps out alot. I think a lot of the growth has to do with the resurgance in residential development in and around downtown Minneapolis. The downtown area has seen the construction of quite a few condos in the past decade. I think the population has been ticking up in the uptown, northeast (old St. Anthony) and areas around the light rail line. There is an interactive map somewhere (I think the city's web site) where you can actually see the population changes by neighborhood. Suburban development has definatly slowed down quite a bit since the housing bust, but than again so has condo development. However it seems that although population growth in the outer ring suburbs and counties have come to a crawl in the latest estimates, the populations of the central cities and Hennepin and Ramsey counties have actually picked up pace.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2010, 06:09 PM
 
Location: Cleveland bound with MPLS in the rear-view
5,509 posts, read 11,870,451 times
Reputation: 2501
I think of it like inflating a balloon......push, push, release, push, push, release. The downturn in population in nature's "exhale" when growing or even staying afloat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2010, 09:49 PM
 
Location: Minneapolis
23 posts, read 59,664 times
Reputation: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by west336 View Post
I think of it like inflating a balloon......push, push, release, push, push, release. The downturn in population in nature's "exhale" when growing or even staying afloat.
You can think of it that way, but I don't think losing 1/3 of a city's population is a natural ebb and flow of city growth. It's more like some extreme white flight.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Minnesota > Minneapolis - St. Paul
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top