Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-28-2020, 07:46 AM
 
Location: NYC
7,301 posts, read 13,518,729 times
Reputation: 3714

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by dcb175 View Post
So it seems like "leftist" is now synonymous with scientific and developed nation consensus, at least here on the NYC city-data sub. While I may partly agree that we're past tipping points that can no longer be reversed, the conspiracy theory echo chamber of inaction over the past two decades has gotten us into this mess, and now that we're in it the message is shifting to "well, nothing we can do now."

The fact that DT pulled out of Paris, has opened up federal land for more extraction, and has turned the EPA from an actual functioning regulatory body for our protection to a political puppet show is his way of rubbing our noses in the mess that he has already made on the carpet.

But hey, at least he's not HC, amirite?
It doesn't matter so long as he's Owning The Libs (Tm). It's all that matters to them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-28-2020, 07:52 AM
 
2,446 posts, read 1,219,565 times
Reputation: 5359
Question for all the climate scientists on this thread?


What should be the normal climate of the Earth?


Is it dinosaur era? pre-dinoasaur, post dinosaur, ice age, little ice age....100 years ago?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2020, 07:55 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn, New York
5,464 posts, read 5,712,176 times
Reputation: 6098
Quote:
Originally Posted by HandsUpThumbsDown View Post
Maga Multiple choice:

1. Climate change isn't real anyway
2. Destroying the most important city to the world economy is cool because it's fun to Own The Libs!
3. *Shrug* who cares it wouldn't be that bad
4. There's nothing that can be done anyway, there's no action to mitigate natural disasters, so let's do nothing !
If this study is so important that it will lead to 'destruction' of the city, why doesn't the city fund it? If the city has other priorities, such as Office of Nightlife, so does the Federal government. Even the State is not in a hurry to fund it either. At some point you have to take ownership of your own local problems and not wait for the Orange Daddy to come and fix it for you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2020, 07:56 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn, New York
5,464 posts, read 5,712,176 times
Reputation: 6098
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcb175 View Post
So it seems like "leftist" is now synonymous with scientific and developed nation consensus, at least here on the NYC city-data sub. While I may partly agree that we're past tipping points that can no longer be reversed, the conspiracy theory echo chamber of inaction over the past two decades has gotten us into this mess, and now that we're in it the message is shifting to "well, nothing we can do now."

The fact that DT pulled out of Paris, has opened up federal land for more extraction, and has turned the EPA from an actual functioning regulatory body for our protection to a political puppet show is his way of rubbing our noses in the mess that he has already made on the carpet.

But hey, at least he's not HC, amirite?
Why isn't your state funding it? Please write to your governor.
Do you believe this is important or not? It is important enough that you want it, but not important enough that you would pay for it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2020, 07:59 AM
 
Location: NYC
7,301 posts, read 13,518,729 times
Reputation: 3714
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gantz View Post
If this study is so important that it will lead to 'destruction' of the city, why doesn't the city fund it? If the city has other priorities, such as Office of Nightlife, so does the Federal government. Even the State is not in a hurry to fund it either.
It would stand to reason that the federal government should play some role in shoring up its most important city. And since the federal government already has tons of money in Nyc resiliency projects post Sandy , that their involvement would continue.

However to just trash something half way through for a tiny pittance of money is ... Short sighted and stupid.

But high five for owning the libs !!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2020, 08:02 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn, New York
5,464 posts, read 5,712,176 times
Reputation: 6098
Quote:
Originally Posted by HandsUpThumbsDown View Post
It would stand to reason that the federal government should play some role in shoring up its most important city. And since the federal government already has tons of money in Nyc resiliency projects post Sandy , that their involvement would continue.

However to just trash something half way through for a tiny pittance of money is ... Short sighted and stupid.

But high five for owning the libs !!!
If its a tiny pittance of money, why doesn't the city fund it? As far as I know, the city is literally contributing $0 to this study.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2020, 08:08 AM
 
Location: NYC
7,301 posts, read 13,518,729 times
Reputation: 3714
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gantz View Post
If its a tiny pittance of money, why doesn't the city fund it? As far as I know, the city is literally contributing $0 to this study.
Are you faulting them for that? Years ago when it began the city should have said "oh you know what let's allocate some funds to this just in case we elect a president who decides Owning The Libs is a policy goal and cuts the funding "

The city contributes billions more in Federal tax revenue than it receives . to say they aren't contributing enough For an in-progress study to continue is BS.

But hey. NYC doesn't vote for the Own The Libs party so let's do this petty ****. All good!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2020, 08:10 AM
 
Location: NYC
20,550 posts, read 17,705,684 times
Reputation: 25616
I just don't believe in any BS "study" programs that are nothing but cookie jar for the local officials to send their relatives and friends more money. If you do an audit or investigation, all these studies including actual construction work all have ties to politicians through consultation fees with kickbacks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2020, 08:11 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn, New York
5,464 posts, read 5,712,176 times
Reputation: 6098
Quote:
Originally Posted by HandsUpThumbsDown View Post
Are you faulting them for that? Years ago when it began the city should have said "oh you know what let's allocate some funds to this just in case we elect a president who decides Owning The Libs is a policy goal and cuts the funding "

The city contributes billions more in Federal tax revenue than it receives . to say they aren't contributing enough For an in-progress study to continue is BS.

But hey. NYC doesn't vote for the Own The Libs party so let's do this petty ****. All good!
At any point the city can pick up the tab. Again, this is not a priority for the Feds, if it is for the city, they can always pay for it, ANY TIME. The Feds are looking at us and see that we are funding other, what they deem more 'frivolous' things, so they are re-routing the money, since we have so much.
If someone is installing golden toilets in their bathroom, they can't cry that they don't have enough money for food. The Feds have other more urgent priorities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2020, 08:15 AM
 
Location: NYC
7,301 posts, read 13,518,729 times
Reputation: 3714
Quote:
Originally Posted by vision33r View Post
I just don't believe in any BS "study" programs that are nothing but cookie jar for the local officials to send their relatives and friends more money. If you do an audit or investigation, all these studies including actual construction work all have ties to politicians through consultation fees with kickbacks.
Any public project has studies. It's your assertion that 100 pct of them are corrupt and 0 pct of them should occur?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:



Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top