Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
But with the health care bill, it was okay to not read the 2700 pages because 0bama said it was good and you just believed him. Now, someone opposing Palin says her emails will show how bad she is and, without reading the material again, you are prepared to believe it.
Nothing like a predisposition to the outcome you desire.
BTW, is it now fair game to read the emails of all in the political arena, or just those you oppose?
You want to show us where I said I am prepared to believe "it"?
It's fair game to read anything that gets released through the FOIA. Happy?
Toast? Toast from what? She will not be POTUS regardless of any emails anyway. As for calling her a hillbilly, why? Do you know who hillbillies are? Are you a hillbilly? As for toast, toast is good, goes great with butter and strawberry jam
BTW, is it now fair game to read the emails of all in the political arena, or just those you oppose?[/quote]
Amen brother, could you imagine if all EMAILS from all the sitting governors, senators, and politicians in general had to be released to the public, better than half would be run out of office, which would be a good thang.
But with the health care bill, it was okay to not read the 2700 pages because 0bama said it was good and you just believed him. Now, someone opposing Palin says her emails will show how bad she is and, without reading the material again, you are prepared to believe it.
Nothing like a predisposition to the outcome you desire.
BTW, is it now fair game to read the emails of all in the political arena, or just those you oppose?
Good point, it is really important that we see e-mails from Palin, there may be something in there to make her look stupid. However it is completely trivial that we know what Elena Kagan's role in Obamacare was!
You want to show us where I said I am prepared to believe "it"?
Virtually every post you make on the subject says it far better than a mere declaritory statement.
Quote:
It's fair game to read anything that gets released through the FOIA. Happy?
And isn't it interesting which emails and concerning which individuals get selected? Once again, political predisposition rears it ugly head. Anything from the Fed, regardless of which side, is suspect.
News organizations mobilized teams of reporters and even recruited online volunteers to scan more than 24,000 pages of e-mails from Sarah Palin that were released on Friday, prompting some critics to accuse the news media of overkill at best and vigilantism at worst.
Greta Van Susteren, the Fox News host, asked if all the fuss amounted to a “media colonoscopy,†and pointed to comments from her readers who asked whether news organizations had devoted such energy to the 2,800-page health care overhaul bill that passed last year.
If only they were as zealous and diligent getting to obama's records.
And isn't it interesting which emails and concerning which individuals get selected? Once again, political predisposition rears it ugly head. Anything from the Fed, regardless of which side, is suspect.
Opinion only with no dog in this hunt: but all this fuss seems to originate with the publics desire and perhaps overwhelming need to guage the integrity of someone who would be crowned "king" of the hill. Why then is it not deemed fair play to have everyone put under that same microscope?
I don't get it at all; you want good people to run for these high positions but then you go about requiring them to walk naked over a bed of hot coals and sacrifice their first born to show their committment to the race. Does it not seem logical that; given this requirement to abase yourself in public, only completely retarded or wrongly motivated people would then apply for the job with all the sensible ones abstaining from this display of public villification?
History has proven that good and even great leaders have had "feet of clay". What's the big deal with these stupid e-mails? If we were summarily judged by what we've written on this forum as an example, we're probably all "toast".
Reason would say that you should be correct. However you failed to factor in the huge number of people with a room temperature IQ that think otherwise.
Reason would say that you should be correct. However you failed to factor in the huge number of people with a room temperature IQ that think otherwise.
You just can't fix stupid.
I am curious, which e-mail do you find damaging?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
