Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Sounds creepy. But, we have given up on TV a long time ago in our house. There is too much violence, sex and propaganda pushed by the progressive left who control the programming, any complaints about are typically responded to with a reminder that the TV can be controlled by parents. So I guess, that is my advice. Don't like it? Turn it off. Or another option is to watch it with your children. It may open the door for a good discussion of your values.
Ever try learning the meaning of the very simple word C-H-O-I-C-E ? What is so difficult about that simple concept?
What is so difficult about understanding the inalienable right to life endowed by one's Creator, especially for those who quite literally are so innocent that they have no way to voice their choice from inside the womb?
When a woman wants the life growing inside of her it is a baby, when she does not, it is a "choice". How does that double standard work exactly?
The time for choice is with the practice of responsible controception control and fertility management prior to sexual intercourse, not choosing to terminate an inconvenient life.
Given the described content of the ad I suspect that human life is portrayed as something respected and the mass murder of humans is shown as a morally reprehensible act. Do you have a problem with that, seriously?
If they do run it, which I doubt, stations do have their owns rights, incase you didn't know, but if they do it will only backfire on them, the outrage would kill their bid on the spot.
I think that a video should show the civilian victims of bombs, like in Iraq and Afghanistan, the mass murder of humans is shown as a morally reprehensible act.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,389,283 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal
What is so difficult about understanding the inalienable right to life endowed by one's Creator, especially for those who quite literally are so innocent that they have no way to voice their choice from inside the womb?
Nothing. What is so difficult about understanding a fertilized egg is not a human being?
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal
When a woman wants the life growing inside of her it is a baby, when she does not, it is a "choice". How does that double standard work exactly?
1) A fertilizaed egg IS NOT a baby.
2) The double standard here is those who preach LESS governmengt in our lives yet are only too happy to call for more when it suits their agenda.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal
The time for choice is with the practice of responsible controception control and fertility management prior to sexual intercourse, not choosing to terminate an inconvenient life.
No method of contraception is 100% effective. So you'd punish those who have it fail?
You're the one alleging Obama has taken a pro-abortion position. Please supply just ONE example where he's EVER stated women SHOUL have abortions. Until then we can only take your statement for the hyperbolic deliberate mis-statement that it is.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,389,283 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Visvaldis
I think that a video should show the civilian victims of bombs, like in Iraq and Afghanistan, the mass murder of humans is shown as a morally reprehensible act.
Once people are ex-utero it just doesn't seem to bother the right what happens to them.
What is so difficult about understanding the inalienable right to life endowed by one's Creator, especially for those who quite literally are so innocent that they have no way to voice their choice from inside the womb?
/snip
That's assuming the woman in question is a religious person. What about those who are not? What about those who think that a zygote is not alive, but merely potential for life, much the same way a sperm is?
That's assuming the woman in question is a religious person. What about those who are not? What about those who think that a zygote is not alive, but merely potential for life, much the same way a sperm is?
We have dozens of threads on abortion, this is about a superbowl ad. You are taking the thread way off-topic. Ditto to the rest as well. If you don't think the ad is appropriate, change the channel.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
have abortions. Until then we can only take your statement for the hyperbolic deliberate mis-statement that it is.
