Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-30-2012, 05:14 PM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,396,474 times
Reputation: 8672

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
Um, if you wanted to give a tax break, the cheapest way to do it would be a lump sum personal income tax rebate.

Cutting the FICA rate was the stupidest thing to do, because, in the first place, it costs a helluva lot of money to reprogram all of the software to deduct the correct amount for FICA from payroll.

In case you missed it, and obviously you did, to extend the FICA tax holiday into 2012 cost even more money for employers, tax accounts, tax attorneys, tax preparations specialist and payroll processing companies (like ADP) to reprogram the software.

Obama did it the most expensive way you could possibly do it.

Not only that, but it siphoned money out of the General Fund which is why there are hiring freezes in federal agencies and offices, and few contracts were awarded to private firms, which resulted in job losses.

That was just brilliant.

Laughing at the superior intellect...


Mircea
Do you support corporate jet tax breaks?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-30-2012, 05:15 PM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,758,413 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
This is an amazing change in right wing philosophy. Now tax cuts aren't good nor bad.

Tax cuts are only good nowadays (since 2008) when they're deemed to be "stimulative." Wow....that's a new one.

So a tax cut is only stimulative when it's a BIG cut in taxes, aye?

Just say what the hell you mean and quite bullsh*tting around. Tax cuts are good for the wealthy, and bad for the non-wealthy. It's what you mean, but just won't say.

Damn...you guys act as if we're pulling teeth here.
Yikes, I answered your question, you either don't understand it or don't accept it. However it's the truth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2012, 05:16 PM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,861,032 times
Reputation: 4585
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
Good? Tax cuts are neither good nor bad. However certain tax cuts stimulate the economy. Clearly a minuscule cut isn't stimulative.
Payroll tax holiday amounts to about $100 billion stimulus.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2012, 05:18 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,509,263 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis1979 View Post
Then beg your Republican representation to take him up on the offer
Lloyd Doggett is my rep and he's a Dem
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2012, 05:21 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,509,263 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
This is so odd? Why is the left anxious to pick a fight with 54% of the population? These folks said the tax cut was worthless.
They have to defend Obama and blame all the problems on Bush.
It's towing the party line. They don't care what most of America thinks..they have to defend their party.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2012, 05:29 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,215,209 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
They have to defend Obama and blame all the problems on Bush.
It's towing the party line. They don't care what most of America thinks..they have to defend their party.
Gimme a break.

If President Obama would've come out swinging against the Payroll tax cut, the Republicans would be campaigning as we speak that he's RAISING taxes, and you know it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2012, 05:34 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,509,263 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis1979 View Post
Do you support corporate jet tax breaks?
Exactly what type of tax breaks does the corporations get for having jets ?
Besides the normal depreciation I'm assuming.

Or are you just repeating what's been told to you by the MSM ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2012, 05:35 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,509,263 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
Gimme a break.

If President Obama would've come out swinging against the Payroll tax cut, the Republicans would be campaigning as we speak that he's RAISING taxes, and you know it.

ROFL..that payroll tax break was his idea..tacked onto the Bush cuts extension.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2012, 05:37 PM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,758,413 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
Payroll tax holiday amounts to about $100 billion stimulus.
Its miniscule, and the tax payers understand this. Cutting a penny from the gas tax would be be a huge cumulative number but would have zero economic impact.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2012, 05:40 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,954,445 times
Reputation: 5661
The purpose of this post is to inject a few facts:

1) If 54% don't feel the effect of the payroll tax holiday, that means that 46% do, and that's a large number.
2) The OP asks "didn't the Dems learn anything from the stimulus?" The answer is , 'yes.' The stimulus, such as it was, has been analyzed by the CBO and private economists with the conclusion that it raised GDP from where it was. The problem with the stimulus was scale. It was $788 billion, 40% tax-cuts of minimal effectiveness, spread out over two-years and trying to negate a 6% drop in GDP on a $14 trillion economy.

Thus, to the chagrin of people who want Obama to fail, the stimulus worked. It just was too underpowered to undo the massive drop.

3) While the anti-Obama group snicker at the effect of a payroll tax holiday, "The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) shows that a payroll tax cut is one of the most effective tax cuts in stimulating demand for goods and services in a recessionary economy — not as effective as direct spending on unemployment benefits but still far more effective than high-end income tax rate reductions." link So, if we filter out the partisan foolishness and only address facts, we see that the payroll tax holiday is indeed stimulative.

Of course, the anti-Obama crowd doesn't want the economy to improve because their only objective is to leave Obama with the worst economy so their electoral chances are better -- never mind that Americans will suffer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:06 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top