Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Maybe he will call Andrew Breitbart's widow and children and apologize on behalf of the left-wing pundits and the language they are using.
So you see no difference between Mr. Breitbart's very public persona and ongoing public smear campaigns and this young woman's testimony as a private citizen before Congress?
SOOO much sex? Let me explain how the pill works. Regardless of whether you have sex once a month, once a week or once a year you need to take it every day. They aren't like viagra that you pop each time you have sex. She also clearly made a point that the coverage of this medication for controlling ovarian cysts should be covered. Do you really hate women that much? Turn back the clock to 1950's and get the little ladies out of the fancy universities right? Clearly, someone doesn't want to be reasonable.
Clearly.
And that someone is you.
Telling someone who runs a hospital that treats women with broken bones, burns, heart attacks, cancer, etc that they "hate women" if they don't provide contraception is not reasonable. Telling someone who provides women with a world class education that they "hate women" if they don't provide contraception is also not reasonable. Telling someone who runs a charity that provides needy women with clothes, food, and other necessities that they "hate women" if they don't provide contraception is also not reasonable.
Sorry son, but as a penis holder you absolutely DO NOT get the right to judge a woman for her reproductive health choices.
Do you even know how BC works? Pills aren't like viagra or condoms for christ's sake!!!!
You take 1 (ONE) pill a day whether you are getting laid or NOT. The more you take, doesn't mean the more it works.
Personal responsibility huh? If women have to pay for their pills, then I fully believe that ALL women (married or not, fertile or not, ALL WOMEN!) should protest sex with men and strike.
If you misogynist humans can't understand primary vs secondary uses for hormonal medicine, then maybe some time w/o women and with "rosie" might do you some good.
I just thank the heavens that my husband is not this obtuse or ignorant or simpleminded to think being on bc=being a loose ***** who likes to f**k.
And as for someone who can't afford bc sending them to my house; eh, if I could afford more be my guest; I would rather pay for bc than for viagra or unwanted pregnancies and ruined dreams.
I'm so sick of women screaming on the one hand "leave me alone. I can make my own choices. It's MY body. I'm equal to a man". Then on the other, they're soooo helpless they have to get someone else to pay for their birth control?
Telling someone who runs a hospital that treats women with broken bones, burns, heart attacks, cancer, etc that they "hate women" if they don't provide contraception is not reasonable. Telling someone who provides women with a world class education that they "hate women" if they don't provide contraception is also not reasonable. Telling someone who runs a charity that provides needy women with clothes, food, and other necessities that they "hate women" if they don't provide contraception is also not reasonable.
All you liberals who applaud this move by Obama........You tell me where does this regulation stop? You people keep applauding these types of over reaching by the government...where do you want the line drawn? Or hey, maybe you dont think it should stop. But if you do, keep letting reach and reach and reach. Wait until they cross your "line" if you even have one. We'll see what you say then.
I see it wasn't you. I thought it was the person who posted the S word that was answering me. I really don't pay that much attention to who posts what and thought it was the other person. Sorry. I focus on content and not on posters.
I usually can't tell anyone who posts what, just what has been posted.
No apology for reaming me out? How gracious of you!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkatt
You are right, BCP = $15.00 - $50.00 per month. That leaves between $400.00 - $820.00 in costs that aren't accounted for. It's not for Dr visits, that's covered by their health insurance.
[/indent]AND, what everyone forgets, the INSURANCE isn't going to lose money, they are going to raise the rates for women, (different needs, different rates), and the women will STILL be paying for their birth control.
The insurance companies are not complaining about this one. Believe me, if it were a problem for them, we'd hear about it! The "increase" would be infintesimal to them.
You will supply the ham sandwiches because you will still make a profit. You are comparing apples and oranges.
There are plenty of other medicines that can HELP in the prevention of cancer, reduce anemia, reduce cysts and prevent potential surgeries.
And supplying BC will make companies money as well. If women don't get pregnant, then no maternity leave, no birth costs, no additional people to cover on a plan. If they take bc for other uses, then they can work w/o pain, w/o excessive bleeding, no lost time at work due to surgery, etc....
Name me a few of these medicines then please. Cause I trust my OB/GYN when he tells (or his NP when she tells me) that bc is the easiest and BEST way to prevent those things. Take one lil bc pill to prevent me from taking massive amounts of pain meds, iron supplements, etc... or take those pills instead. Simple decision IMO.
All you liberals who applaud this move by Obama........You tell me where does this regulation stop? You people keep applauding these types of over reaching by the government...where do you want the line drawn? Or hey, maybe you dont think it should stop. But if you do, keep letting reach and reach and reach. Wait until they cross your "line" if you even have one. We'll see what you say then.
Wonder how they'd like it if mandatory coverage for mandatory ultrasounds gets written in? Wonder if the WH would make a personal call to someone getting ridiculed for arguing for that?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
