U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-13-2012, 03:16 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,894 posts, read 13,668,034 times
Reputation: 3949

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
You mean 57 states.
When the best you can do is reference a slip of the tongue from 4 years ago, that's a pretty good sign that you have nothing substantive to complain about.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-13-2012, 03:20 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,894 posts, read 13,668,034 times
Reputation: 3949
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truth Exposer View Post
FancyFeast5000, specifically which republican officials in Hawaii are you refering to?
Not to speak for Fancyfeast, but the obvious answer is Governor Linda Lingle and Director of Health Dr. Chiyome Fukino.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2012, 03:32 PM
 
8,561 posts, read 5,453,979 times
Reputation: 1172
Ooops. they have returned. moths to the flame. Thanks HD. Governor and health director was my answer. Didn't remember the names.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2012, 03:56 PM
 
8,561 posts, read 5,453,979 times
Reputation: 1172
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truth Exposer View Post
Governor Lingle had no authority to access Hawaii's Dept of Health records on anybody and she had no authority to speak publicly about any citizens vital birth records due to Hawaii privacy laws. Do you concur?
If it's a problem for you, take it up with her and whatever appropriate law enforcement agency and/or the President. It was his birth certificate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2012, 04:25 PM
 
8,561 posts, read 5,453,979 times
Reputation: 1172
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truth Exposer View Post
The abstract of Obama's vital records has been found to be a forgery under the authority of a law enforcement department. That conflicts with the Hawaii Dept of Healths statements attesting to the authenticity of Barack Obamas vital records. Until then, Hawaii's Dept of Health statements can't be relied on until they come up with the microfilms of Obama's original vital records, if any.
I know full well what "under the authority of law" means, and the investigation you refer to was no authoritative investigation by law enforcement. I will rely upon the legality of the State of Hawaii having verified the birth certificate.

Btw, how do you know that Obama didn't give the Governor permission to access his birth certificate? Therefore her actions would not have violated any law. You know that people can authorize other people to look at their private records. Usually they sign a records release form which designates the specific individual who is allowed to review the records.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2012, 04:42 PM
 
8,561 posts, read 5,453,979 times
Reputation: 1172
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truth Exposer View Post
I know because the Hawaii privacy statutes prevent any release of any information pertaining to vital records. Allegedly Director Fuddy had to waive Obama special permission to access his own records. Former Director Fukino would have never been unable to do that with Lingle. Democrat Governor Albercrombie couldn't get access when he wanted to resolve the issue. Now, getting on the subject of the investigation. Those investigators had full backing of the Maricopa County Sheriffs Department just like other investigations have been conducted in other cases.
I know a little about the justice system and how it works.

No, the so-called investigation you're referring to did not have official backing by the Sheriff's Department; the Sheriff just used his name. It was basically a private investigation which someone who is Sheriff of Maricopa County lent his name to, and the finding were worthless, therefore, no legal action has been taken based on those findings.

At any rate, I wouldn't be using that Sheriff's Department's name as any indication of good investigative work, considering how many cases they completely failed to investigate and have gotten into trouble over for being so "inefficient."

How about a cite for the specific Hawaii law you're relying upon?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2012, 04:51 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,894 posts, read 13,668,034 times
Reputation: 3949
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truth Exposer View Post
I am sorry but my posting is the factual truth.
That statement is also a complete and utter lie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2012, 04:53 PM
 
18,302 posts, read 10,393,778 times
Reputation: 13370
Gotta ask after reading miles and miles of these threads: What the h*** difference does it make now?

What would be an acceptable resolution given proof positive he's NOT a citizen?

Do you now sit and go through a year or two of your upper and lower houses debating a lengthy process of defining the constitutional statement of what constitutes a "citizen"?

Do you put an election on hold till the outcome is clear?

Do you take every piece of legislation, all bills, that he signed and render them null and void to be argued all over again?

Do you sue his azz to reclaim the salary and expense's of his tenure?

Do you seriously want to hash this on and on for another 4 years to then discover long after he's left office that he was ineligible to have occupied the big chair? So what?

To what end would anyone carry this on after the man as been in the Whitehouse for nearly a full term?

If he's been doing the job at the behest of the majority of your population this long; how would the integrity of your nation be upheld if it's discovered after all this time that, your congressional leaders lied, various officials have lied, your supreme court lied?

Bejeesus folks; given the width and breadth of the conspiracy to place him in the position to have run for office; if indeed he isn't eligible you'd better have another revolution as virtually everyone holding higher office must have been complicit to some degree. What you gonna do; throw them all in jail and start over?

Your countries foreign policy, war in Afghanistan, N.Korea, Iran, China, yes even that stupid Chavez gonna all sit patiently at the breakfast table until you get this chit all sorted out?

Cripes think of the way you'd look to the rest of the world while your nation flounders around slinging every senior beuraucrat out of his office.

Who the hell would you trust to mind the store til you hear from another phony Warren commission?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2012, 04:58 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,894 posts, read 13,668,034 times
Reputation: 3949
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truth Exposer View Post
Governor Lingle had no authority to access Hawaii's Dept of Health records on anybody and she had no authority to speak publicly about any citizens vital birth records due to Hawaii privacy laws. Do you concur?
Of course not.

She was the Governor of the State and formally tasked her Director of Health (a person with both authority to access and speak on the vital records) to check and report back to her. In announcing the results of that investigation she was in fact explicitly meeting the repeated demands of Birthers.

Of course, once the Birthers got an answer they didn't like, they did a completely hypocritical about face and began to whining that the privacy laws that they had been attacking as objectionable for months were suddenly now sacrosanct and had been violated.

As you are doing here.

Whether you agree she had the authority or not, she has spoken on the issue. And of course, Chiyome Fukino spoke too... something you pathetically and transparently ignore.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2012, 04:59 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,894 posts, read 13,668,034 times
Reputation: 3949
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truth Exposer View Post
No. Barack Obama is a Citizen of the United States. It is settled law.
I have provided you with citations to a dozen cases that explicitly agree with me.

You have none that agree with you.

I win.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top