A child's life in a "gay" household (soldier, regime, troops)

[Trackwatch]

Originally Posted by helenejen

Sorry. I fixed it.

Thank you, normally I wouldn't care, but in this case.

[raison_d'etre]

Originally Posted by helenejen

Funny, I was just looking at this article today that has pictures of wrestlers from the 1980s. Very disturbing as some of them are brothers!!

Remember the 80s? These cringe worthy photos of glammed-up wrestlers bring the tackiest era back in graphic detail | Mail Online

My brothers and I still take photos like this....are you saying these outfits aren't in style anymore.

[helenejen]

Originally Posted by raison_d'etre

My brothers and I still take photos like this....are you saying these outfits aren't in style anymore.

Definitely not what I was saying!! Let's see the pics!!!!!

[0marvin0]

Originally Posted by Kenneth-Kaunda

A short skirt is not appropriate for a man to wear because it symbolises a vagina.

The exposed opening that a skirt provides is a subliminal indicator for the male - that of an orifice.

I would advise you to never visit Scotland.

[Kenneth-Kaunda]

Originally Posted by Trackwatch

Wow, that is a unique connection .... What about Kilts? Are they not "skirts"?

a kilt or gladiator style 'skirt' etc.. may have had specific reasons in their time and place.

However, you will not see a lot of men wearing these outfits in the local shopping mall nowadays.

Today, a woman wears a skirt as a sexual symbol - and notice here I use the word 'woman', ie: an adult.


So, a normal man, will see a skirt on a woman and be sexually attracted in a subliminal or overt manner.

[gizmo980]

Originally Posted by 0marvin0

I would advise you to never visit Scotland.

Or any of the Polynesian Islands, Hawaii, India, etc... and some of these places have the manliest men in the world! At least in my opinion.

But we're really getting off-track here, since this thread isn't about men in skirts (or short shorts either). Not all gay people dress outlandishly, in fact most DON'T. Even walking around the Castro District here, the majority will be dressed appropriately by general standards - particularly those who have children. Just because they're gay, that doesn't mean they lack common sense or parenting skills.

[Kenneth-Kaunda]

and of course, underneath a kilt there is usually another solid garment, not a pair of lace panties, so clearly not the same.

[gizmo980]

Originally Posted by Kenneth-Kaunda

and of course, underneath a kilt there is usually another solid garment, not a pair of lace panties, so clearly not the same.

How do you know what men OR women have under their garments? Why am I suddenly having flashbacks to the movie "Splash?"

@2:18

Splash - (1/13) - YouTube

[quigboto]

Originally Posted by stargazzer

even "committed" homosexual relationships display a fundamental incapacity for the faithfulness and commitment that is axiomatic to the institution of marriage.

Even "committed" heterosexual relationships display a fundamental incapacity for the faithfulness and commitment that is axiomatic to the institution of marriage. What else would you call a 50% failure rate?

[Kenneth-Kaunda]

at least a hetero marriage has the ability to produce children, in which case the marriage has more chance of staying together - ie: 'for the sake of the children'