Quote:
Originally Posted by hamellr
No.. Americans can't afford to LIVE on low wage jobs.
|
That's amusing, because 6 Billion other people have no problem at all.
Like I was just telling someone else, the 2nd time I lived in Romania 10-12 years ago, the average Romanian made $300/month.
You can't live off of that? Romanians did. What, you thought everyone was homeless or lived in cardboard boxes? Nope. They rented apartments -- $25/month to $50/month for a nice one bedroom.
You can live on low wage jobs.....and you'll learn how to do that, because there is no alternative for you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hamellr
Even discounting all the "luxuries," that people begrudge the poor having in this day and age. Rent prices have gone up drastically all over the country, food prices have gone up, the cost of gas has gone up. Even the rhetoric has gone up.
|
So what?
I never ate meat 3 meals a day seven days a week until I went into the Army. Nobody ate meat 7x a week in 1960s/1970s America except the wealthy. Even when we did eat meat, it was cow tongue, beef/pork liver, pork brains, hog maws, beef tripe and stuff like that.
You need to learn how to eat. And shop. You're all lazy. You don't buy grated cheese, you buy the cheaper block of cheese and grate it yourself. You don't buy orange juice, you buy the cheaper oranges and juice it yourself.
You don't buy chicken breast tenderloins. You buy a whole freaking chicken. It takes me a whole entire whopping minute to take a chicken and cut it up into two legs, two boneless thighs, two boneless breasts, two chicken wings and parts for soup stock.
So I pay $0.88/pound instead of $5.89/pound.
You people are so spoiled you don't even know how to live. You waste $1000s each year on disposable things and then throw a temper tantrum because you don't have any wealth. Well, how stupid is that?
You throw away $5.49 each week on Chlorox disposable orange-scented kitchen wipes, because paying $0.99 for 3 dish-clothes that you can wash and re-use over and over and over
is beneath your dignity.
"It costs blah, blah, blah, blah Dollars to raise a child." Well, stop throwing away money on disposable diapers, and use cloth diapers instead. Stop buying Osh-Kosh and Nike and other name-brand expensive clothing for your infant.
You people are the least competent consumers on Earth.
And so what if rents have gone up. Do what everyone on Earth does and has done for centuries....share.
I thought you Liberals were all into sharing and stuff.
If I ran HUD there wouldn't be any HUD. It would be eHousing.com. You fill out a questionnaire, say how much you can afford for housing and how many people you are, and then you get matched up with another person or family and then landlords contact you and make the arrangements.
You can share living space. It's not illegal; it's not a crime.
You have people with college degrees working minimum wage jobs and living with mummy and daddy, while some 18 year old high school drop out with three kids who will never contribute anything to society ever gets her own personal private apartment at tax-payer expense.
Yeah, that makes a helluva lot of sense.
You take all them single unwed mothers 28 and under living in their own personal private housing at tax-payer expense and you stick them in a Quonset huts (they hold 40 people) --- problem solved -- and they even got free day-care.
If they don't like living in a Quonset hut, then here's a novel idea -- get a freaking job or emigrate from the US to somewhere else.
The bottom line is that the poor are going to have to take action so that they are not as much of a leech and a drain on society.
The poor can have food or Dish Network, but not both. That's just the way it is.
Realistically...
Mircea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bideshi
If they have no other citizenship, where would you deport them to?
|
Who cares? As long as they are not taking up space and wasting resources in the US.
Put your welfare offices at airports.
When people come in, you just give them a brown bag lunch, a $10 bill, and a parachute, they go out the back door and board a C-130, and when it fills, it takes off and dumps them over Somalia. Or Afghanistan or Myanmar or some other hell-hole.
Same with your criminals. You can load up a bus, drive them out to an airport, and off they go.
If they don't like it, then my suggestion would be not to commit any crime.
And the welfare pukes, I guess either they'll learn how to save money, live frugally, share living accommodations and make sound financial decisions--- or they won't.
Do you have a few $TRILLION in cash sitting around that no one knows about? Because if you don't, then you're going to have to adjust your attitude toward crime and welfare, and even more so for standard of living.
People who do not have Time-Warner Cable are not "living in poverty."
Sensibly...
Mircea
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluesjuke
Not to mention the tax subsidized apartments I'm finishing up building in Dallas where there are Club owner's, Mercedes, BMWs, late model Camaros, two big screen TVs in one apartment and on and on.
Makes one sick to see it firsthand.
This is not stuff left over from when things were good or better, it's brand new items.
|
I was flaming Liberal until I had to install cable TV in the "projects."
I worked for the damn cable company and couldn't even afford cable TV, and here these people are loafing around doing nothing, with free housing, free food, free medical insurance, free everything --- these were typically single unwed mothers -- and living with them was some guy with a decent job and of course since everything is free for him as well so he has a pocket full of money and can afford to buy a BMW or Mercedes or Cadillac and have the big screen TV and the big fancy stereo and nice clothes.
It didn't take me long to see that the Liberal view is Fantasyâ„¢ not Realityâ„¢.
Commiserating...
Mircea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gtownoe
That's about one of the dumbest comments I've heard all day. There's a huge correlation between poverty and crime rates in this country.
|
No, there isn't and you cannot prove it.
The fact that someone who is "impoverished" (snicker) committed a crime is not proof that they committed the crime because they were impoverished. They would have committed the crime no matter what the circumstances.
Obviously you're clueless as to what constitutes a "crime of passion."
Delinquently...
Mircea