Quote:
Originally Posted by ChocLot
I thought Zimmerman was the MMA fighter? Why is this all of a sudden attributed to Trayvon?
|
He took a few MMA classes. That is not the same thing as an MMA fighter or even a competent fighter.
I was on my high school's wrestling team... Over ten years ago. And although I understand grappling better than most people, I don't have enough confidence that being a mediocre wrestler over a decade ago and follow-up by over ten years of sedentary jobs would sufficiently prepare me to defend my life in similar circumstances.
I can also say with confidence that the 17 year old version of myself would almost certainly beat the living s--t out of the 29 year old version of myself. I was heavier, stronger, more active, more aggressive, and I was more accustomed to physical violence. I haven't been in a fight since I was 18 or 19* and I have no business getting into physical confrontations nowadays.
*Okay. Not exactly true. I did get into a fight about two years ago at the birthday party of a coworker. There was this guido who was being really obnoxious. He kept taking his shirt off to show off his abs and kept hitting on this chick in front of her boyfriend. He was just being a complete ass. After several hours of listening to his bragging I made a smartass comment to response to something he said to this chick I was talking to. He took offense and grabbed the collar of my shirt and went to hit me. I grabbed him back and we ended up in struggle and I managed to get him into a chokehold and choke him until he lost consciousness. I immediately let go once he went limp. He came to within seconds and was pretty sheepish for the rest of the night and later came up to me to apologize. I don't count that one as fight because the entire thing was over in about fifteen seconds, I didn't get hit, I didn't hit him, and the only bruising was of the guido's ego. I also admit that I was very lucky. I didn't expect the violent reaction I got from him and if it weren't my basic knowledge of chokeholds and my vestigial wrestling skills, I would have been in a fight with a younger (about 23 or 24) and stronger man and that night could have ended very badly for me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zimbochick
I'm wondering if the people hating on Martin would feel the same way if he had shot Zimmerman in self-defense if he had been legally carrying a weapon?
|
If Zimmerman was on top of Trayvon and punching him in the face and slamming Trayvon's head into the concrete and Trayvon got a hold of Zimmerman's gun (or his own if he had one) and shot Zimmerman. I would have no complaints about Trayvon's actions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChocLot
Let's assume you are correct. We don't know how long Trayvon continued to beat Zimmerman. Your argument would hold more weight if we knew for sure how long the fight (and supposed life threatening beating) lasted.
|
Like I said on the other thread. A fight does not need to last very long for someone to be seriously injured. According most police officers, self-defense experts, and martial artists that most street fights last less than a minute and is often over in less than 30 seconds. It's not like the movie
They Live where two guys can pummel each other for seven minutes straight. I saw CCTV footage where one man assaulted another outside of a nightclub. He walked up behind a guy and punched him in the back of the head and started punching and kicking the guy while he was on the ground. The entire attack lasted about twenty seconds and the victim ended up with brain damage and he was only punch about three or four time and kicked seven times. That is all it took to partially paralyze that man.
Although considering some of the comments on these threads I am fully expecting at least one commenter to refer to that particular man as a p---y for being so easily brain damaged.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChocLot
Here is where we differ:
I am basing my feelings off of what we know happened: Zimmerman spotting Trayvon, deciding to leave his car (with a gun) and follow Trayvon.
I am NOT basing my opinions off of what happened once they met up.
What are you basing Martin's poor judgements off of?
|
Actually, that makes a lot of sense that you not basing your opinions off of what happened in the vital moments that lead up to the shooting. It explains why your opinions are so stupid. It is because you are not basing your opinions on the most important facts and events that lead up to the shooting.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zimbochick
So you're saying Martin was justified in defending himself from a stranger following him in the dark?
|
Possibly. If he thought that Zimmerman was trying to assault him in some way and felt that an attack was imminent and he decided to chose the terms of the fight than Trayvon wouldn't have been in the wrong if he thought, "Okay. There is this guy following me and it is clear that he is following me. I don't know who this guy or what he wants. I just have a bad feeling about this guy. He could be a serial killer for all I know. I could probably take him, but he is pretty stocky and if he gets a hold of me or strikes first he might win and who knows what might happen then. I'll just lay low and if comes by here I will clock him first and not leave it to chance and call for help if it comes to that."
But that still doesn't make Zimmerman's actions wrong even if Trayvon's actions were motivated by a genuine concern for his safety. It just means that Zimmerman was the victim of mistaken identity and was defending himself against the consequences of that mistake.
Quote:
Originally Posted by juppiter
All the Zimmerman supporters can just go ahead and go to a KKK meeting OK? Not gonna tolerate it any more.
|
Yes. Because the Klan would absolutely love a guy who is half-Hispanic and a quarter black and was raised Catholic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldogdad
I've answered everyone of your questions you just didnt like the response. YOUR CULTURE HAS A PROBLEM killing themselves. Legalizing drugs wont help if that's your idiotic answer.
Causes not symptoms, thats how you treat the cancer that is killing your race.
|
I somewhat disagree. A lot of the violence in the black community has to drug dealers and gangs fighting over turf. Legalizing drugs would have a pretty dramatic effective on the murder rate in the black community the same way that the repeal of Prohibition had on the murder rate in the Italian and Jewish communities.
However, that still wouldn't deal with many of the murders in the black community that stem over bulls--t beefs that escalate into aggravated assault and murder on a routine basis.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChocLot
Do you believe OJ was innocent?
|
No.
Nor the cops in the Rodney King case.