Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
"It thus clearly appears that, by the law of England for the last three centuries, beginning before the settlement of this country and continuing to the present day, aliens, while residing in the dominions possessed by the Crown of England, were within the allegiance, the obedience, the faith or loyalty, the protection, the power, the jurisdiction of the English Sovereign, and therefore every child born in England of alien parents was a natural-born subject unless the child of an ambassador or other diplomatic agent of a foreign State or of an alien enemy in hostile occupation of the place where the child was born.
III. The same rule was in force in all the English Colonies upon this continent down to the time of the Declaration of Independence, and in the United States afterwards, and continued to prevail under the Constitution as originally established."
1) U.S. Secretaries of State DID in fact determine that those born in the U.S. to non-permanently domiciled alien fathers were NOT U.S. citizens.
2) Gray DID in fact predicate the U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark ruling on the fact that WKA's parents were permanently domiciled in the U.S. at the time of WKA's birth.
Then why is Obama the President of the United States? And why have birthers lost every single case they've ever filed?
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent
1) U.S. Secretaries of State DID in fact determine that those born in the U.S. to non-permanently domiciled alien fathers were NOT U.S. citizens.
And they were wrong. Once the Wong Kim Ark decision corrected them they stopped making that mistake.
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent
2) Gray DID in fact predicate the U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark ruling on the fact that WKA's parents were permanently domiciled in the U.S. at the time of WKA's birth.
No, Gray did not. Gray explicitly declared domicile to be irrelevant.
It is not important where Bam Bam was born. His father was a British subject. He is not a natural citizen and therefore is not eligible to be President.
What's funny is, this crap is still number 1 with the left, and the right has stated yea...well, we have said that most on the right don't agree with it and much ado about nothing...but the left continues....
The right brings up wiener, that left states, well we have said most on the left don't agree with it and much ado about nothing...and the thread disappears into the air....
Think about it....
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
