Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 24 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,557 posts, read 16,548,014 times
Reputation: 6041
Advertisements
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma
Hey look at that....this time you managed to incorporate multiple bullet points into one response!
Liberal/Obama Supporter Auto Response Protocol™
1. The source isn't valid
2. That's racist
3. GOP obstruction
4. But...but...but George W. Bush
5. Haters gonna hate
6. Repeat 1,2,3,4 and/or 5 as needed then insult the opposition for failing to support this great man, declare victory, and move on
Instead of slinging the typical Obot hogwash you could actually try to refute some of the points made in the OP. Can you do that? That's rhetorical BTW....
Neither you or the article made any points.
Susan Rice being compared to Typhoid Mary is moronic as Mary actually started the outbreak. Comparing her to Rice would mean Rice killed the men in Benghazi.
Russia gave him an out and Reid gave him an out.
He need to just shut up and walk away quietly and think twice before opening his mouth with threats of military invasion.
Cons don't want America to succeed - they just want Obama to fail.
This is an illness both sides suffer from. I seem to remember the last president going through the same crap his last 2 years in office. If you cry foul for one side, you have to cry foul on all sides; otherwise it's just hypocritical babble.
I'd say it's more like: No matter which side is in power, the people are damned either way.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Workin_Hard
Kerry was for the bombing. Before he was against it.
Nobody can deny this guy is a political hack! The Swift Boat Veterans did a Snowden on him, yet he's the one in charge of our foreign image... which sucks BTW!
The Syrians are now discussing turning over their chemical arsenal. Would this have happened without a U.S. military threat?
We'll never know will we because the first thing out of Obama's mouth was a dare and then a threat to invade.
Some Nobel Peace Prize holder we got there.
And the terrorists that we are supporting do have chemical weapons.
What about them ? Do they get to keep them ?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
