Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Since when are non-citizens guaranteed a right to that? They're not. Otherwise the U.S. Border Patrol wouldn't be able to turn any foreigner back once they're on U.S. soil. They'd all have to have a trial to determine whether they're guilty of illegal entry before they're turned away.
All modern countries have such laws. Else anyone could simply abduct someone from another country and abuse them.
So why is the Border Patrol turning foreigners already on U.S. soil away at the Obama Admin's discretion?
Have you read your constitution yet? Have you read your bill of rights yet? If you haven't, why are you still talking to me?
I don't know why you think deporting illegal immigrants is not following due process. I'm not interested in why you think deporting illegal immigrants is not following due process either.
I don't know why you think deporting illegal immigrants is not following due process.
I'm not talking about deporting them. I'm talking about turning them away on the U.S. soil portion of the border without due process. They're foreigners present on U.S. soil and are not entitled to the right to due process. They're told to turn around and go back to the country from which they crossed the border.
I'm not talking about deporting them. I'm talking about turning them away on the U.S. soil portion of the border without due process. They're foreigners present on U.S. soil and are not entitled to the right to due process. They're told to turn around and go back to the country from which they crossed the border.
Turning people away from a border if they don't have the necessary paperwork or whatever is part of due process too.
If you think foreigners aren't due due process, you haven't done as instructed and read your own constitution and bill of rights. You are very bad at following instructions. I suspect you know you're wrong but are desperate to pretend your defense of torture has merit. Or maybe you just don't understand the issue and are incapable of fact checking by reading your own bill of rights. Strange that someone defending the use of torture to interrogate someone is not interesting in learning facts. Verifying info is clearly anathema to right-wingers who support torture because Muslims upset them and make them sad.
Turning people away from a border if they don't have the necessary paperwork or whatever is part of due process too.
Based on what? Some entering the country illegally without paperwork are permitted to stay (in direct violation of federal law), others aren't. Where's the due process in that?
Based on what? Some entering the country illegally without paperwork are permitted to stay (in direct violation of federal law), others aren't. Where's the due process in that?
Fifth Amendment. I have no reason to think you understand what constitutes "due process" in any given situation since you don't even know to whom it applies. Also, your tangent is irrelevant. Also, it's a tu quoque argument so it's worthless. You should've stopped to read your own bill of rights instead of continuing to fail with every word you type.
Anyway, it's interesting to know you believe I can be shot for speeding in the US because I'm not guaranteed due process of law by your own constitution. How embarrassed are you that I know your country's rules better than you?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.