Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-10-2015, 04:06 PM
 
18,983 posts, read 9,082,774 times
Reputation: 14688

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
Because the states only portion is contradicted by other parts of the law, and the CBO scoring, etc etc. Basically the supreme court will look at the intent. And the intent of congress seems clear.

Its not the "clear language" that you seem to think when other parts of the law contradict it.
And you have Republicans like Olympia Snowe reaffirming that it was most likely "inadvertant language" that was "never part of our discussion at any point." Snowe also said, "Why would we want to deny peopel subsidies? It was not their fault if their state did not set up an exchange."

Republicans know this is a bogus lawsuit, and so does everyone else with a working brain.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-10-2015, 04:07 PM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,081 posts, read 51,252,674 times
Reputation: 28329
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
Yep, the majority of people who showed up, not who can actually vote....
the more that show up the more the dems will win. The last thing Republicans want to see is a large voter turnout. Speaking of majorities, I saw today that less than 4 in 10 Americans want to repeal subsidies for Obamacare. The majority of us think they should be retained. Pubs got a problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2015, 04:17 PM
 
46,307 posts, read 27,124,387 times
Reputation: 11135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
the more that show up the more the dems will win. The last thing Republicans want to see is a large voter turnout. Speaking of majorities, I saw today that less than 4 in 10 Americans want to repeal subsidies for Obamacare. The majority of us think they should be retained. Pubs got a problem.

LOL....link....

Dems have a problem, they promised, provided, not it maybe taken away...how does that have anything to do with the repubs?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2015, 04:25 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,231,797 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
Many did, because you say they did not....is not the truth....or are you really reid?
Based upon what you said, I don't think you read the discussion you replied to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2015, 04:39 PM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,081 posts, read 51,252,674 times
Reputation: 28329
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
LOL....link....

Dems have a problem, they promised, provided, not it maybe taken away...how does that have anything to do with the repubs?
The dems have absolutely no Plan B. None. They will be content to let the Pubs dangle in the wind if millions lose coverage. Don't forget the the first signees onto Ocare were the sickest and the neediest. The public will be very upset as the news is filled with stories of kids and people dying from cancer unable to complete their treatments. Everyone will know someone who has been hurt by the decision. Insurance markets could collapse in many states and premiums, everyone's will soar just in time for the elections next year. The liberal media will loudly trumpet the stories. The Dems will blame the Republicans and it will stick. It has started already with Obama making speeches about how this is an easy case that should never have been heard by the SC. Never, except for politics (i.e. Republicans), that is. Be careful what you wish for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2015, 04:40 PM
 
27,158 posts, read 15,330,669 times
Reputation: 12078
Quote:
Originally Posted by triple8s View Post
I can only wonder if Obama even read ACA before he put it out there. He was a lawyer and a professor, and assuming he actually read it, apparently he missed "established by the state". Can only wonder how many eyes were on these four words and didn't catch it.



A case about four words, with mammoth implications

Now Obama wants to poo-poo the legal wording as a "mistake" and chastises SCOTUS for adhering to the law and their petty interpretation (according to him) of "established by the state". This not something he can fix with a pen by editing ACA at will.

Read the article and see the devastation that could result if Obama loses this one.




Yet if Obama loses on this it changes the Law not one iota.
He'll just have to follow it now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2015, 04:43 PM
 
46,307 posts, read 27,124,387 times
Reputation: 11135
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Based upon what you said, I don't think you read the discussion you replied to.
Yep, you are right and I apologize...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2015, 04:46 PM
 
46,307 posts, read 27,124,387 times
Reputation: 11135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
The dems have absolutely no Plan B. None. They will be content to let the Pubs dangle in the wind if millions lose coverage. Don't forget the the first signees onto Ocare were the sickest and the neediest. The public will be very upset as the news is filled with stories of kids and people dying from cancer unable to complete their treatments. Everyone will know someone who has been hurt by the decision. Insurance markets could collapse in many states and premiums, everyone's will soar just in time for the elections next year. The liberal media will loudly trumpet the stories. The Dems will blame the Republicans and it will stick. It has started already with Obama making speeches about how this is an easy case that should never have been heard by the SC. Never, except for politics (i.e. Republicans), that is. Be careful what you wish for.

Grubers will agree with you.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2015, 05:27 PM
 
Location: Tip of the Sphere. Just the tip.
4,540 posts, read 2,770,924 times
Reputation: 5277
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
The problem is there is no way Hillary will be trusted or allowed to do anything concerning health care.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pollyrobin View Post
And you know what. She won't support a single payer system, just like Obama wouldn't,
because they are owned and paid for by the Insurance Companies.

Those bell and whistles the Insurance Companies tout, are frankly, bull****, when it comes
down to the nitty gritty of "real" health care delivery and cost containment.

"As I recall, this was his categorical response, that he thinks single-payer is the way to go," Young said. "Over the years, there's been ever more edging on his part, to the point where what he has now is a multitiered program, but it ain't single-payer."

Obama statements on single-payer have changed a bit | PolitiFact


Hillary Clinton on single payer | Physicians for a National Health Program

"You know, I have thought about this, as you might guess, for 15 years and I never seriously considered a single payer system." - Hillary Clinton

Q: And if the choice is a single-payer system, that’s fine by you?

MRS. CLINTON: You know, I think that would be highly unlikely. I think that, you know, there’s too many bells and whistles that Americans want that would not be available in kind of a bare-bones Medicare-like system but I think it’s important to have that competition.

I don't think either of ya'll are entirely wrong. Hillary is a corrupt, self-interested political coward above all else. I wouldn't trust her to take out my garbage unless she was benefiting somehow.


But there lies the key. Hillary's most memorable legacy from her time as first lady is the ill-fated HillaryCare debacle. It still chaps her ass to this day... and given the opportunity she will wipe it from history. What better way than to SUCCESSFULLY get HillaryCare put into law?

This will require a catalyst to get started though... a CRISIS, that is. And if the SCOTUS sides with the Republicans... then she has been handed just that. And she'll ride it into the Whitehouse.

So frankly I HOPE the Supreme Court sides with the Republicans. I HOPE they render the Affordable Care Act ineffective and unworkable. Because our Republican congress will NOT fix it. And millions of Americans suddenly without healthcare? People DYING due to lack of funds? The GOP will be tarred and feathered over this. The peasants will get out their pitchforks. Heads will roll.

The ONLY hope Republicans have should the Supreme Court side with them is to pass a TEMPORARY fix. And they may well do that- setting up a bi-annual fight just like the debt ceiling. And we know how well THAT worked out for the Repugs.

But that's all a pipe dream. Realistcially... if I were betting on it (and I'm not- I'm not really affected either way)... I'd expect the SCOTUS to side with Obama. And the whole issue fizzles in a blaze of mediocrity.

To me this looks an awful lot like a lose/lose scenario for the GOP.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2015, 05:35 PM
 
Location: USA
31,086 posts, read 22,101,630 times
Reputation: 19101
Quote:
Originally Posted by PoppySead View Post
I doubt they will do anything to fix this mess, but, the republicans are in a tough spot as well. I hate them all personally. I think less is more.
How ever it ends I'm sure it will hit us in the wallet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:48 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top