Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-27-2015, 08:21 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,187,535 times
Reputation: 18824

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pruzhany View Post
Correction for bolded words (IMO): WW1 and European meddling.
Fair enough sir.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-27-2015, 09:03 PM
 
Location: Itinerant
8,278 posts, read 6,272,923 times
Reputation: 6681
Firstly on the OP I thought this wasn't so much a conspiracy theory as common sense.

Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
I think the hornets nest aspect is overblown. Before the oil and WW2, it was a relatively peaceful part of the world. Western meddling has made a mess of the region. Still, not all of the M.E. is bad. I have friends that work over there and they love it.
Well we were meddling prior to WW2, really since WW1 where Britain tinkered with the Arab revolt from the Ottoman Empire. During the partition of the Ottoman empire, the Middle East was partitioned along artificial lines forming more traditional countries. The US just got in on the French/British action post WW2. British allies of the time were among others Abdulaziz ibn Saud (does that name sound familiar?) another being Abdullah bin al-Hussein who was the King of Jordan and grandfather of Hussein of Jordan, and great grandfather of Abdullah II of Jordan, and Faisal who was king of Iraq during it's time as a monarchy from 1921-1958.

Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
The M.E. needs to be free to develop organically. It would be painful and bloody, but outsiders can't fix it. That much I know.
True, but the issue is that the world depends on a resource that is bountiful in the Middle East, there is a sense of universal irony in that fact. If we let them figure it out for themselves, so we can have consistent supplies of the resource it will disrupt the supply of the resource while they figure it out and we can't have that, if we maintain consistent supply of the resource, they'll never be able to sort it out for themselves and it will disrupt the supply of the resource.
__________________
My mod posts will always be in red.
The Rules • Infractions & Deletions • Who's the moderator? • FAQ • What is a "Personal Attack" • What is "Trolling" • Guidelines for copyrighted material.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2015, 09:06 PM
 
Location: Southern California
15,080 posts, read 20,469,320 times
Reputation: 10343
Quote:
Originally Posted by knowledgeiskey View Post
For the longest, the idea of the US meddling in the Middle East for oil has been regarded as an anti-war conspiracy theory. This is the narrative from right side of the spectrum. But in reality, is it really a conspiracy theory? I mean many historians and political scientists have been contending that US foreign policy in the MENA is indeed driven by oil interest.
Everyone knows, or should know, this.

Iran, Iraq, Libya, Saudi Arabia, Russia, Nigeria, Venezuela, among a few others, are regularly in the news. What do they have in common?

OIL.

[thicker than blood]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2015, 10:30 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,187,535 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gungnir View Post
Firstly on the OP I thought this wasn't so much a conspiracy theory as common sense.



Well we were meddling prior to WW2, really since WW1 where Britain tinkered with the Arab revolt from the Ottoman Empire. During the partition of the Ottoman empire, the Middle East was partitioned along artificial lines forming more traditional countries. The US just got in on the French/British action post WW2. British allies of the time were among others Abdulaziz ibn Saud (does that name sound familiar?) another being Abdullah bin al-Hussein who was the King of Jordan and grandfather of Hussein of Jordan, and great grandfather of Abdullah II of Jordan, and Faisal who was king of Iraq during it's time as a monarchy from 1921-1958.



True, but the issue is that the world depends on a resource that is bountiful in the Middle East, there is a sense of universal irony in that fact. If we let them figure it out for themselves, so we can have consistent supplies of the resource it will disrupt the supply of the resource while they figure it out and we can't have that, if we maintain consistent supply of the resource, they'll never be able to sort it out for themselves and it will disrupt the supply of the resource.
Great points...all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2015, 05:02 AM
 
922 posts, read 806,285 times
Reputation: 1525
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
I think the hornets nest aspect is overblown. Before the oil and WW2, it was a relatively peaceful part of the world. Western meddling has made a mess of the region. Still, not all of the M.E. is bad. I have friends that work over there and they love it.

The M.E. needs to be free to develop organically. It would be painful and bloody, but outsiders can't fix it. That much I know.
****** please, Middle East has been a mess since the dawn of time, it is an important geopolitical center and the center of 3 major religions, Islamic Fundamentalism just makes things worse these days.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2015, 05:06 AM
 
922 posts, read 806,285 times
Reputation: 1525
Quote:
Originally Posted by MIKEETC View Post
Everyone knows, or should know, this.

Iran, Iraq, Libya, Saudi Arabia, Russia, Nigeria, Venezuela, among a few others, are regularly in the news. What do they have in common?

OIL.

[thicker than blood]
But Saudi Arabia is an US ally.
All wars are business ventures.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2015, 05:08 AM
 
10,829 posts, read 5,434,238 times
Reputation: 4710
Quote:
Originally Posted by knowledgeiskey View Post
For the longest, the idea of the US meddling in the Middle East for oil has been regarded as an anti-war conspiracy theory. This is the narrative from right side of the spectrum. But in reality, is it really a conspiracy theory? I mean many historians and political scientists have been contending that US foreign policy in the MENA is indeed driven by oil interest.
If we were there for the oil, then we would have gotten free oil from Iraq and Kuwait.

Didn't happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2015, 05:21 AM
 
17,291 posts, read 29,396,298 times
Reputation: 8691
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pruzhany View Post
Correction for bolded words (IMO): WW1 and European meddling.

The Middle East was "peaceful" because the current countries were operating under the Ottoman Empire, which by no means was a peaceful empire during its time.


Lest we forget it was the Ottomans that got involved in WW1 willingly on the wrong side. Frankly, after the way the Ottomans had held Europe at siege for centuries, who can blame Europeans for breaking the empire up?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2015, 05:21 AM
 
922 posts, read 806,285 times
Reputation: 1525
Quote:
Originally Posted by dechatelet View Post
If we were there for the oil, then we would have gotten free oil from Iraq and Kuwait.

Didn't happen.

The military industrial complex own the Pentagon, they are belligerent because it is their bread and butter, oil interests, corporate interests, Israel are also factors.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2015, 05:24 AM
 
17,291 posts, read 29,396,298 times
Reputation: 8691
Quote:
Originally Posted by dechatelet View Post
If we were there for the oil, then we would have gotten free oil from Iraq and Kuwait.

Didn't happen.


The funny thing about Iraq is that FRENCH and other European oil companies ultimately won the majority of contracts for oil in Iraq.


"Oil" is the macro theme of involvement in the middle east. But it's not really for the united states per se, but to ensure the continued flow of the stuff as a strategic resource necessary for trade by...well... every country in the world almost.


But yeah, we need to just abandon the area to its own devices. We are damned no matter what. Either we support and prop up secular dictators who want to kill their own people... or we support democracy and the people elect Islamist nutbags that want to kill the world. Great choices, that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top