Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think private property rights should be respected and that the respect given is a sign of a free society. And I believe that there should be no distinction between home and business. It is the right of ownership to make the rules within their respective domains.
Now maybe you can actually answer the questions in my original post to you above.
What's hard to understand about keeping those with penises out of multiple occupancy girls'/women's restrooms/changing/locker/shower room facilities, and vice versa?
Anyone who wants to change their sex and has completed sex reassignment surgery... fine... use the facilities of your surgically anatomically reassigned gender.
I think the people who are just 'offended' that there are people in our society that have a problem with so called trans gendered men using a ladies room really do not get it. The same people probably do not have very young children so really don't care about the impact.
And if they were born with a vagina, they are REQUIRED to use the restroom with your daughter.
It's time for these threads to close. These idjits couldn't "get it" if it were sitting on their face. It's useless to try to point out their stupidity & hypocrisy, you can't fix stoopid.
That is because the student might not have wanted to go back, they could have enrolled in another college to finish their degree. Settlement usually means money
Nope. You have nothing on which to base that assertion. Especially when sexual orientation is NOT a federally protected class, and this case was tried in federal court.
What's the popular vote threshold, does 60% or 70 %get them in?
The bigger hurdle is indecent exposure laws. How do trans persons with penises get around those laws when flashing their penises around in girls'/women's multiple occupancy restrooms/locker/shower rooms (and vice versa), especially when MINOR victims are present?
Those convicted of indecent exposure have to register as sex offenders for life.
It's time for these threads to close. These idjits couldn't "get it" if it were sitting on their face.
Many of us get this: FELONY indecent exposure. It's codified as a FELONY when committed on school grounds and/or if there are MINOR victims.
Prosecute these trans with penises for flashing them around girls (and vice versa). Let them endure the consequences of their actions: register as a child sex offender for life.
What's the popular vote threshold, does 60% or 70 %get them in?
The threshold is whatever it takes to get your local or state gov't. to mandate bathroom usage based on sexual identity or expression. I don't know about your local law in Long Island, or for NYS, but I doubt there's a statewide mandate for all accommodations to have bathroom of choice options. Boycott LI ?
Many of us get this: FELONY indecent exposure. It's codified as a FELONY when committed on school grounds and/or if there are MINOR victims.
Prosecute these trans with penises for flashing them around girls (and vice versa). Let them endure the consequences of their actions: register as a child sex offender for life.
And the next guy who walks into a woman's room wearing a dress sporting a five o'clock shadow that my daughter is using is going to have a serious problem with me.
Ah, so as long as a guy shaves and puts some swing to his hips, you won't know. The stereotype that you guys run with is just laughable. A man wearing a dress isn't going to be who rapes your daughter, it is going to probably be someone she knows.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.