PayPal pulls North Carolina plan after transgender bathroom law (Republicans, racial, poll)

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by Scooby Snacks

Hardly. As a female 30 something, I know, as all women do, that we run the risk of being sexually attacked every single second we're alive, no matter where we are. We are even attacked in our own homes. We could be raped when we're awake, when we're asleep, when we're dressed like a schoolmarm, when we're completely naked, and when we're 10 years old, sometimes even 100 years old. You missed my point completely, which is that a public restroom is a very low risk place for anyone to be sexually attacked, no matter what sex the person is or identifies as.

So why ADD to the risk by allowing any male who "says" he's trans into women's facilities?

This is nothing more than YET ANOTHER example of liberals' many WARS on GIRLS/WOMEN.

[FinsterRufus]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

Get back to us when your 13-year-old daughter has to unwillingly be exposed to a penis in the school girls' restroom/locker/shower room facilities.

Meanwhile... only 26% support exposed penises in women's/girl's facilities, and vice versa:

​CBS News Poll: Transgender kids and school bathrooms - CBS News

Oh calm down.

I really doubt she'll give a rat's, on the off chance that happens. She knows what a penis looks like.

She's got no qualms with nudity.

As long as the person is not threatening nor assaulting her, who cares? I don't understand the fear people have of seeing the human body.

[thefragile]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

I'm with the majority. 70% agree that trans persons with penises shouldn't be using girls'/women's facilities, and vice versa.

UIUC poll, August 2015:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...-locker-rooms/

Now how about answering the questions in my post. Deflecting only makes one look foolish.

[jjrose]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

I'm with the majority. 70% agree that trans persons with penises shouldn't be using girls'/women's facilities, and vice versa.

UIUC poll, August 2015:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...-locker-rooms/

You seem to be misrepresenting the poll results. There were 3 possible answers not 2. There was "support" "oppose", and "unsure"

https://transgenderinclusivepolicysu...cation-policy/

[jjrose]

Originally Posted by thefragile

Now how about answering the questions in my post. Deflecting only makes one look foolish.

But it's all she knows how to do. I have asked several questions, and still haven't received a straight answer to any of them.

[thefragile]

Originally Posted by jjrose

But it's all she knows how to do. I have asked several questions, and still haven't received a straight answer to any of them.

Of course, incapable of critical thinking.

[jjrose]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

So why ADD to the risk by allowing any male who "says" he's trans into women's facilities?

This is nothing more than YET ANOTHER example of liberals' many WARS on GIRLS/WOMEN.

If someone is going to break the laws regarding rape, what makes you think that the laws regarding which bathroom to use would stop them at the door?

[FinsterRufus]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

So why ADD to the risk by allowing any male who "says" he's trans into women's facilities?

This is nothing more than YET ANOTHER example of liberals' many WARS on GIRLS/WOMEN.

Nah, the real war on women is believing that they can't handle seeing a penis.

If someone is intent on assaulting someone they'll find a way.

Theres nothing to stop them walking into a restroom as it is, if that's what they want to do.

[Ceist]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

You apparently MISSED the fact that even the USDoE OCR report states that the trans student with a penis exposed himself in the girls' restroom/locker/shower room multiple times.

You didn't link to a USDoE OCR report. Now is your chance.

[Ceist]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

False. There is no misrepresentation. I've posted FACTS.

No you didn't. You posted a link to a news story with words like 'alleged' and 'supposedly' about what some parent at a meeting claimed she had been told and wrote your own hyperbolic conclusions.