Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-14-2016, 07:56 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,998 posts, read 44,813,405 times
Reputation: 13701

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BruSan View Post
Oh, for crying out loud with this silliness.

Kids have seen each other's pee pees all the time throughout history and it hasn't sent the world spinning off it's axis yet.
Really? Then explain why exposing opposite sex genitalia to an unwilling MINOR is a FELONY indecent exposure sex crime.

Also, you ARE aware that school kids are charged with sexual harassment/assault merely for hugging, holding hands, etc., with another student, no? No genitalia exposure involved, yet it's STILL a crime.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-14-2016, 07:57 AM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,802 posts, read 41,008,695 times
Reputation: 62194
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohhwanderlust View Post
So, what exactly is the BFD?
Wiener possessors who can't aim straight.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2016, 07:59 AM
 
22,923 posts, read 15,487,222 times
Reputation: 16962
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
They DIDN'T expose their opposite sex genitalia to minors in multiple occupancy changing/locker/shower rooms. ...Until now that Obama has given them permission to do so.
Oh for heaven's sake; this is just nuts.

Of all things the public needs to consider as affecting their future well being, you people pick this chit to get all persnickety over?

The President would not have even gotten involved had not so many of you made this into another chicken little "the sky is falling" event.

The world is rapidly coming to the conclusion the American public of today NEEDS something to fear to keep them engaged in the fully autonomous activity of breathing.

No pun intended, but you folks really need to just grow a pair and calm down!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2016, 08:08 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,998 posts, read 44,813,405 times
Reputation: 13701
Quote:
Originally Posted by BruSan View Post
Oh for heaven's sake; this is just nuts.

Of all things the public needs to consider as affecting their future well being, you people pick this chit to get all persnickety over?
"We" didn't pick it. Obama forced it on us and our kids.

This all started with first the PA university case, and then the IL school district case. And quite frankly, given the fact that a federal court has already ruled against what Obama has dictated, I don't see how this is anything but a losing battle for Obama, making him look even more incompetent and ineffective than he already is.

A PA public university expelled a FTM trans student with a vagina for using the men's multiple occupancy restrooms/locker/shower rooms, and federal court upheld the expulsion in 2015:
Quote:
"This case arises from Plaintiff Seamus Johnston’s allegations that Defendants discriminated against him based on his sex and his transgender status(1) by prohibiting him from using sex-segregated locker rooms and restrooms that were designated for men. Although the parties have submitted lengthy briefs and have advanced numerous arguments, this case presents one central question: whether a university, receiving federal funds, engages in unlawful discrimination, in violation of the United States Constitution and federal and state statutes, when it prohibits a transgender male student from using sex-segregated restrooms and locker rooms designated for men on a university campus. The simple answer is no."

(1) Plaintiff was born a female but identifies as a transgender male."
http://www.utimes.pitt.edu/documents...tonOpinion.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2016, 08:21 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,535,277 times
Reputation: 24780
Talking This bathroom bidness is a BIG deal to you

Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
They DIDN'T expose their opposite sex genitalia to minors in multiple occupancy changing/locker/shower rooms. ...Until now that Obama has given them permission to do so.
Prove it.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2016, 08:29 AM
 
59,037 posts, read 27,298,344 times
Reputation: 14280
Quote:
Originally Posted by westcoastforme View Post
Man I tell you, this is going to hand Trump the election on a silver platter if obama pushes his leftist agenda. .3% (point 3 percent, less than a half a percent of people are transgender)

Anyone who votes for sh*tlary Will continue this downward spiral of INSANITY.

it's home schooling for my kids if this crap is pushed and eventually becomes mandatory
While I agree mostly with what you say, please, PLEASE do NOT lower yourself to the lefts level with the juvenile name calling.

It make the rest of us look bad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2016, 08:35 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,998 posts, read 44,813,405 times
Reputation: 13701
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
Prove it.
Are you unaware that the Obama Admin required the IL school district to do so, and sent the same edict to schools, nationwide, yesterday?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2016, 08:50 AM
 
24,404 posts, read 23,061,247 times
Reputation: 15013
He's told what to say and what to support or oppose. His own opinions might surprise many people if he even has any of his own.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2016, 09:29 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,535,277 times
Reputation: 24780
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Are you unaware that the Obama Admin required the IL school district to do so, and sent the same edict to schools, nationwide, yesterday?
Yep.

It was in the news.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2016, 09:36 AM
 
22,923 posts, read 15,487,222 times
Reputation: 16962
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Really? Then explain why exposing opposite sex genitalia to an unwilling MINOR is a FELONY indecent exposure sex crime.

Also, you ARE aware that school kids are charged with sexual harassment/assault merely for hugging, holding hands, etc., with another student, no? No genitalia exposure involved, yet it's STILL a crime.
It's only a crime if there is a complaint filed. If no one objects it's a high probablility no one in officialdom even knows, correct?

You seriously believe that on every occasion your daughter or son had occasion to see the opposite sex in-flagrante....a crime was committed and was therefore reported? You must live in a bubble.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top