Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-30-2016, 11:05 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,737,789 times
Reputation: 14745

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperJohn View Post
The thread is on Obamacare. There is currently no payroll tax like they have in countries that have UHC, which is exactly what I stated: a new payroll tax and an increase in the current Medicare tax.
You stated we have no payroll tax.

We do have payroll taxes, and they predate obamacare by decades.

You also don't seem to grasp that payroll taxes are not required to fund single payer healthcare.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-30-2016, 11:09 AM
 
Location: North America
14,204 posts, read 12,284,457 times
Reputation: 5565
You guys realize that the chairman of HHS has nothing to do with legislation? Medicare isn't going to be privatized. Like Social Security it's a great talking point for the right, but it's political suicide to even get serious about it. Last time Ryan tried to bring it up it was so popular that Republicans were canceling town halls to avoid the people coming there yelling at them over it. What will happen is what always happens. It will get discussed seriously. The AARP will get wind of it and mobilize scores of ads. Old people will see the ads and light up the Congressman's phones like Christmas trees. The idea will shelved to a later date which will never happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2016, 11:10 AM
 
Location: Arizona
13,778 posts, read 9,664,501 times
Reputation: 7485
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
Thats because obamacare ruined private plans for young people.

I'm not kidding, it went from $75/mo to $500/mo
Only problem, the $75 a month plan didn't actually insure anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2016, 11:12 AM
 
Location: Arizona
13,778 posts, read 9,664,501 times
Reputation: 7485
Quote:
Originally Posted by ~HecateWhisperCat~ View Post
You guys realize that the chairman of HHS has nothing to do with legislation? Medicare isn't going to be privatized. Like Social Security it's a great talking point for the right, but it's political suicide to even get serious about it. Last time Ryan tried to bring it up it was so popular that Republicans were canceling town halls to avoid the people coming there yelling at them over it. What will happen is what always happens. It will get discussed seriously. The AARP will get wind of it and mobilize scores of ads. Old people will see the ads and light up the Congressman's phones like Christmas trees. The idea will shelved to a later date which will never happen.
I hope you're right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2016, 12:36 PM
 
1,850 posts, read 820,901 times
Reputation: 815
Quote:
Originally Posted by ~HecateWhisperCat~ View Post
You guys realize that the chairman of HHS has nothing to do with legislation? Medicare isn't going to be privatized. Like Social Security it's a great talking point for the right, but it's political suicide to even get serious about it. Last time Ryan tried to bring it up it was so popular that Republicans were canceling town halls to avoid the people coming there yelling at them over it. What will happen is what always happens. It will get discussed seriously. The AARP will get wind of it and mobilize scores of ads. Old people will see the ads and light up the Congressman's phones like Christmas trees. The idea will shelved to a later date which will never happen.
Yes, we all realize that nobody can touch Medicare because after liberals bribed seniors with it, it has forever served its purpose, which is to ensure that Democrats always remain in power. I mean, seriously, you're acting like nobody has ever figured this out ever before.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2016, 01:08 PM
 
1,285 posts, read 592,198 times
Reputation: 762
Quote:
Price’s plan would offer less protection for people with pre-existing conditions — individuals would need to maintain continuous insurance coverage, or risk running into problems getting covered.
What that does is opens a window to deny coverage for pre-existing conditions.
Insurance companies have in the past and will likely do again, is open that window wide enough to drive a truck through it.
They will discover financial incentive to deny coverage.
Thus they will find ways to deny coverage.

Change jobs much?

Loose your coverage for any medical condition you had in the past that your current health ins underwriters can remotely and imaginatively connect it to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2016, 01:49 PM
 
1,985 posts, read 1,457,005 times
Reputation: 862
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobNJ1960 View Post
Excellent. Covering stuff that happened by buying insurance LATER is not what insurance should be.
The idea is actually a version of the mandate cleaned up for public consumption. If you get insurance during a one time giant open enrollment or at a life event (turning 26) you can move from plan to plan with out any issues with conditions or health. If you drop out instead of punishing you with a tax we will instead hit you with no insurance subsidies for life and no exemptions from pre existing conditions. Basically if you want affordable health insurance later you have to buy it now. Same rule different stick.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2016, 02:03 PM
 
1,985 posts, read 1,457,005 times
Reputation: 862
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
He did not. Posts like this help me understand why people vote for people who lie on camera with a straight face.
Again here are the links.
Public option was in Obama's platform | PolitiFact
https://thinkprogress.org/flashback-...6e0#.e8d11vun7
The 2008 Presidential Candidates' Health Reform Proposals: Choices for America - The Commonwealth Fund

And if you need it from the horse's mouth it was on his website. He planned on creating a public plan based on the coverage afforded congress.

https://web.archive.org/web/20080214...es/healthcare/

I remember reading this back in 2008 He really did back a public plan it's the main reason I backed him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2016, 02:05 PM
 
1,985 posts, read 1,457,005 times
Reputation: 862
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Why should medical debt be placed above other debt?
Yeah not sure I see the point other the further destroying the middle class.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2016, 02:07 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,210,872 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by East of the River View Post
Again here are the links.
Public option was in Obama's platform | PolitiFact
https://thinkprogress.org/flashback-...6e0#.e8d11vun7
The 2008 Presidential Candidates' Health Reform Proposals: Choices for America - The Commonwealth Fund

And if you need it from the horse's mouth it was on his website. He planned on creating a public plan based on the coverage afforded congress.

https://web.archive.org/web/20080214...es/healthcare/

I remember reading this back in 2008 He really did back a public plan it's the main reason I backed him.
“We now face an opportunity — and an obligation — to turn the page on the failed politics of yesterday's health care debates… My plan begins by covering every American. If you already have health insurance, the only thing that will change for you under this plan is the amount of money you will spend on premiums. That will be less. If you are one of the 45 million Americans who don't have health insurance, you will have it after this plan becomes law. No one will be turned away because of a preexisting condition or illness.”

Total lie. None of that happened. Him lying and saying that all will be covered is not what we are talking about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top