Roy Moore allegedly raped a 14 year old when he was in his 30s *MERGED* (Congress, accuse)

[zzzSnorlax]

Originally Posted by Simpsonvilllian

It is relevant if liberals like you supported Bill Clinton but now say Moore is disqualified.

This is what people refer to as an unsupported assumption, based only on your own cognitive biases.

Originally Posted by Simpsonvilllian

And you know that is the case for many Democrats blasting Moore.

I get people don't like accurately identified as hypocrites.

Probably, but just assuming so about anyone who doesn't have the exact same opinion on this matter as you is nonsensical.

[ClemVegas]

Originally Posted by zzzSnorlax

This is what people refer to as an unsupported assumption, based only on your own cognitive biases.



Probably, but just assuming so about anyone who doesn't have the exact same opinion on this matter as you is nonsensical.

Ok, it doesn't matter what you think about me. In my view you are trying to make this topic about me. I don't see any reason why you are the judge and jury of me, and you don't get to dictate to me what I talk about on here.

[zzzSnorlax]

Originally Posted by Simpsonvilllian

Ok, it doesn't matter what you think about me.

Likewise.

Originally Posted by Simpsonvilllian

In my view you are trying to make this topic about me. I don't see any reason why you are the judge and jury of me, and you don't get to dictate to me what I talk about on here.

Not sure what you expect people think, when you jump to inaccurate conclusions half-cocked.

[ClemVegas]

Originally Posted by zzzSnorlax

Likewise. Not sure what you expect people think, when you jump to inaccurate conclusions half-cocked.

Yes, because if I don't validate your opinions, my conclusions are 'half cocked.

I note again that you can't defend Democrat hypocrisy on sexual misconduct allegations.

Anyway, this is going to keep going around in circles. I think Roy is going to win. I'll post again if he does.

[zzzSnorlax]

Originally Posted by Simpsonvilllian

Yes, because if I don't validate your opinions, my conclusions are 'half cocked.

Nah, when you tell me I'm a Clinton supporter, when I have never voted for either Clinton, merely because you think my opinion on something is different than yours, THAT is half-cocked.

Originally Posted by Simpsonvilllian

I note again that you can't defend Democrat hypocrisy on sexual misconduct allegations.

And why would I do that when I don't identify as or consistently vote as a Democrat?

[ClemVegas]

Many liberals will deny their liberalism on the internet.

But you appear to be trying to make this topic about you. And I'm not interested in talking about you. Adios.

[zzzSnorlax]

Originally Posted by Simpsonvilllian

Many liberals will deny it on the internet.

So now we are down to you just telling me I am a liar. OK. We are done here, we have arrived at the bottom of the barrel.

Originally Posted by Simpsonvilllian

But you appear to be trying to make this topic about you.

Nah, you did that as soon as you started making unfounded assumptions about people you are arguing against to try and make the discussion fit the narrative you have running inside your head.

[ClemVegas]

Originally Posted by zzzSnorlax

So now we are down to you just telling me I am a liar. OK. We are done here, we have arrived at the bottom of the barrel.

You think Moore is a liar so why can't I think you are a liar.

It is safe to say you are very anti-Moore. If you are very anti-Moore, it is probably because you are on the left.

[zzzSnorlax]

Originally Posted by Simpsonvilllian

You think Moore is a liar so why can't I think you are a liar.

Oh you are allowed, it just means there is no more discussion to be had here.

Originally Posted by Simpsonvilllian

If you are very anti-Moore, it is probably because you are on the left.

Surely, that can be the only possible explanation!

[ClemVegas]

I've already said that I don't want to talk to you b/c you want to talk about yourself which doesn't interest me.

I never said it was the only explaination, which is why I included 'probably'. It is pretty clear you mischaracterize things on purpose or you don't understand what words like probably mean.

Adios. Not interested in this kind of tit for tat thing with you.