Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You do know Wilmer Valderrama was born in this country, yes?
Pick a name a when you show up at the border door step and ask for "asylum". Someone clarified the process though. Like I mentioned, you're muddying the waters between refugee and potential illegals to push the open borders agenda. It's never humanitarian to separate children from parents but it's more humanitarian than throwing them in jail and processing them like law breakers that the parents are.
No it isn't. The process and law is that they apply for asylum and are then referred to the US for asylum. Showing up at the border is not how the process works. Read your own links.
There are numerous ways to claim asylum. Turning up at the border is one. And the process can be quick.
and The reason to avoid requesting asylum at the port of entry to the U.S. is that the inspections officers have the power to quickly find you inadmissible and deport you, in which case you will not be allowed to return for five years. This can happen if an inspector believes that you are making a misrepresentation (committing fraud),
People are not stupid, not the administration nor those trying to get across the border by asylum. We are cracking down on asylum seekers and those crossing the border illegally as we should be.
Seriously? Even if you do feel compassion for both sides you still have to choose whether the actions taken after a crime is committed favors the law breakers or their victims and act in like manner.
Pick a name a when you show up at the border door step and ask for "asylum". Someone clarified the process though. Like I mentioned, you're muddying the waters between refugee and potential illegals to push the open borders agenda. It's never humanitarian to separate children from parents but it's more humanitarian than throwing them in jail and processing them like law breakers that the parents are.
I don't believe I said a word about refugees in this thread. Confusing me with another poster perhaps?
Seriously? Even if you do feel compassion for both sides you still have to choose whether the actions taken after a crime is committed favors the law breakers or their victims and act in like manner.
Or you can try an equitable solution fair to both parties.
Can you point to where the clarification occured? I concur, there is no protection for those illegally entering the country, only for those who seek asylum.
I will never see it as humanitarian to separate children from their parents. Detain, and return, no problem, but put children in separate camps? That is just not right.
Why give law breakers any kind of equitable solution? It's not fair to the victim because it rewards in part the acts of the law breaker.
Why not have intelligent, sensitive solutions to real world problems?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Confusing me with another poster perhaps?
