Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-20-2018, 12:21 PM
 
45,676 posts, read 24,030,238 times
Reputation: 15559

Advertisements

Of course there were huge deficits during Obama.
The economy, the wars, you just can't just shut down.

Look at Trump -- the economy has been steady for six years - and he can't even bring down the deficit.

He walked into 75 months of job growth......wow -- a growing stock market, corporations with a few years of profit under their belt....and we still have growing deficits.

I blame the swamp.

I don't care which party you belong to -- neither one is truly a fiscal conservative. They just have different ideas of how to spend the money.
https://www.thebalance.com/deficit-b...s-hide-3306151

Historical information on the deficit by President.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-20-2018, 12:21 PM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,113 posts, read 34,747,185 times
Reputation: 15093
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwynedd1 View Post
We are now seeing unemployment drop with a stable labor participation rate.
Quote:
More people have given up on finding work and therefore are no longer counted as either working or unemployed. That's why the unemployment rate keeps dropping. It isn't the underlying strength of the economy that reaches all levels of society. The number of jobs might be keeping rough pace with the growth of the population, but that is it. There is no broad economic cheer.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/erikshe.../#208af57c408b
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2018, 12:22 PM
 
20,728 posts, read 19,374,196 times
Reputation: 8288
Quote:
Originally Posted by cofor View Post
I like how you ignore that it stabilized before Trump was elected and that there was a financial collapse in 08. I also like how you pivot away from Trump escalating deficits and how his policies have resulted in climbing interest rates on that debt.

I like how you ignore this.
Yep most of the credit does indeed have to go to an algorithm where congress not even need convene.

Trump is slightly better because of two active polices I mentioned.

What was Obama's policy that saved us?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2018, 12:29 PM
 
435 posts, read 176,352 times
Reputation: 395
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwynedd1 View Post
I like how you ignore this.
Yep most of the credit does indeed have to go to an algorithm where congress not even need convene.

Trump is slightly better because of two active polices I mentioned.

What was Obama's policy that saved us?
I never argued that Obama saved us from anything. I am arguing that Trump's economic policies are geared toward short term gains with long term losses, and that all of these metrics were heading in the same direction before him.

Like it or not, we are in a global economy, and for the most part, the western world economies were on the same ride during the global recession. If you look at the GDP growth numbers of like economies through the recession, they took a similar path whether the country chose austerity measures or stimulus measures. We had two countries that outperformed us through 2012 with regard to GDP growth, I think it was Canada and Sweden, or maybe Switzerland.

I am not arguing for Obama's policies, I am saying what Trump is doing is politically expedient, but not healthy for the long term prospects of our country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2018, 12:34 PM
 
20,728 posts, read 19,374,196 times
Reputation: 8288
Quote:
Originally Posted by BajanYankee View Post


And this repeats exactly what I showed. The labor participation rate has stabilized while the unemployment rate has dropped. That means the trend is actually positive. Its weak historically but positive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2018, 12:34 PM
 
435 posts, read 176,352 times
Reputation: 395
I invoked Obama's name because conservatives lamented Obama's spending. Since they hate him so much, I figured if I pointed out that Trump was increasing deficits from where Obama left them, you all might stop and take notice about how unhealthy these policies are long term. I was wrong, you guys don't really care about deficits, debt or fiscal responsibility, my apologies
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2018, 12:37 PM
 
20,728 posts, read 19,374,196 times
Reputation: 8288
Quote:
Originally Posted by cofor View Post
I never argued that Obama saved us from anything. I am arguing that Trump's economic policies are geared toward short term gains with long term losses, and that all of these metrics were heading in the same direction before him.
yeah. Trumps polices are good for now, not later. Obama's polices were good for never.

Which do you prefer?


Now is a good time to retire debt and improve your economic position .


Quote:
Like it or not, we are in a global economy, and for the most part, the western world economies were on the same ride during the global recession. If you look at the GDP growth numbers of like economies through the recession, they took a similar path whether the country chose austerity measures or stimulus measures. We had two countries that outperformed us through 2012 with regard to GDP growth, I think it was Canada and Sweden, or maybe Switzerland.

I am not arguing for Obama's policies, I am saying what Trump is doing is politically expedient, but not healthy for the long term prospects of our country.
Improve you own position, now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2018, 12:40 PM
 
435 posts, read 176,352 times
Reputation: 395
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwynedd1 View Post
yeah. Trumps polices are good for now, not later. Obama's polices were good for never.

Which do you prefer?

.
Lol, neither, which is why I voted for Gary Johnson.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2018, 12:51 PM
 
20,728 posts, read 19,374,196 times
Reputation: 8288
Quote:
Originally Posted by cofor View Post
I invoked Obama's name because conservatives lamented Obama's spending. Since they hate him so much, I figured if I pointed out that Trump was increasing deficits from where Obama left them, you all might stop and take notice about how unhealthy these policies are long term. I was wrong, you guys don't really care about deficits, debt or fiscal responsibility, my apologies

What do you think my position might have been at that time?

MMP Blog 2: THE BASICS OF MACRO ACCOUNTING - New Economic PerspectivesNew Economic Perspectives
One’s financial asset is another’s financial liability. It is a fundamental principle of accounting that for every financial asset there is an equal and offsetting financial liability. The checking deposit is a household’s financial asset, offset by the bank’s liability (or IOU). A government or corporate bond is a household asset, but represents a liability of the issuer (either the government or the corporation). The household has some liabilities, too, including student loans, a home mortgage, or a car loan. These are held as assets by the creditor, which could be a bank or any of a number of types of financial institutions including pension funds, hedge funds, or insurance companies. A household’s net financial wealth is equal to the sum of all its financial assets (equal to its financial wealth) less the sum of its financial liabilities (all of the money-denominated IOUs it issued). If that is positive, it has positive net financial wealth.

The only source of net financial private wealth is net financial public debt.


So what is the only way in a non commodity based currency to increase net private, financial wealth?

You seem smart enough to know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2018, 12:56 PM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,113 posts, read 34,747,185 times
Reputation: 15093
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwynedd1 View Post
And this repeats exactly what I showed. The labor participation rate has stabilized while the unemployment rate has dropped. That means the trend is actually positive. Its weak historically but positive.
The Labor Force Participation Rate did not stabilize under Trump. It has hovered between 62.6% and 63.0% since December 2015.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:32 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top