Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This is why you guys keep losing. Keep lying. Keep driving independent voters away. The guy is a stand-up federal judge with no criminal history even. He’s not mentally ill and has no evidence of that. He’s not an alcoholic because he drank at parties in high school. Give it up. Choose better battles.
A “stand-up federal judge”? This is completely laughable! How do you even know if he has problems with alcohol or has mental health issues?
Just a reminder: the Democrats, under Harry Reid, implemented that simple majority rule. At the time (2013) Mitch McConnell warned them that they would end up regretting that move. Lo’ and behold, fast forward 5 years, here we are with the Democrats regretting the move. Apparently turtle boy has a crystal ball.
It would be funny if the GOP changed it back in 2024.
I honestly didn't know anything about Kavanaugh. After all the smears and pushing that he was guilty of a heinous crime without a shred of evidence? I am glad it blew up on them. I just hope we aren't stuck with a bad judge. They should have attacked based on his judicial record. I have to believe that there is a reason that they didn't.
I don't know if you listened to Senator Collin's speech today ..... but she laid out his Judicial Record and the discussions she had with him about his cases ...... 3 hours of discussions about CASES.
I'm sure transcripts are available ..... and it's worth reading if you didn't hear it.
You are correct -- there is a reason that they went after the "gang rape, ice throwing, drinking beer in college", "sexual assault" ........ They could NOT go after his 12 years on the 4th Circuit Court OR his 307 Opinions on that court ...... his record was good, he has been an excellent and FAIR Judge.
They had to go the Character Assassination with totally unsubstantiated/uncollaborated allegations of heinous acts ...... That NEVER happened.
...that wasn't a job interview....who's stupid enough to fall for that one
That was a hearing against accusations...if that were a job interview Ford would have been show the door the first five minutes
Yes it was. Many positions require more than one interview, especially if something comes up.
I mean who does that:
“So you’re saying there’s never been a case where you drank so much that you didn’t remember what happened the night before, or part of what happened?”
“You’re asking about, you know, blackout. I don’t know. Have you?”
“Could you answer the question, Judge? That’s not happened. Is that your answer?”
“Yeah, and I’m curious if you have.”
As I said, try something like this at a job interview, report back how soon you are shown the door.
Six, oh wait, no SEVEN background investigations. What have you got to back your assertion? A magic eight ball?
Why in the hell would you want someone on the court who could change our whole society?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
