Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Maybe Crooked Trump can find a former male prostitute turned reporter to ask easy questions. You guys remember Jeff Gannon that asked Bush Jr. questions right?
Look for Trump to only take questions from hard-hitting reporter David Dennison at the next White House press conference.
Well if so he took his cue from liberals who every day throw temper tantrums, and insult people. Democrats don't like it when people fight back obviously. Trump is supposed to cower and take the abuse.
the 5th amendment applies to due process for life, liberty and property. None of that applies to Acosta. Acosta wasn't arrested, no charges file nor his property confiscated.
If the judge gives his final ruling and sides with CNN using the due process clause, this will go to the SC and rightly so.
Cool story, Fatbob, but right wingers should be thrilled with this ruling...... funny how they don't seem to even know that, but i guess so many are so low information they were likely hoping Acosta would lose.....Trumpy folk are amusing time and time again they are cheering on their own demise and don't even know it...
Trump could shoot Acosta in the middle of Broadway at high noon and his supporters would cheer wildly.
Since the White House is the people's house and not Trump's little castle?
so do I have a right to go in the White House when I want and debate and argue with the President on national tv, be rude and disregard rules and hijack a Press Conference?.....it's my house? right? LMAO!
So is this setting a precedence allowing all press the blessing to conduct themselves like spoiled children. No civility, respect, procedure, Roberts rule of order?
I guess the only recourse may be to end briefings.
Just the opposite. The judge ordered the WH to submit rules and procedures.
This is actually a Yuge win for Trump. The judge ruled on due process and called on WH to submit rules and procedures. Implicity he is saying WH can set any rules it wants and revoke anyone's pass so long as they post the rules and provide for appeals. So maybe the rules will be like this. 1. Invitees will not speak until it is their turn, which begins when called upon. 2. Invitees will stop speaking when their turn ends, as determined by the host or when next person is called upon. 3) Invitees will promptly hand over mike and sit down when their turn ends. Violations will be subject to pass revocation. 1st offense - 3 days. 2nd offense - 30 days. 3rd offense - lifetime. No more interruptions or grandstanding.
the 5th amendment applies to due process for life, liberty and property. None of that applies to Acosta. Acosta wasn't arrested, no charges file nor his property confiscated.
If the judge gives his final ruling and sides with CNN using the due process clause, this will go to the SC and rightly so.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hellion1999
so do I have a right to go in the White House when I want and debate and argue with the President on national tv, be rude and disregard rules and hijack a Press Conference?.....it's my house? right? LMAO!
Read Sherrill v. Knight. Seriously. These arguments were addressed and unanimously decided. The application of the Fifth Amendment in conjunction with the First Amendment? Discussed and decided. Whether the press has a greater right to access the White House than the general public? Discussed and decided. Just read the case instead of posting inane hypotheticals that were already addressed.
Just the opposite. The judge ordered the WH to submit rules and procedures.
This is actually a Yuge win for Trump. The judge ruled on due process and called on WH to submit rules and procedures. Implicity he is saying WH can set any rules it wants and revoke anyone's pass so long as they post the rules and provide for appeals. So maybe the rules will be like this. 1. Invitees will not speak until it is their turn, which begins when called upon. 2. Invitees will stop speaking when their turn ends, as determined by the host or when next person is called upon. 3) Invitees will promptly hand over mike and sit down when their turn ends. Violations will be subject to pass revocation. 1st offense - 3 days. 2nd offense - 30 days. 3rd offense - lifetime. No more interruptions or grandstanding.
again NO.
it does not explicitly say that. that is simply the right wing trying to frame this in a postive light that their base can understand.
Trump's own hand picked and appointed attorney rules against him. Props to the judge for following the Constitution.
Actually, the judge didn't. (Even though I think the ruling will have the end effect of benefiting Trump.)
The Consitution lays out three EQUAL branches of government. It does not specify one branch at the top that can decide what two other branches a level below can do or not do. A judge has no more rights to dictate how the executive conducts business within the White House than the executive does to issue an EO dictating how the courts must handle their cases.
Shroud of secrecy? What do you call the process by which appeals courts decide whether or not to hear a case? Maybe Trump should issue an EO mandating that SCOTUS publish the rules and criteria for how they determine the cases they will hear and order them to treat all appeals fairly and evenly?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
