Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I could be dr, lawyer or mayor, have a salary and run for POTUS. If I were to win, all my assets could go into a blind trust. My job would be over so no conflict there.
The trouble with electing as POTUS a person who has holdings all over the world, with all kinds of people makes a blind trust impossible. He is in business with far too many other entities and people. And then there are his partner children. There is no way to suspend business while the major owner is POTUS.
IMO, that why it was stupid of him to think it could be done. And stupid of voters who thought a real estate developer would be a better POTUS.
A businessman could be POTUS. How about Romney or Huntsman? They could place their holdings in a blind trust. Jimmy Cater did. But when he left office he was almost bankrupt. So were his siblings. He hadn't talked to the trustee the entire time he served.
I don't think he thought it could be done, and I don't think he ever thought it would need to be addressed because I don't think he ever thought he would win.
MSNBC reporting they have not yet been able to independently verify the authenticity of the Letter of Intent or Trump’s signature, as reported by CNN. That did not however stop Giuliani from proclaiming “ Of course Trump signed it”, seemilngly obivious to contradicting his previous remarks.
I don't think he thought it could be done, and I don't think he ever thought it would need to be addressed because I don't think he ever thought he would win.
He denies it too. So impasse. You want to believe the lying CNN, and it's their accusation, then of course have at it.
But. Where's the tower? LAWL.
An impasse is when two (or more) separate parties disagree or are deadlocked. One person telling two completely contradictory versions of a story is not an impasse. There are far more derogatory labels that apply to that situation.
“I don’t think I said nobody signed it,” Giuliani told the Daily News, even though he told the broadcaster “no one signed” the letter. In a stunning contradiction, Giuliani told The News that “of course” Trump signed it. https://www.nydailynews.com/news/pol...219-story.html
You parrot Hannity, Limbaugh, Breitbart, Infowars, Zerohedge.
So what's your point?
And you NEVER make a comment until those sources have made their spin.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
