Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Should unions be illegal?
Yes 16 12.21%
No 115 87.79%
Voters: 131. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-24-2019, 05:31 PM
Status: "Let this year be over..." (set 25 days ago)
 
Location: Where my bills arrive
19,220 posts, read 17,105,490 times
Reputation: 15539

Advertisements

Private industry, yes Public Service, No

All shops should be open so no one is forced to join...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-24-2019, 05:35 PM
 
16,825 posts, read 17,744,701 times
Reputation: 20852
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mtnluver8956 View Post
I think so..
So much for freedom of association.

Pesky constitution!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2019, 05:46 PM
 
Location: North Carolina
6,120 posts, read 4,613,312 times
Reputation: 10587
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1AngryTaxPayer View Post
Public yes, private no.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
i agree with this, public sector unions should be abolished forever. private sector unions however should be free to created. the only thing is that i would make it illegal to force people to join a union.
As far as public sector unions, the opponents didn't really articulate a reason why they think they should be illegal, but there is a downside to doing this.

Having advocacy on the side of workers helps discourage politicians prone to corruption from firing good employees for being whistleblowers when something corrupt or malfeasant happens and gives good employees more protection for doing the right thing. If a politician thinks they can just fire someone for doing the right thing without having a legitimate reason for doing so, corruption is more likely to be swept under the rug because good people are afraid to speak up because of losing their job with no one having their back.

Also, if private sector workers have a benefit that public sector workers can't have, this is one more way to make it harder to attract quality employees who may look elsewhere.

Last edited by Jowel; 02-24-2019 at 06:16 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2019, 05:47 PM
 
Location: Middle America
11,102 posts, read 7,171,699 times
Reputation: 17012
Unless you want to limit freedoms and liberties (which is stupid), the answer is clearly "No".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2019, 06:18 PM
 
35,309 posts, read 52,336,651 times
Reputation: 31000
https://goo.gl/images/2nfnNt
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2019, 06:25 PM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,850 posts, read 26,307,990 times
Reputation: 34059
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
No, unions are just an exercise of free association. However unions should not be able to use coercion on ownership. If a union strikes, its members are subject to termination. Unions also shouldnt be able to force contracts, pay or membership agreements on those who dont wish to join or against the express wishes of ownership.
You dont get special privledges or protections because you become part of a group
So they should just have picnics once a year?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2019, 06:47 PM
 
22,665 posts, read 24,619,009 times
Reputation: 20347
It should be ILLEGAL for a business to require anyone to join a union as a condition
of employment/continued-employment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2019, 06:51 PM
 
Location: Flyover Country
26,211 posts, read 19,535,610 times
Reputation: 21679
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mtnluver8956 View Post
I think so..
What?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2019, 06:53 PM
 
Location: Houston, TX
3,909 posts, read 2,124,080 times
Reputation: 1644
Quote:
Originally Posted by odanny View Post
What?
right to work is the way to go.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2019, 06:53 PM
 
Location: Flyover Country
26,211 posts, read 19,535,610 times
Reputation: 21679
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
. Unions also shouldnt be able to force contracts, pay or membership agreements on those who dont wish to join or against the express wishes of ownership.
You don't have to belong to a union if you don't want to. I work in a union shop and I have every right to not pay union dues every month and terminate my membership if I want to. I've seen the good and bad of unions over the years, and even now I still have mixed feelings on how unions conduct their business.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top