Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well, the point is, Owens' words aren't by design to attract other African Americans into the GOP. She's really catering to white conservatives who can then point to her and say, "See? We're not racist."
What policies that other GOP politicians that are globalist or nationalist (insular) in nature doesn't really matter in terms of policy.
On another matter, there are plenty of black Republicans or black conservatives who don't make absurd statements denying white nationalism or run down their fellow black people, like Colin Powell, Condoleeza Rice, or Tim Scott. Candice Owens, sadly, isn't one of them.
Candice runs the modern day Under Ground Railroad. She is not property.
Candace Owens was on Capitol Hill today testifying as a GOP witness at a House Judiciary Committee hearing on white nationalism.
During the committee, the despicable Ted Lieu attacked Owens by playing some comments by her taken out of context, to suggest she could have supported Hitler.
Here’s that video:
But thankfully the Republican ranking member gave up his time to allow her to respond, and did she ever.
Watch:
She is so right. Scare tactics to win elections is all it is. Good for her.
A Black American woman who loves President Donald J Trump!
Good for her.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Absolom
Basically, Candace Owens broke her foot off in Lieu's ass.
In the real world she claimed that Hitler should not be classified as a nationalist "because he killed his own people", which is also kind of stupid. That fact aside, it is in fact possible for political movements to possess several characteristics. Communism, for instance, was internationalist. Nazism was nationalist. Fascism is also nationalist. No historian would deny that Hitler was nationalist, his entire ideology was based on it. You would look equally intelligent arguing he couldn't be totalitarian, because he was a national socialist. Ã’ Or that Stalin couldn't have been internationalist, because he was a communist.
Hitler wanted to conquer the world. National Socialist. Not a Social Nationalist.
Junker's EU has accomplished everything Hitler set out to do.
I am so sure the Dems should be talking about who’s smart... They elected AOC to congress.
I rest my case.
110,000 voters in NY 14th elected her. Don't try to blame all democrats for her (who I personally think is an idiot) and we won't hold all Republicans responsible for Steve King- fair enough?
Why do people believe this flip flopper who was against Trump during the election but then realized people like Diamond and Silk got press coverage for praising Trump rather than knocking him. Candice even scrubbed her blog and Twitter of anti-conservative comments. She posted this in a 2015 blog, "bat-****-crazy antics of the Republican Tea Party... The good news is, they will eventually die off (peacefully in their sleep, we hope), and then we can get right on with the OBVIOUS social change that needs to happen, IMMEDIATELY."
Any proof of this last part? I've heard it repeated but nothing solid.
Why does it have to be that? This is a false choice since maybe she just wanted a slightly progressive but not quite Berniecrat level, similar to say Obama. She is a phony. A BIG FAT PHONY! She went from someone who attacked the person she became in no less than two years. Care to explain this. I HIGHLY doubt that Candice Owens is THAT smart considering despite her being able to scrub the blogs that someone wouldn't have screen-shotted or saved the blog, nor archives.
I have not read this entire thread but why was Mrs. Owens testifying in front of Congress. To my knowledge she is far from a expert on the subject so why was she selected. I'm not trying to start and argument but I just wonder why was she selected.
I have not read this entire thread but why was Mrs. Owens testifying in front of Congress. To my knowledge she is far from a expert on the subject so why was she selected. I'm not trying to start and argument but I just wonder why was she selected.
Did you have someone else in mind?
I’m sure she was there for a specific reason. Republicans know, Democrats absolutely despise black Conservatives. Democrats demand anyone of color to vote blue, otherwise they’re deemed an abomination.
110,000 voters in NY 14th elected her. Don't try to blame all democrats for her (who I personally think is an idiot) and we won't hold all Republicans responsible for Steve King- fair enough?
Fair enough, but was she or was she not elected by Democrats? That being said, I don’t blame anyone who wants to distance themselves for her. And him for that matter. Lol
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
