After nearly 50 years of caterwauling and insisting man's activities cause climate change, still NO PROOF? (economy, vs)

[rjshae]

Data shows most of the glaciers in the Himalayas around Mt. Everest have been in retreat since at least 1976.

https://rd.springer.com/article/10.1...442-010-0803-8

Hence, this sort of thing is to be expected.

Originally Posted by Vf6cruiser

All of this noise over what should be a 5th grade science question......lol........the mystery is what does that big yellow ball have to do with it..........certainly the HOAX of the century

If it's a hoax, then I have to say the Earth is doing a great job of faking it. Well done Mother Nature, you've got at least some of us fooled.

[Roboteer]

Originally Posted by sanspeur

A gruesome scene due to climate change...

About 200 people died during their attempt to climb the Mount Everest. The highest mountain in the world has been climbed since 1922. Now snow and ice is melting the deaths on Mount Everest become visible due to climate change. Many climbers reached successfully the top of the Mount Everest but many died during this adventure.

And still no proof that man had anything to do with the climate change.

[sanspeur]

Originally Posted by hawkeye2009

So have you given up air conditioning, central heat, electricity, and your car?


If not, you are just an AGW hypocrite.


PS- It's summer in the northern hemisphere. Ice melts more in the summer than the winter. Just remain patient and all will be well in four months. This is why we hike in Yosemite in the summer, rather than the winter; it is probably a strange concept, but one gets more snow, ice, and colder temps in the winter. CO2 induced "warming" just doesn't seem to work as well in the summer.


Also, what is the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere at 29,000 feet? Okay- CO2 is 420 ppm at sea level, right? And CO2 concentration decreases 3% per thousand feet, right? So Everest is about 30,000 feet, so we have a 30% reduction in CO2, right?


.30 X 420 = 126


420- 126 = 294 ppm CO2 at the top of Everest.


SO you have just shown that your "AGW" effect is minimal, if not non-existent, on Everest.


Think before you speak, particularly when defending a hoax which cannot be defended.

You should have read the article...There are bodies being exposed for the first time.... You need to stop wasting your time responding to me....

"Because of global warming, the ice sheet and glaciers are fast melting and the dead bodies that remained buried all these years are now becoming exposed," said Ang Tshering Sherpa, former president of Nepal Mountaineering Association.
"We have brought down dead bodies of some mountaineers who died in recent years, but the old ones that remained buried are now coming out."

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-47638436

[hawkeye2009]

Originally Posted by Chicano3000X

Well next time your up there on Everest yourself to collect data, please let us know your results.. Because apparently you have more experience than those actually seeing this unfold and studying it..

I really don't need to "see" anything, as Sanspeur just showed us that CO2 levels are irrelevant in melting on Everest (which happens every summer).


One really cannot defend this AGW lunacy, as it is indefensible.


Again, with CO2 levels at 290 ppm, every AGW lib should be THRILLED with these numbers, as this apparently is what you all pine for, is it not?


Yet there we have the "perfect" CO2 numbers and you don't get the result you want? It is idiocy, which your colleague unwittingly showed by bringing up this "evidence" of AGW, which shows the exact opposite. It was not me who brought this up- I am simply showing how ridiculous the contention is.


If you don't want to be shot down, don't bring up ridiculously false contentions.