Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-08-2019, 05:00 PM
 
Location: Denver CO
24,201 posts, read 19,219,950 times
Reputation: 38267

Advertisements

They need to have the investigation first. GOPers would be screaming bloody murder if they voted without investigating first, this is just a convenient excuse but it's not like any of you would be ok with it if they had voted either. The Constitution doesn't say they have to vote but it does say the House has the authority to impeach - Trump is the one trying to crap on the Constitution by claiming he has a right to decline to participate? No, he doesn't, he wasn't elected King.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-08-2019, 05:01 PM
 
Location: Florida
7,195 posts, read 5,729,801 times
Reputation: 12342
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbythegreat View Post
Yet every single time there has been an official impeachment inquiry of a president there has been a vote authorizing it. If they didn't really need one, why has it literally always happened?
Every single time we've had a President, they were not a Twitter troll. If Trump can be President and a Twitter troll, why has it literally never happened before?

See how that works? Just because something has been some way for some period of time, that doesn't mean that it's required to stay that way, especially when there's no law about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2019, 05:03 PM
 
8,957 posts, read 2,560,296 times
Reputation: 4725
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnotherTouchOfWhimsy View Post
Every single time we've had a President, they were not a Twitter troll. If Trump can be President and a Twitter troll, why has it literally never happened before?

See how that works? Just because something has been some way for some period of time, that doesn't mean that it's required to stay that way, especially when there's no law about it.
Ah, so it's acceptable to change the process to one that is inherently less fair and open than ever before because orange man bad? Is that your position on it?

Fair enough.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2019, 05:05 PM
 
30,443 posts, read 21,280,188 times
Reputation: 12000
Quote:
Originally Posted by saltine View Post
Because it's a sham
You got that right sam. The morons have nothing to go on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2019, 05:07 PM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,537,022 times
Reputation: 25816
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnotherTouchOfWhimsy View Post
Simply because they don't have to. It would require extra steps and there is no law that says they have to.
I agree. But that said - I wish they would just vote and get it over with. Nancy's done counting; if there are a handful in red states that wish to vote no - let them.

But I am MORE than ready to impeach. That said, Trump's cover up and refusal to cooperate with a co-equal branch of goverment just adds to the articles of impeachment that can be brought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbythegreat View Post
Yet every single time there has been an official impeachment inquiry of a president there has been a vote authorizing it. If they didn't really need one, why has it literally always happened?
Yet there is NOTHING in the constitution that requires it. Huh.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2019, 05:08 PM
 
Location: 89434
6,658 posts, read 4,749,349 times
Reputation: 4838
Quote:
Originally Posted by craigiri View Post
You just don't want to hold a crook responsible for his actions.
You let Hillary get away with Benghazi, Uranium One, rigging the primaries and deleting 30k emails that she was supposed to hand over to the state department.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2019, 05:08 PM
 
8,957 posts, read 2,560,296 times
Reputation: 4725
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
Yet there is NOTHING in the constitution that requires it. Huh.
Yet without it they lack the legitimacy to compel cooperation....which is why that kind of vote has literally always happened when it comes to authorizing official impeachment inquires of the president.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2019, 05:08 PM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,537,022 times
Reputation: 25816
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbythegreat View Post
Ah, so it's acceptable to change the process to one that is inherently less fair and open than ever before because orange man bad? Is that your position on it?

Fair enough.
Trump doesn't follow the laws; Trump doesn't follow the rules and precedents of our institutions; he sure as hell doesn't know what the constitution says - why should anyone else play by his rules?

It's not up to ANYONE but Congress as to how to hold their hearings; when to vote, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2019, 05:09 PM
 
15,534 posts, read 10,507,413 times
Reputation: 15815
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grlzrl View Post
Why aren't they voting on this?
Yeah, just do it, I'm beyond bored.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2019, 05:11 PM
 
10,513 posts, read 5,169,235 times
Reputation: 14056
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grlzrl View Post
Why aren't they voting on this?

When Nixon was impeached, an inquiry vote was taken because the House committees did not have subpoena power. The vote was needed to grant those powers. Several years ago, when the Republicans held the majority in the House, they voted a rule change that gave the majority permanent standing subpoena power. Therefore no inquiry vote is needed today because it would be redundant, the committee majority already has all the subpoena power they need.

Nothing in the Constitution requires a full House vote to initiate an impeachment inquiry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:54 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top