Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-29-2022, 12:17 PM
 
45,585 posts, read 27,209,359 times
Reputation: 23898

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post

The Hyde Amendment currently prohibits abortions from taking place on federal lands.
Quote:
Originally Posted by foodyum View Post
That is not what Hyde amendment says- it prohibits federal FUNDs to be used abortions. Not the same thing. Do you read the Hyde amendment and come up with that interpretation? Confused.
What's the difference? Are federal lands funded by an entity other than the federal government?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-29-2022, 12:36 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
2,033 posts, read 1,985,961 times
Reputation: 1437
Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
Poor women can't just take up and leave. They are the ones who are going to be affected the most by this. And these are just two democrats saying this. You really have no regard for women, do you.
Plenty of poor people that can’t by a $50K EV, plenty of poor people can’t afford $5-$6 gas plus retain other essentials in life. But they endure. So can a woman that seeks an abortion in other states.

It’s not as difficult as you portray it. These poor ladies aren’t having to wait for the next wagon train leaving Missouri to California.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2022, 12:50 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
2,033 posts, read 1,985,961 times
Reputation: 1437
Quote:
Originally Posted by foodyum View Post
That is not what Hyde amendment says- it prohibits federal FUNDs to be used abortions. Not the same thing. Do you read the Hyde amendment and come up with that interpretation? Confused.
Good luck finding any private company/enterprise willing to invest in the wholesale extermination of human life. I’m sure many stockholders will be clicking the sell tab in their brokerage accounts once the word is out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2022, 01:11 PM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,850 posts, read 26,301,017 times
Reputation: 34059
Quote:
Originally Posted by FatBob96 View Post
It would be a violation in the same way that private citizens putting a nativity scene in a public park would be a violation of the separation of church and state.

It's on public land
I think you are wrong, we aren't talking about a religious statue, but rather a non descript building.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2022, 01:13 PM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,850 posts, read 26,301,017 times
Reputation: 34059
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fastphilly View Post
Plenty of poor people that can’t by a $50K EV, plenty of poor people can’t afford $5-$6 gas plus retain other essentials in life. But they endure. So can a woman that seeks an abortion in other states.

It’s not as difficult as you portray it. These poor ladies aren’t having to wait for the next wagon train leaving Missouri to California.
You claimed: "it's not as difficult as you portray it" but you didn't bother to tell us how a poor woman would make her way from Missouri to California
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2022, 01:17 PM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,850 posts, read 26,301,017 times
Reputation: 34059
Quote:
Originally Posted by RowingFiend View Post
It's not a health clinic they're proposing. They want abortion clinics, which cannot be funded under the Hyde Amendment.
Abortion can't be funded, but health clinics that provide other services can get funding, just not for abortion
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2022, 01:18 PM
 
16,579 posts, read 20,718,061 times
Reputation: 26860
Quote:
Originally Posted by RowingFiend View Post
I'm sure they'll find a way around the law. They're Democrats, it's what they do - ignore and circumvent the laws they don't agree with. They have no respect for our institutions, the rule of law, or anyone who disagrees with them.
We'll find a way around this SCT opinion. You can be sure about that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2022, 01:24 PM
 
7,150 posts, read 4,744,539 times
Reputation: 6505
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
You claimed: "it's not as difficult as you portray it" but you didn't bother to tell us how a poor woman would make her way from Missouri to California

She won't have to make yer way from Missouri to California. Illinois is right there.



I hope the result of this ruling is that adults become responsible for a change and practice birth control instead of relying on the habit (which they're calling a "right") of using abortion as birth control. What kind of moral decay have we put up with to get to that point.



Abortion should be rare, stated Bill Clinton. I agree.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2022, 01:29 PM
 
7,150 posts, read 4,744,539 times
Reputation: 6505
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marlow View Post
We'll find a way around this SCT opinion. You can be sure about that.

Try using birth control.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2022, 01:42 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
2,033 posts, read 1,985,961 times
Reputation: 1437
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
You claimed: "it's not as difficult as you portray it" but you didn't bother to tell us how a poor woman would make her way from Missouri to California
This is the same strawman argument made in the case of Voter ID laws that the poor will be put into a hardship of purchasing a $10-$20 state issue ID.

Technically the distance from any state at furthest is several hundred miles (the extreme southeast), most other locales are much closer.

“Poor” these days is somebody living in government housing with a 55” TV, iPhones. Etc.

Amazing how Dems are so concerned about the poor when their controlled cities have a tent pitched at every head turn.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top