Is Collapse of US Economy Underway or is it All Just Fear-mongering? (healthcare, Obama)

[ParkTwain]

Anti-democratic, hard money, small economy, anti-rationalist

[mcmastersteve]

If anyone has a couple of hours to watch this video seminar by DR. Chris Martenson, he does an excellent job talking in layman's terms about the problems with the U.S economy.
Watch it and decide for yourself, it's quite interesting
YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.

[jetgraphics]

Originally Posted by ParkTwain

Anti-democratic, hard money, small economy, anti-rationalist

1. Anti-democratic : as in pro-republican form is anti-democratic form? Shucks, that is the law of the land. (See Art.4, Sec.4, USCON)
2. hard money : Nope. Hard money is a mathematical paradox. No subset of a set can be a representative for the whole set.
3. small economy : Nope. Want equitable exchange, without usury. Prosperity is the creation, trade and transportation of surplus usable goods and services - and the time to enjoy same. I advocate More for Less, so more people can enjoy prosperity. Money is not wealth.
4. anti-rationalist : Not sure what is meant. Rationalism is "any view appealing to reason as a source of knowledge or justification". Since I base my views on written law, mathematics and science, I am not opposed to reason, but appeal to reason in my audience. Fat lot of good that will do me.

Your Score: 1 out of 4

[nightbird47]

Originally Posted by malamute

The thing is, grocery store shelves are constantly replenished. Two or three days without shipments arriving, some items will be gone.

If there are food shortages, or the food stamps don't arrive on time, the riots will start. People could probably stay relatively calm without new clothes, only the welfare crowd would riot over the loss of cable television. Teens would have a very difficult time without their cell phones but many would get through it.

I would not like to be in the city if electricity gets shut off at times. But food is the big thing.

There was a Teamsters Union Strike in So Cal in the 90's. The strike lasted over two months. The immediate effect within days was empty shelves. Anything perishable which did not come from somewhere close dissapeared.

Some of the chains closed some stores and combined so they had more to put on the shelf. They used non union drivers but this didn't fill the shelves even so. If anyone didn't understand how fragile our food supply is then this should have been a huge warning.

Whats picked in the field is on your store shelf tomorrow. The warehouses are gone. If for no other reason that for a natural disastor, people need to provide for their own welfare since the stores and the government will not be there.

[jetgraphics]

Originally Posted by nightbird47

If for no other reason that for a natural disastor, people need to provide for their own welfare since the stores and the government will not be there.

With all due respect, much of the disagreements and venting fail to address the underlying facts of the collapse.

1. The outstanding obligations (that which is owed to creditors and account holders) is a far greater sum than the amount of circulating medium of exchange. (I do not call it money, for it does not comply with law).

2. Pursuant to law, the only way NEW "dollar bills" are legally emitted, is by increasing the debt. In short, unless Congress goes deeper into debt, the "funny munny" supply cannot increase.

3. One of the major factors in triggering the subprime mortgage collapse was that the speculation finally drove up real estate prices to the point where the insufficient m.o.e. was exposed. Suddenly, there were no more "investors" with ready cash (nor credit) to continue the cycle of buy low, sell high, flip fast and bye bye.

4. As more investors try to "cash out", the pressure to come up with "dollar bills" is enormous. (Check the Federal Reserve M1 tally for Dec 2008)

5. Congress borrowed MORE than it paid in interest, in 2007 and 2008. It is servicing the debt with new investor's unmoney. That's why Bernie Madoff was arrested.

6. Under current conditions, the finite supply of "cash" has no proportionality with the marketplace (sum of all goods and services available for sale). Therefore, a disconnect exists, of such magnitude that it imperils commerce worldwide.

On a strict constitutional law basis, there is no solution.
[A] The 14th amendment states that the public debt cannot be questioned - even though it is insane.
[b] The limitation to precious metal coin as lawful money is mathematically unsound. A subset of a set can never be a representative for a whole set.
[C] Usury and usurers are not prohibited. Usury is mathematically impossible to pay in a finite money token system.

Possible solution:
Repeal 14th amendment, amend Art.1 Sec.8 and Sec. 10 to eliminate the exclusion of other mediums of exchange. Explicitly ban usury - or at the least - cease enforcing contracts for usury in a court of law.
Which would, in turn, abolish the public debt, for it is based on usury and impossible to pay. (All bonds and T-bills would be void and FRNs would cease to be legal tender)
Expand the power of the court to recognize contracts denominated in other than lawful money - such as private promissory notes, denominated in goods and services (ex: coupons). Once productive people and enterprises can emit notes denominated in what they can do or produce, the money token supply will be freed from the mathematical paradox that has plagued mankind for millennia.

And let us not forget abolishing national socialism, and canceling all entitlement programs. But since Socialist InSecurity is 100% voluntary, it would only need full disclosure about the facts of the program to encourage mass exodus.

[nightbird47]

Originally Posted by jetgraphics

With all due respect, much of the disagreements and venting fail to address the underlying facts of the collapse.

While I appreciate your long explanation, the basis of the collapse if housing and the basis of that is greed. The government created loans for people who couldn't afford them and the real estate industry ran with it. More sales, more income. People played the wishful thinking game and bought on things like stated income and by not reading contracts but *got* that house. Never mind it would triple in cost in two years. They'd manage. Flippers bought and flipped the cost of homes up in their own way too. The ones that got caught without a chair owe their misforturn only to their own greed. Those who loan money were more than willing to write loans to those who had pulses because when they crashed the loans would be fractionalized and bought up all over the world.

All greed. All unrealistic expectations. All no consideration of the future.

The whole "debt" cycle is unsupported in an economy which has fewer and fewer jobs. People do not buy when they don't have jobs. The service economy rests on the purchasing of goods which aren't being purchased.

The whole economy is balanced on bubbles which are eventually going to burst and have.

What I meant by the government can't come to help you is that when the SHTF they won't have the ability to. If we keep on pretending that we can continue to live with bubbles of air then that day will be coming sooner and sooner.

[JoeyT]

Someone here suggested a Jubilee where all debt would be forgiven. Since we are talking about levels of debt that defy description, I wonder if a global Jubilee is possible. Could all debt be wiped off the books, first in theory and then, if the numbers compute, in reality? I would venture to say that a sizeable portion of the world population is debt-free. Could we zero out all those computer entries, undergo a shakeout and then start over, this time with some reasonable rules prohibiting the kind of chicannery that got us here in the first place?

[SilverOne]

Denninger- puts it like it is- this is just an excerpt check link below for the rest of the story

The Market Ticker

If Taxcheating Timmy is unable or unwilling to discharge his duty as Secretary of the Treasury, I'll do the job. You probably wouldn't like how I'd do it, but I'd do it. Here's my prescription:

1. The memo goes out in the AM to every bank in America: No more lies. If you lie, even once, your bank gets seized and you will be criminally charged personally. Period. I am particularly interested in Mr. Lewis' claims on national television (CNBC) that Bank America had a "great" January. That sounds an awful lot like Dick Fuld who said he was going to "burn the shorts" and was "well-capitalized". Oh by the way, I'd refer Mr. Fuld's statements over to Justice immediately, along with everyone else who said something similar (Bear Stearns anyone?)
2. I would then amend OTS and OCC rules: All bank examinations are public data. All examinations must either have every asset marked to the market or the full model and data inputs must be disclosed, without exception.
3. Next, I would take the stage and give every bank in America 72 hours to disclose their current Tier Capital numbers under those rules. They have 'em in the possession of their Risk Manager. Let's have it. In public. You publish it, we print it. Everyone who is under-capitalized and has been hiding it - your shares are suspended. We'll get to you.
4. For those who are under-capitalized: If you have sufficient capital in your debt to be crammed down, that's what happens. Your common equity is gone. Preferred is crammed down, if that's insufficient it is gone. Next we do subordinateds, and repeat until sufficient capital is restored. End of discussion.
5. For those who cannot be crammed down we seize you. Your deposits and good assets are auctioned off to sound institutions, spread among the physical locations of those assets and deposits so no concentration of more than 5% in one bank occurs. The rest of the assets go the FDIC and are run down or auctioned off as they deem appropriate.
6. Any bank with more than 5% of the deposit base has 12 months to reduce it to under 5%. This affects fewer than 20 institutions.
7. No bank may transact in any instrument that is (1) not a whole loan or (2) is not traded on an exchange. Period. Any such "assets" currently held must be disposed of within six months. No exceptions. I recognize that this makes banks a "utility" - entities that take deposits and make loans. So what? Its a good and profitable business, has been for hundreds of years, and forces proper underwriting since you must retain the risk.
8. Any bank that finds (7) onerous (and most will) is free to split itself into two firms, one a bank and the second a non-bank affiliate held by the parent. The affiliate may not utilize depositor capital or otherwise be cross-contaminated with bank assets and support, but is of course free to raise money via debt offerings in the marketplace such as it is. Said non-bank firm may trade in whatever it would like, however, it will not receive any government support of any kind. Cross-contamination of any sort between a regulated bank and a non-bank sub will be treated and prosecuted as bank fraud. Any existing "affiliate" bank credit lines must be extinguished within 90 days and "23A letters" are explicitly disallowed.
9. Reserve ratios are set at 8% with no exceptions.
10. Bernanke will do as the above directs without complaint or I will exercise my lawful and Constitutional authority to issue United States Notes, bypassing The Fed entirely. Ben and The Fed work under my direction, not the other way around. End of discussion.
11. Any bank that does not want TARP money may repay it immediately. If you keep it, no employee may receive total compensation exceeding that of the President of The United States, without exception and in all forms, including stock, options as valued under Black-Scholes, deferred compensation, benefits and cash. Period. You are working for us, therefore we set your salaries.

There 'ya go. Cards on the table, face up. No bull****. If you're broke, you're broke. We'll protect depositors and everyone else can twist in the wind. Those who are bankrupt must be recognized as bankrupt so the system can clear and the market can function.

[jetgraphics]

Originally Posted by nightbird47

While I appreciate your long explanation, the basis of the collapse if housing and the basis of that is greed. The government created loans for people who couldn't afford them and the real estate industry ran with it. More sales, more income. People played the wishful thinking game and bought on things like stated income and by not reading contracts but *got* that house. Never mind it would triple in cost in two years. They'd manage. Flippers bought and flipped the cost of homes up in their own way too. The ones that got caught without a chair owe their misforturn only to their own greed. Those who loan money were more than willing to write loans to those who had pulses because when they crashed the loans would be fractionalized and bought up all over the world.

All greed. All unrealistic expectations. All no consideration of the future.

The whole "debt" cycle is unsupported in an economy which has fewer and fewer jobs. People do not buy when they don't have jobs. The service economy rests on the purchasing of goods which aren't being purchased.

The whole economy is balanced on bubbles which are eventually going to burst and have.

What I meant by the government can't come to help you is that when the SHTF they won't have the ability to. If we keep on pretending that we can continue to live with bubbles of air then that day will be coming sooner and sooner.

It's far worse than what you allude to.

The U.S. Congress went bust in 1933.
We've lived for over 3 generations under a perpetual "temporary" state of emergency, first declared by FDR.

The insanity will not end until they destroy the USA.

[jetgraphics]

Before entering into verbal combat, let us hone our tools of discernment and vocabulary.

Can we agree that we do not wish to be robbed nor killed?
Good.
We share the concept that our right to life, the fruits of our labor and that which we acquire are ours, and not subject to anyone else.

Do we agree that cooperation in support and defense of our rights is a good thing?
Good.
So a government formed in mutual defense of our rights to life, liberty and property is acceptable.

According to the Declaration of Independence, governments are instituted among men to (a) secure rights, and (b) govern by consent of the governed.

Is that acceptable to all?

If you haven't given consent to be governed, all government is authorized to do is use its awesome power in support of your right to life, liberty, private property and other sundry rights, not explicitly mentioned.

And as part of your right to life, do you have the inalienable right to engage in any harmless activity that supports that right to life?
Yes.

Now we're getting close to the "good stuff".

If you haven't given consent to be governed, and not submitted yourself (and your property) to the government, then the government is your servant.
Is that acceptable?

"Government is not Sovereignty. Government is the machinery or expedient for expressing the will of the sovereign power." City of Bisbee v. Cochise County, 78 P. 2d 982, 986, 52 Ariz. 1

Excellent! The government agrees with us, so far.

But what is a sovereign and what is sovereignty?

SOVEREIGN - A person, body or state in which independent and supreme authority is vested...
Black's Law Dictionary Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 1395.

SOVEREIGNTY - ...By "Sovereignty", in its largest sense is meant supreme, absolute, uncontrollable power, the absolute right to govern.
Black's Law Dictionary Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 1396.

Who or what is the sovereign power, if the government is not sovereignty?

"People are supreme, not the state."
Waring v. the Mayor of Savannah, 60 GA at 93.

"The people of the state, as the successors of its former sovereign, are entitled to all the rights which formerly belonged to the king by his own prerogative."
Lansing v. Smith, (1829) 4 Wendell 9, (NY)

"At the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people and they are truly the sovereigns of the country."
Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 Dall. 440, 463

Do you agree that the PEOPLE are sovereign?
Good.

Let's figure out what the government is.

"...In America, however, the case is widely different. Our government is founded upon compact. Sovereignty was, and is, in the people."
Glass vs The Sloop Betsey, 3 Dall 6 (1794)

What compact?

"But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in Court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution, it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it. The States are the parties to it....."
- - -Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. Mayor and Alderman, City of Savannah, 14 Ga. 438, 520 (1854) Supreme Court of Georgia

The U.S. Constitution is a compact between the States united and the United States, in Congress assembled.

Wait, aren't "we, the people" part of that compact?

Not if you're a private person, and one of the sovereign people.

Why?

"... the term 'citizen,' in the United States, is analogous to the term "subject" in the common law; the change of phrase has resulted from the change in government. ... he who before was a "subject of the King" is now a citizen of the State."
State v. Manuel, 20 N.C. 144 (1838)

"CITIZEN - ... Citizens are members of a political community who, in their associative capacity, have established or submitted themselves to the dominion of government for the promotion of the general welfare and the protection of their individual as well as collective rights. "
- - - Black's Law Dictionary,Sixth Ed. p.244

"SUBJECT - One that owes allegiance to a sovereign and is governed by his laws.
...Men in free governments are subjects as well as citizens; as citizens they enjoy rights and franchises; as subjects they are bound to obey the laws. The term is little used, in this sense, in countries enjoying a republican form of government."
- - - Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 1425

Wait a minute - the government said it wasn't the sovereign, and that people were sovereign.
Who is a subject / citizen?
He who has established or submitted himself to the dominion of government is a citizen. He has given consent to be governed, in exchange for political liberties (voting and holding office).

Wait - there's an exception with respect to a "republican form of government"!
Good observation.

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion;
[United States Constitution, Article 4, Section 4]

REPUBLICAN (form of) GOVERNMENT. One in which the powers of sovereignty are vested in the people and are exercised by the people, ... directly,....
In re Duncan, 139 U.S. 449, 11 S.Ct. 573, 35 L.Ed. 219;
Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162, 22 L.Ed. 627.
- - - Black's Law Dictionary

In a republican form of government, the people are sovereign. The servant government, and its subject citizens, are delegated certain powers to secure the rights of the sovereign people.

Is that clear?
In America, the people are sovereign. But by consent, a private person can change his status, and submit himself to government, as a citizen.

Did you think you were born a "U.S. citizen"?
Who told you that?
It's not in the law.

"A Sovereign cannot be named in any statute as merely a 'person' or 'any person'".
Wills v. Michigan State Police, 105 L.Ed. 45 (1989)

"In common usage, the term 'person' does not include the sovereign, [and] statutes employing the [word] are ordinarily construed to exclude it."
Wilson v. Omaha Indian Tribe, 442 U.S. 653, 667, 61 L.Ed2. 153, 99 S.Ct. 2529 (1979)
(quoting United States v. Cooper Corp. 312 U.S. 600, 604, 85 L.Ed. 1071, 61 S.Ct. 742 (1941)).

"All PERSONS born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." [14th Amendment, Section 1.]

Uh oh... Sovereign Americans are not persons subject to nor object of the governing power of the servant government.

What proof exists that there are people who are NOT citizens?

"The better to secure and perpetuate mutual friendship and intercourse among the people of the different states in this union, the free inhabitants of each of these states,..., shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several
states; ..."
[Article IV of the Articles of Confederation (1777)]

Did you think "everybody" born in the U.S.A. was a U.S. citizen residing at a residence?

What's an inhabitant (as in free inhabitant)?

"INHABITANT - One who resides actually and permanently in a given place, and has his domicile there."
- - - Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p.782

"DOMICILE - A person's legal home. That place where a man has his true, fixed, and permanent home and principal establishment, and to which whenever he is absent he has the intention of returning."
- - - Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p.484

"RESIDENCE - Place where one actually lives ... Residence implies something more than physical presence and something less than domicile. The terms 'resident' and 'residence' have no precise legal meaning... [One can have many residences
but only one domicile]
- - - Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p.1308, 1309

U.S. citizens who reside at residences do not have legal, permanent homes. Coincidentally, no state issues "resident" licenses (permissions) to non-resident inhabitants domiciled in their state. In fact, inhabitants don't need permission, because they're not transients and trespassers. They have the RIGHT to be in the state and use the public roads and waterways.

Check your own state's constitution and laws for mention of the inhabitant and his superior status.

" No inhabitant of this state shall be molested in person or property ... on account of religious opinions..."
- - - Georgia Constitution, Article 1, Sec.1, Paragraph 4

If your religious opinions forbid you to enroll into national socialism, accept numbering, or engage in usury, you cannot be molested for your choice... in Georgia. And if you think they were not aware of the difference between inhabitants and residents, read this:

"Citizens, protection of.
All citizens of the United States, resident in this state, are hereby declared citizens of this state; and it shall be the duty of the General Assembly to enact such laws as will protect them in the full enjoyment of the rights, privileges, and immunities due to such citizenship."
- - - Georgia Constitution, Art 1, Sec.1, Paragraph 7

Recapping, the government is not sovereign, but servant to the sovereign people. However, citizens are subjects of the sovereign government. Since involuntary servitude is unconstitutional (except after conviction), the compulsory civic duties associated with citizenship are empowered by consent of the governed. You DID give consent, knowingly, willingly and intentionally, didn't you? You did sign many government documents where you claimed to be a citizen and a resident, didn't you?

If you were a victim of fraud or constructive fraud, you have the right to object, and change your status at law. But once you leave, don't ever submit again, for then it would be a permanent and irrevocable election, and no objection will hold up.

PART TWO - Disinformation Eradication
America's republican form of government, in which the people are sovereign is in harmony with capitalism. But let us be clear on what capitalism really means.

CAPITALISM - An economic system in which the means of production, distribution and exchange are privately owned and operated for private profit.
- - - Webster's Dictionary

A farmer who owns his farm enjoys capitalism.
A laborer who owns the fruits of his labor enjoys capitalism.
A merchant who distributes products for profit enjoys capitalism.

PRIVATE PROPERTY - "As protected from being taken for public uses, is such property as belongs absolutely to an individual, and of which he has the exclusive right of disposition. Property of a specific, fixed and tangible nature, capable of being in possession and transmitted to another, such as houses, lands, and chattels."
- - - Black's Law dictionary, sixth ed., p.1217

If you concatenate capitalism with private property, you can see the "inconvenient truth".

Capitalism is an economic system in which the means of production, distribution and exchange are absolutely owned by individuals and operated for their individual profit.

Anything else is NOT capitalism, including usury (which likes to call its nefarious scheme "capitalizing"). Enemies of the sovereign people, who absolutely own themselves, their property, and exercise natural and personal liberty, seek to STEAL them and their property.

In American law, we know that the constitutional government has promised to secure private property rights.

Amendment V, US Constitution 1789

... nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

From the Communist manifesto:

"In this sense, the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property."

COMMUNISM - the ownership of property, or means of production, distribution and supply, by the whole of a classless society, with wealth shared on the principle of 'to each according to his need', each yielding fully 'according to his ability'.
- - - Webster's Dictionary.

SOCIALISM - A political and economic theory advocating collective ownership of the means of production and control of distribution. It is based upon the belief that all, while contributing to the good of the community, are equally entitled to the care and protection which the community can provide.
--- Webster's dictionary

So let us be crystal clear - left wing socialist / communist pirates who wish to rob property owners, via taxation, are enemies of the sovereign people. And usurers, who also wish to rob property owners, via their scheme, are not part of capitalism. In fact, they are in alliance with these scurrilous scoundrels.

These thieves are opposed to any law that secures property rights, and government that espouses the ideal of securing property rights from attack.

HOW YOU WERE SWINDLED

Form SS-5, application for an account and number with Social Security is explicitly limited to U.S. citizens and U.S. residents. American nationals, free inhabitants, domiciled within the boundaries of the United States of America are ineligible to participate - and would not wish to.

Every participant in national socialism has surrendered his birthright to absolutely own private property, including himself. Each socialist has accepted the burden to be equally liable for the impossible public debt (See the definition for "contribution" in any legal dictionary) via the Federal Insurance CONTRIBUTION Act / Social Security Act of 1935. He has consented to be a "human resource" pledged as collateral on the debt. As one who is eligible for entitlements (charity) from the public treasury, each "volunteer" is a pauper, and thus a status criminal. Failure to pay his "fair share" of socialist taxes, will result in confiscation of his property (no longer protected from being taken for public use), and no just compensation will be given. Socialist Americans are incapable of owning private property.

In case you were unaware, Federal Reserve Notes (aka "dollar bills") are not dollars. They are authorized under the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, as codified in Title 12, USC sec. 411.

TITLE 12,UNITED STATES CODE, CHAPTER 3,SUBCHAPTER XII,sec. 411. Issuance to reserve banks; nature of obligation; redemption
" Federal reserve notes, to be issued at the discretion of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for the purpose of making advances to Federal reserve banks through the Federal reserve agents as hereinafter set forth and for no other purpose, are authorized. The said notes shall be OBLIGATIONS of the United States and shall be receivable by all national and member banks and Federal reserve banks and for all taxes, customs, and other public dues. They shall be redeemed in LAWFUL MONEY on demand at the Treasury Department of the United States, in the city of Washington, District of Columbia, or at any Federal Reserve bank."

FRNs are obligations of the U.S. government to pay lawful money on demand.

LAWFUL MONEY - "The terms 'lawful money' and 'lawful money of the United States' shall be construed to mean gold or silver coin of the United States..."
Title 12 United States Code, Sec. 152.

Federal Reserve Notes are issued under the authority of Art 1 Sec 8 power to borrow on the credit of the United States.

Article 1, Section 8. U.S. Constitution.
The Congress shall have Power
...To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;

But the notes were repudiated in House Joint Resolution 192, (June 1933). Congress will no longer guarantee the 'exchange rate' of the dollar (for each FRN). But the law still defines the national debt (in excess of 10 trillion dollars) in terms of gold. That computes to a sum of 500 billion ounces gold. Which is 100 times as much gold as is estimated to exist, above ground, in the world.

And Congress cannot question the public debt because of the 14th amendment, even when it is insane.

Amendment 14, Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, ..., shall not be questioned.

Now if you've followed this so far, you're aware that somehow, Americans were all persuaded that they needed to "join up" with national socialism before they were allowed to work in their own country. And that government "gave away" entitlements to all enumerated Americans. And that all we need to do is just elect the RIGHT group of public servants and everything will be fine.

Hopefully, you now will be better able to discount the propaganda and disinformation that has been fed to you from your birth.

The servant government is incapable of resolving the problems that are propelling the USA into collapse. Partly because of the constitutional limitations, and partly due to their contracts with usurers.

Partisan fighting and "wing" alliances will not resolve the problem. Since 1933, the U.S. Congress has been bankrupt. Since 1935, the USA has been marching to the tune of national socialism, slowly eroding the memory of absolute ownership and inalienable rights from the minds of each successive generation.

We are at a threshold of collapse. And after we pass that portal, I fear that too many people are so ignorant of their American birthright, that the enemies of the sovereign people will be victorious. Do not be deceived, government has acted helpless to make the problems worse, not better. It was all part of the plan to destroy the compacts that created the United States of America and substitute a new and improved "Socialist" compact.

Either you are FOR private property rights, or you are a pirate, seeking to TAKE private property rights. No matter what label, flag or doctrine is raised as the goal - either you are a harmless producer or you are a harmful predator. Choose carefully.

The REAL law protects property rights. And EVIL hates that law, and seeks to replace it with policy that is built upon fraudulent consent.

Sovereign people do not care who is the servant as long as he complies with his oath of office, and restrains himself within the limitations of the explicit delegation of power.
But if you're one of the subject peoples, be aware that your subjugation was entirely YOUR FAULT - according to the public record. Fighting about the inequities, tyranny, and unpleasant conditions of your servitude is futile. He who consents cannot complain. The government is absolved of all blame - because they have the written proof - in the public record.

The only nation on this planet with a republican form of government is the United States of America. And America is the only nation where the people are sovereign, and not subjects of servant government. If the people do not educate themselves to their lost heritage, this solitary experiment in true self government will pass into history, and be forgotten.

Go read the law, yourself.
It's available in every county courthouse law library.

I don't know about you, but there is no sum of money nor title of nobility that would ever persuade me to bend a knee or bow in subjugation to another monarch or sovereign, now that I know what my true birthright is. We were born to be Kings and Queens, monarchs of our lives and destinies. Our enemies have perverted generations, and polluted our language so that we may not recognize our tormentors. But I hope that someday, enough Americans awaken to their lost heritage. For when that day arrives, the heavens will rock with their exultation.