Has gay marriage ever been voted for by the people anywhere? (parade, gay people)

[karfar]

Originally Posted by Lakewooder

karfar we need to have some wine sometime! Did you say you like pinot? LOL.

Absolutely!

[Sonrise]

Originally Posted by Lakewooder

So if gays were the majority, would you want them voting on heterosexual marriage?

Uh....that's a statistical and biological impossibility.

[karfar]

Originally Posted by Sonrise

Uh....that's a statistical and biological impossibility.

So you're not going to even attempt to answer the question. Why, is the thought so horrifying for you?

[Sonrise]

Originally Posted by karfar

Are you serious??? Can't you see the arm flapping from here? Double standards my friend, double standards...that's what the haters live by.

Hater, as defined by Karfar: Anyone that doesn't agree with all of my opinions on everything, all of the time.

[Sonrise]

Originally Posted by karfar

So you're not going to even attempt to answer the question. Why, is the thought so horrifying for you?

It's an absurdity. Gays can never be the majority population, society would cease to exist.

[eastwesteastagain]

Originally Posted by boiseguy

civil rights are an issue of the courts.. NOT the voting public...
The courts must look at the law, and hear the complaints and evidence on both sides of the issue to determine how the issue should be handled against the laws and protections of the land.
The voting public doesn't get a say on something that doesn't effect them. Gay marriage does not effect them. IT DOESNT

whether something is taught in schools or promoted elsewhere is a separate issue... the very act of two consenting adults being recognized by the law in the same manner everyone else is it's own issue and an issue of equality...

I think you're right - this is a civil rights issue and should be treated as such.

[karfar]

Originally Posted by Sonrise

Hater, as defined by Karfar: Anyone that doesn't agree with all of my opinions on everything, all of the time.

You got it!

Originally Posted by Sonrise

It's an absurdity. Gays can never be the majority population, society would cease to exist.

What's absurd about answering a hypothetical question? Why can't you do it?

[Maineah]

Originally Posted by karfar

You got it!

What's absurd about answering a hypothetical question? Why can't you do it?

Many of us so called haters were not that way until we found the world was filling up with people like you.

[karfar]

Originally Posted by Maineah

Many of us so called haters were not that way until we found the world was filling up with people like you.

I don't understand, can you spell out what kind of people I am?

[Joe_Ryder]

Originally Posted by karfar

What's absurd about answering a hypothetical question? Why can't you do it?

Theres a huge difference between hypothetical and non sequitur. Since the question you posed was based on a nearly impossible situation, it's non sequitur. A Hypothetical question would be about something that could actually happen.

If you had instead chosen bisexual instead of homosexual, it would have been borderline hypothetical since though unlikely, would actually be possible. Since humans can't reproduce asexually and are not immortal, a homosexual majority is beyond any reasonable probability. No answer would either prove or disprove your point.