Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Would you support the South seceding from the Union?
Yes, strongly support 88 33.08%
Yes, support 30 11.28%
Don't care either way 33 12.41%
No, oppose 17 6.39%
No, strongly oppose 98 36.84%
Voters: 266. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-24-2010, 12:16 AM
 
Location: Pasadena
7,411 posts, read 10,391,849 times
Reputation: 1802

Advertisements

Some people don't want the South to secede because it is American land & if a few Southerns want to have their own country they need to leave and find their own country. Some people want the South to secede because they do not like "atypical" Southerns who are Bible-belt nuts\ anti-intellectual & racists. Southerns who want to secede [and there are very few of them] have a serious inferiority complex & hate the ridicule of the rest of the U.S. These are not healthy people with huge issues of race & economic standing. Basically insecure people who are very unhappy with themselves. That's why these Americans need the rest of the country to make decisions for them because their own judgment is horrible and dangerous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-24-2010, 12:30 AM
 
Location: Bradenton, Florida
27,232 posts, read 46,663,996 times
Reputation: 11084
Or they simply don't like the Feds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2010, 02:01 AM
 
Location: Midwest City, Oklahoma
14,848 posts, read 8,210,859 times
Reputation: 4590
Quote:
Originally Posted by californio sur View Post
Some people don't want the South to secede because it is American land & if a few Southerns want to have their own country they need to leave and find their own country. Some people want the South to secede because they do not like "atypical" Southerns who are Bible-belt nuts\ anti-intellectual & racists. Southerns who want to secede [and there are very few of them] have a serious inferiority complex & hate the ridicule of the rest of the U.S. These are not healthy people with huge issues of race & economic standing. Basically insecure people who are very unhappy with themselves. That's why these Americans need the rest of the country to make decisions for them because their own judgment is horrible and dangerous.
You do realize that there are more than just Southerners who want to secede, right? In fact, the first area of the country that wanted to secede were the New Englanders(and they were pretty close to it). If it had seceded at the time, neither the north or the south could have maintained itself as a sovereign nation for very long. If New England had seceded, Britain would have swallowed it back up easily in 1812. After that, the south would also be picked off pretty quickly.

The reason the thirteen colonies were held together "perpetually" by the articles of confederation, was because they could not have remained free on their own. Many concessions were made in the declaration of independence(like no condemning slavery) just so the Southern states would join in on the rebellion.

In the Articles of confederation(the only document that talks about the union being perpetual), all power was handed to the states, the federal government was pretty much a voluntary post with absolutely no control of anything. If our constitution would have been presented instead of the Articles of Confederation in 1777, there wouldn't have been a union to begin with. And if our constitution mentioned anything about perpetual union, there is no way it would have been ratified by the colonies in 1788.

The individual states were originally very culturally distinct, the only reason the colonies were United in the beginning, was for their common defense.

The creation of the constitution was to address what was dividing and weakening the union. Without the constitution, the country would have fallen apart, and would have been easily picked off by Britain or France or both. In Shays rebellion, the federal government had absolutely no authority or funds to put down the rebellion. It became very apparent that without a central military that could fund itself, that the union could easily be picked off. Secondly, each state having separate tariffs, but free-trade within the colonies, was allowing British and French traders to avoid high tariffs in one state by selling cheap goods through another states ports that has low tariffs. It works almost like Nafta, where other countries bring goods in through Mexico, and Mexico sells them to us, with no tariffs.

The constitution was created with a very limited purpose, that was clearly defined. There are absolutely none of the founding fathers who could have EVER believed that their constitution would be used to create affirmative action, hate-crime legislation, social security, welfare, free healthcare, gun ownership restrictions, etc. And I highly doubt they would be very happy with the unconstitutional 14th amendment, and direct taxation through the 16th amendment.

THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE 14th AMENDMENT
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2010, 07:46 AM
 
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
17,531 posts, read 24,701,378 times
Reputation: 9980
Quote:
Originally Posted by Desert kid View Post
Though that would depend if there is a U.S. to secede from if that day comes.
Oh Boo Hoo, Democracy too much if you can't be in charge?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2010, 08:39 AM
 
10,239 posts, read 19,610,755 times
Reputation: 5943
Quote:
No, I said they joined the military to get away from Rednecks and from grinding poverty. Both very valid reasons for doing so.
You know this for certain, do you? LOL Please support this statement beyond your own desperate desire to believe it...?

But as it is, here is what you said:
Quote:
"No, they're victims of racism and they are poor. The whites from the south who join only get to claim one of those.

Quote:
The record at Appomattox speaks for itself. Lee begged for food and Grant gave it to him. I've given you proof. You choose to ignore it.
You gave no proof he "begged" at all. YOU have chosen to ignore what actually transpired. Lee didn't beg nor whine. Those might be colorful verbs to support your warped vision of what actually took place, but they only fool those with no prior knowledge of the exchange. Grant offered rations. Lee accepted. What is so hard to understand about that?

Quote:
Providing you with proof does little good, but here goes: In your post # 199 you claimed that "...mostly southern men and women protected you from having been conquered by Nazi Germany..." This in spite of the fact that we had a draft that applied to everybody. Unless, of course, your claim is that the South has more people than the North, East, and West combined.

In your post #206 you repeated the fiction that "...the South makes up the relative majority of those in the military..."
Yes, and I have stated it repeatedly. A disporportionate number of men/women from the South have always been part of the United States armed forces. But...ok...I will admit I should probably have been clearer on the terminology. However, I figured even you would get the import. But apparently not, so let me retract and state for the record:

Southerners (black and white) have always made up a disproportionate number of those in military service. Satisfied?

Quote:
No fair qualifying your statement now. Besides which, doesn't the election of Barack Obama provide you good ol' boys with all the justification you need?
Race card again...

Quote:
So, as long as we can have a United States where slavery is allowed, women can't vote, and the South can control the national agenda, your willing to stay in the Union. Got it. No thanks.
There is no answer to such lunatic statements as this. LMAO

Last edited by TexasReb; 01-24-2010 at 09:18 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2010, 08:41 AM
 
10,239 posts, read 19,610,755 times
Reputation: 5943
[quote=Redshadowz;12585820]
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasReb View Post

You have to understand Tex, anytime a liberal hears that you want to uphold the constitution and states rights as envisioned by the founding fathers, you are automatically labeled a racist, who wants to bring back slavery, and oppress women.

These liberals have no idea what the constitution says, or what was intended. They don't understand that the constitution was intentionally made to put limits on the federal government. Which is why the powers of congress were listed as "finite and precise" as the enumerated powers in article 1 section 8. But these powers are not good enough for liberals, so they believe we should stack the supreme court with "empathic" judges that will interpret their socialist/marxist agenda as constitutional.

They say they uphold the constitution, but that is all for show. They see the constitution as just a symbol of oppression, and try to circumvent and abuse it at every turn. Commerce clause anyone?
Right on the mark, Redshadowz! Keep up your good work!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2010, 12:02 PM
 
181 posts, read 338,989 times
Reputation: 318
Quote:
Originally Posted by californio sur View Post
Some people don't want the South to secede because it is American land & if a few Southerns want to have their own country they need to leave and find their own country. Some people want the South to secede because they do not like "atypical" Southerns who are Bible-belt nuts\ anti-intellectual & racists. Southerns who want to secede [and there are very few of them] have a serious inferiority complex & hate the ridicule of the rest of the U.S. These are not healthy people with huge issues of race & economic standing. Basically insecure people who are very unhappy with themselves. That's why these Americans need the rest of the country to make decisions for them because their own judgment is horrible and dangerous.
Southern California attempted to secede from California, so the above applies to that area as well?....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2010, 12:07 PM
 
Location: Pasadena
7,411 posts, read 10,391,849 times
Reputation: 1802
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissDollie View Post
Southern California attempted to secede from California, so the above applies to that area as well?....
Please cite where you are getting your information.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2010, 12:24 PM
 
900 posts, read 673,185 times
Reputation: 299
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasReb View Post
You know this for certain, do you? LOL Please support this statement beyond your own desperate desire to believe it...?

But as it is, here is what you said:




You gave no proof he "begged" at all. YOU have chosen to ignore what actually transpired. Lee didn't beg nor whine. Those might be colorful verbs to support your warped vision of what actually took place, but they only fool those with no prior knowledge of the exchange. Grant offered rations. Lee accepted. What is so hard to understand about that?

You choose to ignore Lee's whining, which I have proven, then there's not much I can do about it. As I said, Grant should never have provided them food.



Yes, and I have stated it repeatedly. A disporportionate number of men/women from the South have always been part of the United States armed forces. But...ok...I will admit I should probably have been clearer on the terminology. However, I figured even you would get the import. But apparently not, so let me retract and state for the record:

Southerners (black and white) have always made up a disproportionate number of those in military service. Satisfied?

Simply not true. And I can think of one four year period in our history where they made up 0% of the military. As I recall, we did OK without their services.



Race card again...


Expect it, when you offer racist comments.


There is no answer to such lunatic statements as this. LMAO

But that's exactly your position. You'd like us to go back to the good ol' days of the founding fathers, when southerners set the national agenda, black people were slaves, and women were unable to participate. Then, and only then, you'll consider staying in the Union.

No thanks. Leave now. Please.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2010, 12:25 PM
 
900 posts, read 673,185 times
Reputation: 299
Quote:
Originally Posted by californio sur View Post
Please cite where you are getting your information.
This is one of those comments that they throw out from time to time. It must come from one of those "South's A-gonna Rise Agin'" websites.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:49 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top