Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
My point is the government has its tentacles in every aspect of the business world... do you really want the WH dictating what is acceptable communications between private companies and their customers? Never has any administration meddled with private business to the same degree that this one has. Would you be equally comfortable with this if there was a republican in the WH telling private companies how to communicate with their customers?
Yes, that was a rhetorical question, you need not answer.
My point is the government has its tentacles in every aspect of the business world... do you really want the WH dictating what is acceptable communications between private companies and their customers? Never has any administration meddled with private business to the same degree that this one has. Would you be equally comfortable with this if there was a republican in the WH telling private companies how to communicate with their customers?
Yes, that was a rhetorical question, you need not answer.
I agree with the bolded and you should practice what you preach. Stop trying to justify libel which is illegal. The White House is not dictating anything. Reuters published false information and the WH brought it to their attention. I suppose you would do nothing if someone made a false statement about you and involved your job? You're full of it and yes if it was a Republican, I would still feel the same way and understand that they have the right to defend themselves when a false statement is made.
Quote:
Main Entry: 1li·bel
Pronunciation: \ˈlī-bəl\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, written declaration, from Anglo-French, from Latin libellus, diminutive of liber book
Date: 14th century 1 a: a written statement in which a plaintiff in certain courts sets forth the cause of action or the relief sought barchaic: a handbill especially attacking or defaming someone 2 a: a written or oral defamatory statement or representation that conveys an unjustly unfavorable impression b (1): a statement or representation published without just cause and tending to expose another to public contempt (2): defamation of a person by written or representational means (3): the publication of blasphemous, treasonable, seditious, or obscene writings or pictures (4): the act, tort, or crime of publishing such a libel
I agree with the bolded and you should practice what you preach. Stop trying to justify libel which is illegal. The White House is not dictating anything. Reuters published false information and the WH brought it to their attention. I suppose you would do nothing if someone made a false statement about you and involved your job? You're full of it and yes if it was a Republican, I would still feel the same way and understand that they have the right to defend themselves when a false statement is made.
I agree with ALL those tax increases for the rich. They ought to pay much more than they pay now.
Yeah, cause nearly 50% of their income isn't nearly enough.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
