Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-04-2010, 01:15 PM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,863,405 times
Reputation: 4585

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by saganista View Post
I ask again, what purpose was served by posting the pictures? What information pertinent to the actual thread topic was conveyed by them? There isn't any. The ONLY reason for posting the pictures was to carry the message of RACE...
The denying of their purpose is emblematic of a, yet resolved, problem in this Country, actually, many Countries.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-04-2010, 01:18 PM
 
19,198 posts, read 31,485,000 times
Reputation: 4013
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Dont pretend like they dont have a decent retirement package..
Are you aware of any reputable reference that equates the meanings of "fabulous" and "decent"?

Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
TEHN DONT APPLY FOR THE JOB if you dont want the pay!!
Ah, so you agree then that the salary of AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson should be reduced to $174,000 per year. If he deosn't like it, he doesn't have to stay on. And I'm sure you realize that this one single step alone would offset the great bulk of the loss that AT&T incurs from being no longer able to deduct the federal subsidies for their retiree prescription drug plans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2010, 01:20 PM
 
Location: South Fla
9,644 posts, read 9,850,172 times
Reputation: 1942
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedyAZ View Post
Wait wait wait, just because the OP posted pictures of the 15 members who voted for a pay raise does not make him racist. Just because someone stated the obvious that 13/15 of them are colored does not make anyone racist here. I think you're a bit quick to call someone a racist, just because I hate Obama does not make me racist. He could be white and I would still hate him.
Where have you been?

Not voting for Obama, Not agreeing with Obamas policies, Being a republican, not being a political hack for the democrat party all makes people a racist now. Well at least according to many liberals. Anyone that does not support Obama is a racist. ( according to many liberals)

You dont have to actually be a racist to be called or labeled one
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2010, 01:30 PM
 
19,198 posts, read 31,485,000 times
Reputation: 4013
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
It amazes me how much some people will try to put a square peg into a round hole.

If you buy handcrafted soda you are not being gouged, as they have limited advertising costs.
Economies are webs and networks of interdependencies. Do you go to the bottling plant to buy your expensive sugar water or do you procure it at some nearby retail outlet. Either way, automotive and petroleum products will have been used to hook the two of you up. Are you aware of any advertising being conducted by automotive or petroleum companies? Do you need a lot more examples to comprehend the point? There is no one else to pay the costs of advertsing but US, and you are one of US.

Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
Is there an organic healthy alternative to our empty calorie congresspeople?
Yes. The people of Demmark are widely reported to be the happiest people in the world. They are all Socialists, but maybe you would get used to it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2010, 01:35 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,291,205 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by saganista View Post
Economies are webs and networks of interdependencies. Do you go to the bottling plant to buy your expensive sugar water or do you procure it at some nearby retail outlet. Either way, automotive and petroleum products will have been used to hook the two of you up. Are you aware of any advertising being conducted by automotive or petroleum companies? Do you need a lot more examples to comprehend the point? There is no one else to pay the costs of advertsing but US, and you are one of US.
yawn. The local farmers' market makes their own soda. No advertising costs from them to me, period.

Quote:
Yes. The people of Demmark are widely reported to be the happiest people in the world. They are all Socialists, but maybe you would get used to it.
Yes, in Denmark everyone is equal. Some are just more equal than others.

Ain't happenin' in America sweetheart.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2010, 01:37 PM
 
19,198 posts, read 31,485,000 times
Reputation: 4013
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyanger View Post
Not trying to be obtuse, I just want to understand. So if I mostly just drink tap water filtered in a Brita filter-pitcher, I'm paying for the advertising budget of Pepsi?
Indirectly, because some of the people who sell things to you do drink Pepsi, and a small bit of the price you pay to them goes in turn to their purchase of Pepsi and therefore to support of Pepsi's advertising. Meanwhile, you are directly supporting the advertising of Brita...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2010, 01:40 PM
 
4,127 posts, read 5,069,193 times
Reputation: 1621
Quote:
Originally Posted by saganista View Post
Does it make sense to you to calmly fork over billions upon billion of dollars every year for advertising that does next to nothing for you, and then go ballistic over the idea of paying a measly extra million to the people who run your government for you??? Go ahead, tell me it does...

Does it make sense to compare apples to fish?

Again, I am not forced to purchase anything from private companies. If I choose to purchase their products then I obviously find value in their product. If they choose to reinvest their earning in advertisement, there's no issue. If I choose not to purchase their wares then I in no way contribute to their advertising budget.

When it comes to elected officials who offer no value for their product and actually force me to buy... Yes, I object. Your comparison is non sequitur.

And, could you please point out where I went ballistic? You're yet again making it up as you go.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2010, 01:41 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,291,205 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe_Ryder View Post
You're yet again making it up as you go.
It's called "good enough for government work"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2010, 01:42 PM
 
19,198 posts, read 31,485,000 times
Reputation: 4013
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
To be fair, their salary isnt really out of line with their job requirements, but it is odd to have them vote on their own paycheck..
Why would it be odd? The law provides for small automatic annual pay raises for Congress. If they don't vote at all, they get the pay raise. If they don't want to get the pay raise, how should they proceed?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2010, 01:42 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,135,461 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by saganista View Post
Ah, so you agree then that the salary of AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson should be reduced to $174,000 per year. If he deosn't like it, he doesn't have to stay on. And I'm sure you realize that this one single step alone would offset the great bulk of the loss that AT&T incurs from being no longer able to deduct the federal subsidies for their retiree prescription drug plans.
I agree that individuals should make what their supporters say they are worth. I dont own stock in ATT, so I have no opinion on their earnings other than to decide they are worth what ATT owners deem them worth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:29 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top