Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Does anyone here really believe people like the 'schoolhouse' shooters are doing so just because they've never gotten laid???????
This isn't a subject that in any way belongs on this forum.
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 36,989,150 times
Reputation: 40635
Quote:
Originally Posted by old_cold
Does anyone here really believe people like the 'schoolhouse' shooters are doing so just because they've never gotten laid???????
This isn't a subject that in any way belongs on this forum.
No one said 'just'. It's a symptom of anti socialness and a frustrator and anger booster.
Does anyone here really believe people like the 'schoolhouse' shooters are doing so just because they've never gotten laid???????
This isn't a subject that in any way belongs on this forum.
Now. Is that ACTUALLY the reason? No. The ACTUAL reason isn't that women are mean and won't give it up to guys. The ACTUAL reason is that the person is freakin' psychotic, antisocial and has drummed up this belief against women, or against whomever...and nobody stopped him by giving him a reality check. He was fully able to spin out of control, backed by other fringe wackadoos who agreed how right he was about women...about society...or whatever. 'Cause then it wasn't just him who felt this way. It was lots of people - why, just look all over the internet for proof, right?
The assertion a ways back in this thread was that men become extremely bitter because women reject them and that's a justifiable excuse. NO IT'S NOT, because even if it doesn't result in an actual mass shooting (and usually it doesn't), supporting it and red-pilling it anywhere...including on internet forums...gives justification for other forms of retribution. For example, beating a girl up. Or raping her. Sorry, but yeah. That stuff absolutely happens. Don't you ever wonder why? Do you believe this comes out of nowhere? Don't you ever hear such a story and ask yourself, "Why didn't somebody see that this guy was out of control and was thinking like a nut and was drumming up to doing something bad?"
'Cause I do.
Women going "oh no, so sorry" will not improve the situation. It will provide PROOF that the woman must have been wrong all along.Otherwise, why would they be "crawling" now and being so sweet? Vindication! See if this doesn't play out. Try it. I've tried being the accepting, there-there pat-pat one. It fuels the flames worse. It gives justification. Try it and see. Then report back to us.
* p.s. Sorry this came from the Daily Fail but at least it's verifiable. As we all probably know. Famous story.
Too much men allow women to have sexual power over them. The more that men become non obsessed with sex the happier they'll be. If more men were willing to call women out on sexual harassment and harassment in general the less women will feel they can hold their 'beauty' over men's heads. If a man calls a woman he does not know beautiful or gives a flirty look she thinks he's a creep most of the time. So likewise if a woman gives men flirty stares or longer than comfortable stares or (in the rare case catcalls or say "hey your hot") the men should find that equally creepy and tell her to quit harassing him. If this attitude happened more among men they'd start to be less viewed as people that think with their penises too much.
I don't know.. what I'm trying to say is the same woman that would pull the sexual harassment card on a guy for something small would most likely be a woman that would think that if a single man refused her attention that he was a homo or a anti social weirdo. That's a double standard and just like men need to accept rejection with stride women need to learn to accept common placed rejection as much as men. That way there would be no contradictions or double standards present for either sex in these situations.
Does anyone here really believe people like the 'schoolhouse' shooters are doing so just because they've never gotten laid???????
This isn't a subject that in any way belongs on this forum.
The not getting laid is only one part of a much deeper issue. I didn’t get laid until I was 21 but never dreamed of even hurting anyone in high school. I had a lot of friends and acquaintances of both sexes, and got attention from girls but didn’t act on it until later because I was focused on finishing college. These guys who massacre because they “couldn’t get laid” are mentally ill narcissists, who once they are found out should have their pharmaceuticals taken away from them as they are immediately removed from society for long term evaluation.
As far as unsuccessful bitter men coming here to be heard....there will be no mass commiserating, that's flawed logic. They lost their way, Mgtow and Red Pill Inc, was 3 doors down. They come here looking for a debate they egotistically think will have merit, but illogically as this isn't the right audience. They are rejected by women, unknowingly express their all consuming contempt, and the worst want to get defensive with a nicely timed: "chics in my social circle dig me, though, it's just the old hags here I can't get along with."
Ok. Glutton for punishment, come on over and try to one-up the dumb wimmenz here after your daily dose of redpill.
I do something similar to you, Homina, but those people ask for, and expect, ACCEPT help in assimilating. It's a rewarding job.
Do you ever find that some of your favorite people to work with, the ones you really remember, are people who resist your efforts? I do. They really don't ask for or readily accept help. I mean they're asking for help at every turn, but not in so many words. And they fight our efforts. Those are the ones who stick with me.
Nah, that's a terrible idea. Why would you suggest that?
It won't make a difference with you, but I will try to explain: The definition of masculinity that needs to be redefined is the modern one influenced by porn, the one that combines sex, pornography, and the increased pressure on young men to live up to some mythical “player” status ... now pressurized by a thousand social media updates and dating apps.
Young Americans may not be having more sex than their parents did, but it's easy to see how a young guy can grow up believing the opposite. Sex is everywhere, but most people STILL don't really talk about it. So they internalize the messages that are dangerous: that sex is our most valuable social currency; that “boys will be boys”; that women are sluts if they put out, prudes if they don’t, and beyotches if they even dare to object.
Many young men are told that their value comes from their number of sex partners, and that is part of the same patriarchal structure that judges, values and punishes women for their sexual choices.
So you can keep throwing the word "feminist" around like it's a bad thing if you want to, but you're really only slighting yourself.
Yes I understand that redefining or reengineering men is a dream of ever man hating feminist...
Does anyone here really believe people like the 'schoolhouse' shooters are doing so just because they've never gotten laid???????
This isn't a subject that in any way belongs on this forum.
Of course not. But its a great opportunity to attack men, so why not.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
