Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
"Psssst! Hey buddy!Yah wanna buy a good watch cheap?
No? OK then... but... well, how's 'bout some special secret information I just found on my kid's laptop screen. He understands all of this, but I sure don't.
OK, OK... I'll sell it to yah real cheap. then you can appear to at'chuhlly unnerstand some stuff, an' everything!
Or this comment from that smart guy standin' over there:
"...the natural response from a young-Earth perspective is to claim that radiometric dating is inaccurate or untrustworthy. Unfortunately, while the young-Earthers are long on criticism, they are short on support.
It's easy to assert that radiometric methods don't work, but it's quite another thing to prove it. This the young-Earth creationist regularly fails to do."
Quite enough to knock YE on the head. Of course Geological dating and the methods such as radiometric dating pushed the dates back even further. Millions of years.
What this means in terms of the topic is that the geological effects and remains we see are due to millions of years of geological movement and not to a year of flood, as the apologists for the Biblical flood argue.
Didn't you hear? heinrich himmler gave musolini the "last piece of the ark" to Musolini who then threw it in a fire, toar of some wooden rubble from something, sent it back as a "piace of jesus cross" lol Himmler was quite insulted...
Math, through diligent application, will justify..) no global fludd, no single pair of a mere 3500 total list of "kinds" of species, yada yada yada... could possibly re-create an entirely safe and reproductively possible global ecology, esp. from a landing place on terra horrificulus montanus, @ the permanently glaciated 13k FASL, with no vegetation even with no fludd event!!
Also realizing that any vegetation below that all-ice level would of needs be dead from 18 months of semi-saline water inundation.
What a funny yuk-up! But... OK, OK... keep it up, all thou believers. Your extreme devotion is notable and noted! And hilarious!
__________________________________
So... what else can we have 'em buy into here, Manny? Gotta have sumthin' around here for a sort of spiritual yard sale, huh? Some old useless junk they'd still have to have? And true to our soiled biblical money-lender image, we can still make a bit on the side!
Hurry! Let's do it before they catch on!
_____________________________________
Math, through diligent application, will justify..) no global fludd, no single pair of a mere 3500 total list of "kinds" of species, yada yada yada... could possibly re-create an entirely safe and reproductively possible global ecology, esp. from a landing place on terra horrificulus montanus, @ the permanently glaciated 13k FASL, with no vegetation even with no fludd event!!
Also realizing that any vegetation below that all-ice level would of needs be dead from 18 months of semi-saline water inundation.
What a funny yuk-up! But... OK, OK... keep it up, all thou believers. Your extreme devotion is notable and noted! And hilarious!
__________________________________
So... what else can we have 'em buy into here, Manny? Gotta have sumthin' around here for a sort of spiritual yard sale, huh? Some old useless junk they'd still have to have? And true to our soiled biblical money-lender image, we can still make a bit on the side!
Hurry! Let's do it before they catch on!
_____________________________________
*"Fools are always so easily misled!"
Eusebius had some great theories on it. He placed the ark in a valley that would have filled up gently and protected it from storm conditions, have Noah invent freeze drying, and said that he took about hundreds of cuttings from plants to ensure vegetation survived.
I love the way all you pseudo-scientists love to throw around other peoples work as if it's fact without doing your own research on the issue and believing it because it is what you want to believe...Just like the sheeple that take as gospel truth those theologians that speak to what they want to hear as truth and not doing their own objective study...I see no difference between the two types...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Stulti sunt semper facile seduci *
A drizzle of pH modifier here, a tad of fertilizer there, and VOILA! Food for millions!
