Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It is not slanted to Christianity. it is the official hanbook for Christianity.
jghorton's 400 page book is the "official handbook for Christianity?" Once again you seem to have no idea what is being talked about but put out a ridiculous statement anyway. Don't quit your day job.
Rising from the dead is not being born and you neglected Jesus not being born at all.
So once again you missed the point being explained: that there is a conflict in the circumstances given in two of the descriptions of Jesus' birth which would indicate that He was born at two entirely different times.
The only advice I can give you is to actually for a change.
jghorton's 400 page book is the "official handbook for Christianity?" Once again you seem to have no idea what is being talked about but put out a ridiculous statement anyway. Don't quit your day job.
Thanks for another lay up. Some man may label his book the hand book of Christianity, but what is not inerrant can't be the official hand book of Christianity.
So once again you missed the point being explained: that there is a conflict in the circumstances given in two of the descriptions of Jesus' birth which would indicate that He was born at two entirely different times.
The only advice I can give you is to actually for a change.
Post the verses you think say that. Until you do I have no way of correcting your misunderstanding.
Post the verses you think say that. Until you do I have no way of correcting your misunderstanding.
The reference was a post made awhile back concerning the conflict on the time of Jesus' birth:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Diogenes
.....
We can calculate Herod died around 4 BC, give or take a year, from Josephus (who used eye witness accounts of Herod's biographer). Which means Jesus must have been born BEFORE then. But Luke says Jesus was born 10 years AFTER then.
.....
you can follow from there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by omega2xx
No one has put IN an actual contradiction. They claim they are contradictions because they don't know the Bible well enough to reconcile them
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Diogenes
Jesus being born twice while not being born at all. Again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by omega2xx
Rising from the dead is not being born and you neglected Jesus not being born at all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nateswift
So once again you missed the point being explained: that there is a conflict in the circumstances given in two of the descriptions of Jesus' birth which would indicate that He was born at two entirely different times.
The only advice I can give you is to actually for a change.
The reference was a post made awhile back concerning the conflict on the time of Jesus' birth:
you can follow from there.
I missed your post. Why wont you give me the post number?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
for a change.
