Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What we are finding out here, is many of those scientific facts, are not facts at all. They are only assumptions that have been dressed up, to look like facts.
Wow, look who is calling the kettle black!
Your posts contain no real science, just religious BS "that have been dressed up, to look like facts".
The myth of the Ark as related, i.e. stolen, in the Bible is simply NOT possible!
Those thing do not compute with people like Campbell.
Oh, do you mean like when we found out that in the 1980s, civilians really did have full use of the GPS system, and it's 24 satellites?
Or maybe that did not compute with people like you.
While we are still on the topic of "phrozen water", the last Ice Age was about 20,000 years ago and the AiG folk use the receding ice sheets and/or subsequent fludd of melting ice as the origins of the Grand Canyon - we of course know that this is BS due to the dated multiple layers seen to the keen observer.
which were formed by water erosion rotating withing the softer limestone and small pebbles.
In this area we have the oldest known cave called Sudwala with still active cave formations albeit very few. All these are within 100 mile radius. The reason I mention this, here in SA we are soooo far from Antarctica, the AiG explanation of glacier retreat and/or ice fludd does not work.
However it is interesting how they have one defense say for the grand canyon using retreating ice from the last Ice Age and forget that the last Ice Age far outdates their creation myth timeline of 6.035k years.
Ice, the single biggest debunker of "teh fludd" and YE creation.
Your posts contain no real science, just religious BS "that have been dressed up, to look like facts".
The myth of the Ark as related, i.e. stolen, in the Bible is simply NOT possible!
We have satellite photo interpreters, who are now telling us that there is a large man-made object high up on Mt. Ararat. And one of those interpreters personally does not believe in the Ark of Noah, so you can't say his comment is religious BS. And he tells us, the object is broken in two, and is sepearted by about 1200 feet.
Ed Davis stated for years he saw the object back in the 1940s up close, and it was broken in two, and seperated. And Davis was not the only one who saw it.
And we have another group, who with the aid of a photo interpreter used GPS numbers from a satellite and actually got a picture of one of the objects in question in 1989.
And it is man-made, and high up on the mountain of Ararat.
While we are still on the topic of "phrozen water", the last Ice Age was about 20,000 years ago and the AiG folk use the receding ice sheets and/or subsequent fludd of melting ice as the origins of the Grand Canyon - we of course know that this is BS due to the dated multiple layers seen to the keen observer.
which were formed by water erosion rotating withing the softer limestone and small pebbles.
In this area we have the oldest known cave called Sudwala with still active cave formations albeit very few. All these are within 100 mile radius. The reason I mention this, here in SA we are soooo far from Antarctica, the AiG explanation of glacier retreat and/or ice fludd does not work.
However it is interesting how they have one defense say for the grand canyon using retreating ice from the last Ice Age and forget that the last Ice Age far outdates their creation myth timeline of 6.035k years.
Ice, the single biggest debunker of "teh fludd" and YE creation.
If ice is the single debunker of the flood, why do whe have airplanes from 1943 deep in ice that would be considered to be many hundreds of years old? Only false assumptions about the age of ice, is the single biggest debunker of the flood.
Oh, do you mean like when we found out that in the 1980s, civilians really did have full use of the GPS system, and it's 24 satellites?
Or maybe that did not compute with people like you.
See what I mean mate? You have been given irrefutable, verifiable evidence that GPS was not available to the public in the 80's and that there was NO network of 24 satellites until the mid 90's but still you persist. Quite frankly my brother...I think you need help.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
