Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-22-2013, 01:32 PM
 
13,011 posts, read 13,050,479 times
Reputation: 21914

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by groar View Post
fishbrains, that's not true, people can be salaried and non-exempt. it's not common but it's possible. it's not common because it really only benefits the employee - they are paid a set amount if they work less than their normal hours, but they get overtime if they work over 40 a week.
I stand corrected. I guess one could structure a job that way.

I suspect that confusion about exempt vs. non-exempt is more likely than the Demario you propose, but I will keep this option in min pond for the future.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-22-2013, 01:56 PM
 
Location: At the corner of happy and free
6,472 posts, read 6,679,753 times
Reputation: 16346
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattywo85 View Post
If you WORK over 40 hours in a week, you should get overtime pay. They just take your salary and calculate your hourly rate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by groar View Post
he's probably exempt then.

but salary and exempt status don't always go together.

if he's non-exempt, he should sue the company for back pay. he will win.
OK, I'd better back up and clarify. I thought that mattywo85 was making a general statement based on his opinion, that if anyone works over 40 hours in a week, they deserve to get overtime pay. I agree with this, but of course that's not how it works for exempt employees. My husband IS exempt, so no, he doesn't get OT. Personally, I don't think anyone should have to work as many hours as he does. Companies wouldn't take advantage of their exempt employees, expecting 60 to 80 or more hour work weeks, if exemption from OT was not an option, and they had to actually pay overtime for all those extra hours. As it is, companies can basically get 1 person to work the hours of 2 people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2013, 02:03 PM
 
Location: At the corner of happy and free
6,472 posts, read 6,679,753 times
Reputation: 16346
Quote:
Originally Posted by groar View Post
fishbrains, that's not true, people can be salaried and non-exempt. it's not common but it's possible. it's not common because it really only benefits the employee - they are paid a set amount if they work less than their normal hours, but they get overtime if they work over 40 a week.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishbrains View Post
I stand corrected. I guess one could structure a job that way.
My son just started a position in California last week. He told me he is salaried but gets OT after 40 hours. When I expressed my surprise about that, he said it is common in California, and that it is fairly difficult to legally classify a position as "exempt."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2013, 02:04 PM
 
7,380 posts, read 15,676,948 times
Reputation: 4975
Quote:
Originally Posted by kayanne View Post
OK, I'd better back up and clarify. I thought that mattywo85 was making a general statement based on his opinion, that if anyone works over 40 hours in a week, they deserve to get overtime pay. I agree with this, but of course that's not how it works for exempt employees. My husband IS exempt, so no, he doesn't get OT. Personally, I don't think anyone should have to work as many hours as he does. Companies wouldn't take advantage of their exempt employees, expecting 60 to 80 or more hour work weeks, if exemption from OT was not an option, and they had to actually pay overtime for all those extra hours. As it is, companies can basically get 1 person to work the hours of 2 people.
oh, i don't think it's fair either. but it's the way the law works right now.

matty said later that he misspoke, he was referring to legality and he was talking about non-exempt salaried people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2013, 02:39 PM
 
2,538 posts, read 4,712,431 times
Reputation: 3357
Quote:
Originally Posted by kayanne View Post
My son just started a position in California last week. He told me he is salaried but gets OT after 40 hours. When I expressed my surprise about that, he said it is common in California, and that it is fairly difficult to legally classify a position as "exempt."
That is what I mentioned in my other posts, that it depends on the state. California is one that adds extra protections from abuse of exempt status. There was a big case involving EA a few years ago, it did not turn out well for EA. Other states have similar protections, but they're rarely enforced. In theory if you are exempt you could be forced to work 24x7x365.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2013, 02:57 PM
 
11,642 posts, read 23,913,732 times
Reputation: 12274
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishbrains View Post
You cannot be both salaried and non-exempt. A salaried person is exempt, a non-exempt person is paid hourly.
Not true. A person can be salaried non-exempt employee.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:54 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top