Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-31-2013, 08:15 PM
 
Location: Chicago Area
12,687 posts, read 6,738,099 times
Reputation: 6594

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by janelle144 View Post
If Mary had taken a vow of virginity then there is not doubt there was no human man involved and only the Holy Spirit in Jesus' conception.

One needs to find out what the culture of the day was like in Mary's time. Her parents took her to temple as a young girl and dedicated her to God. She may have lived out her life there with Joseph as her guardian. There are many things to consider outside the bible. One needs to study the culture and their traditions.
Yet the Protoevangelium of James is the best evidence I have seen anyone offer up that she did in fact take a vow of perpetual virginity. That work was denounced the fanciful invention of some unknown 2nd century writer.

Quote:
Scholars have established that the work is pseudepigraphical (not written by the person it is attributed to). That conclusion is based on the style of the language and the fact that the author describes certain activities as contemporary Jewish customs that probably did not exist. For example, the work suggests there were consecrated temple virgins in Judaism, similar to the Vestal Virgins in pagan Rome, this is unlikely to have been a practice in mainstream Judaism.

The consensus is that the Protoevangelium of James was actually composed some time in the 2nd century AD.
One of the biggest reasons that the Protoevangelium of James was and is rejected by scholars is the very fact that no such custom of "sacred virgins" existed in the Rabbinical Jewish culture that Mary would have grown up in.

The appearance of the notion that Mary was a perpetual virgin is most likely because of the very pagan Roman practice of consecrating Vestal Virgins. Any right-headed Christian scholar knows that modern Christianity and its customs have derived largely from a merging of paganism and the original Christian religion. By adopting many popular trappings of the various pagan religions, Christianity's growth was greatly accelerated. Bunnies and eggs at Easter. Evergreens at Christmas. All pagan stuff modified for Christian consumption. The fact that the notions of the immaculate conception and subsequent perpetual virginity started to appear about 150 years after the fact -- just as the Church is desperately struggling to grow and be accepted within the Roman Empire -- makes this by far the most likely source of the presumed perpetual virginity of Mary.

The Protoevangelium of James was rejected as pious fiction by the Church when the canon of the New Testament was adopted. How does it follow that it is a reliable source on matters about the life of Mary?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-31-2013, 09:00 PM
 
19,942 posts, read 17,198,967 times
Reputation: 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by janelle144 View Post
Not everything is contained in scripture. There are other books that explain the time and culture.
If youre going to make up a doctrine such as Mary's perpetual virginity that directly contradicts what scripture,says, I think thats an issue. It's one thing if scripture was silent on it.,,,,but its not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2013, 10:29 PM
 
Location: Fishers, IN
6,485 posts, read 12,539,085 times
Reputation: 4126
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vizio View Post
If youre going to make up a doctrine such as Mary's perpetual virginity that directly contradicts what scripture,says, I think thats an issue. It's one thing if scripture was silent on it.,,,,but its not.
It's not that it's silent. It's just not clear.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2013, 11:25 PM
 
12,030 posts, read 9,346,714 times
Reputation: 2848
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vizio View Post
If youre going to make up a doctrine such as Mary's perpetual virginity that directly contradicts what scripture,says, I think thats an issue. It's one thing if scripture was silent on it.,,,,but its not.
Catholics do not follow Sola Scriptura.

The CC is guided by the Holy Spirit and if the Church says Mary remained a virgin then it means the Church made this decision guided by the Holy Spirit.

For Protestants it all ended after the Apostles were gone. OTHO, the CC remains alive under the guidance of the Holy Spirit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2014, 02:13 AM
 
23,654 posts, read 17,517,565 times
Reputation: 7472
The bible is not clear on many things. I thought Mary was an only child since her parents were elderly when they had her but when the women went to Jesus' tomb it says among the women was Mary and her sister Mary.

So when they say James and Jesus' brother James I am not quite sure what they mean. Plus Jesus gave Mary to John from the cross to take care of her and Mary went to live with John. If she had other children that wasn't necessary.

Reading some novels can get me mixed up as well. Some of the characters have a lot of nick names and I find it impossible sometimes to keep them all separate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2014, 02:46 AM
 
650 posts, read 514,256 times
Reputation: 53
the salvation of the world was dependent on Mary's consent.

Mary replies to the angel 'behold the handmaiden of the lord' . the answer which drew the only begotten son from the father. ( servant.

Saint Bonaventure writes the greatest grace which could be conferred and continues, God could make a greater world, a greater heaven but could not exalt a creature more then by making her his Mother.

there would be no one who is not God, who can be compared to Mary. ( St Andrew of Crete.

Last edited by alexcanter; 01-01-2014 at 03:18 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2014, 02:18 PM
 
Location: Clanton, AL
668 posts, read 690,941 times
Reputation: 81
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julian658 View Post
Catholics do not follow Sola Scriptura.

The CC is guided by the Holy Spirit and if the Church says Mary remained a virgin then it means the Church made this decision guided by the Holy Spirit.

For Protestants it all ended after the Apostles were gone. OTHO, the CC remains alive under the guidance of the Holy Spirit.
At least you give bit's of truth with the error you have been told you must accept. The RCC is not guided by God's word or Holy Spirit. And you accept what some man made up about Mary which God's proves is false.

As for the Protestants you keep bringing up, I cannot comment. I have not been around them enough to know. I only know what Christians believe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2014, 03:00 PM
 
12,030 posts, read 9,346,714 times
Reputation: 2848
Quote:
Originally Posted by FundamentalBibleBeliever View Post
At least you give bit's of truth with the error you have been told you must accept. The RCC is not guided by God's word or Holy Spirit. And you accept what some man made up about Mary which God's proves is false.

As for the Protestants you keep bringing up, I cannot comment. I have not been around them enough to know. I only know what Christians believe.
I accept what religions teach. I hang out with Jews and Muslims and I would never say my religion is better than theirs. However, if they ask: I would say that MAry is supposed to be a perpetual virgin according to my Catholicism. Whether it is true or not is a moot point because we will never know. Furthermore, this is RELIGION.

You may think you are above the arguments of others by even denying the Protestants. But, at the same time you unknowingly defend Protestantism which in itself is OK.

You remind me of another poster who elevates himself because he does not believe he is practicing a religion.

The basic difference between you and me is that you actually believe you have it right and that I am wrong. And we are discussing RELIGION! You have got to be kidding me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2014, 09:39 PM
 
Location: Clanton, AL
668 posts, read 690,941 times
Reputation: 81
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julian658 View Post
I only know I know nothing.


I cannot understand someone like you who thinks he knows.

That is the issue.

As for the Virgin Mary: She is better off as a perpetual virgin because she is the mother of God.

By the way: Do you thin Jesus was a virgin?
Moderator cut: deleted

Well I know Mary was only a virgin until Jesus was born. God made it a point to tell us that. I do not know if Jesus remained a virgin or was married. We are not told that. Some want to say He was married but there is no conclusive comments in scripture unlike the fact that Mary and Joseph had sex. That's a cut and dried fact according to scripture.

I suspect God knew there would be those who would try an elevate Mary to a position she does not hold and included it in scripture to disprove that teaching.

Last edited by june 7th; 01-02-2014 at 04:53 AM.. Reason: Insults directed at other members are deleted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2014, 10:01 PM
 
12,030 posts, read 9,346,714 times
Reputation: 2848
Quote:
Originally Posted by FundamentalBibleBeliever View Post
Well I hope you know something. I realize, and thank God you do to, you don't know much about God and His church. Perhaps that is why God sent me to you.

Well I know Mary was only a virgin until Jesus was born. God made it a point to tell us that. I do not know if Jesus remained a virgin or was married. We are not told that. Some want to say He was married but there is no conclusive comments in scripture unlike the fact that Mary and Joseph had sex. That's a cut and dried fact according to scripture.

I suspect God knew there would be those who would try an elevate Mary to a position she does not hold and included it in scripture to disprove that teaching.
Do you go to church?

Where did you get all this stuff?

As fort Mary: She is not a goddess. She is simply the mother of Jesus, who according to the trinity is God. Those that pray to Mary should know they are indirectly praying to God. She is just a intermediary.

Have you ever been to a Catholic mass?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top