Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Happy Mother`s Day to all Moms!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-11-2015, 08:14 AM
 
Location: New England
37,340 posts, read 28,334,160 times
Reputation: 2747

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by bawac34618 View Post
If homosexuality is such an important issue, why didn't Jesus ever address it? Some conservatives will say he actually did when he said "Haven't you read," he replied, "that at the beginning the Creator 'made them male and female?" but beyond that passive reference to marriage as between a man and a woman, he never mentioned homosexuality. If it really is a nation-destroying sin on the level that most evangelicals today believe it to be, why didn't Jesus give in more attention? You would think something this big, something so evil that God will completely wipe away an entire society for simply tolerating would at least have been mentioned. Something that significant wouldn't be simply implied, it would be clarified. It isn't like homosexuality wasn't practiced in the Roman world. It was. It was probably more widespread during that era than it has been any time since until the current era.

Paul addressed it in the letter to the Romans, but outside of that one mention, there isn't an explicit mention of homosexuality in the entire New Testament. Being that this seems to be one of the central issues of fundamentalist Christianity in 2015, you would think it would be one of the central issues of the New Testament yet I don't see it.

Thoughts?
Jesus did not come to address sin, call it out or categorize what was and what wasn't sin, but he did expose it in the fundamentalists, purely because of their hypocrisy...... Look you bunch of hypocrites if you look at a woman to lust after her you have committed adultery, so quit judging folk who have actually performed the act. In other words i am here to even the playing field and play by my rules.......... I am here in the name of forgiveness, mercy, love and grace, and i have all of it in abundance. He came to show us the heart of the Father and that the Father is not mad with us, but desires us to return to him, recognize who you are to him so that you no longer live a life of frustration by missing the mark. This is the Jesus Christ of the bible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-11-2015, 12:16 PM
 
Location: Gaston, North Carolina
4,213 posts, read 5,841,574 times
Reputation: 634
Quote:
Originally Posted by DewDropInn View Post
Was that a personal revelation?

Care to share the details?
No not a personal revelation, merely guidance thru the Word of God and all faithful can see the same if they just put self aside.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wardendresden View Post
The Holy Spirit told me just the opposite. I like the one that loves everybody and doesn't leave out homosexuals or anyone else. Your holy spirit is too fickle.
Actually the Holy Spirit that guides me does the same, but He does expect repentance of sins.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2015, 12:57 PM
 
Location: Southern Oregon
17,071 posts, read 10,939,403 times
Reputation: 1874
Quote:
Originally Posted by twin.spin View Post
Maybe you didn't get the point Jesus was making or wantonly not willing to, in either case when Jesus said what he did, he in fact is saying that yes evildoers do NOT act out of the love ... love for God and the Truth and so are justly damned\condemned for it.

Jesus makes it very plain that evildoers do NOT act out of the love when he says:
"Outside are the dogs, those who practice magic arts, the sexually immoral, the murderers, the idolaters and everyone who loves and practices falsehood." ~ Jesus
Maybe you missed MY point: You said those verses refuted my claim of a paradigm shift from law to love as basis for conduct and judgement. The ONLY way it would do so is if those evildoers were acting out of love. They were NOT, paradigm shift stands. Judgement is about what is in their hearts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2015, 02:46 PM
 
63,901 posts, read 40,178,831 times
Reputation: 7884
Quote:
Originally Posted by nateswift View Post
Maybe you missed MY point: You said those verses refuted my claim of a paradigm shift from law to love as basis for conduct and judgement. The ONLY way it would do so is if those evildoers were acting out of love. They were NOT, paradigm shift stands. Judgement is about what is in their hearts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2015, 02:47 PM
 
63,901 posts, read 40,178,831 times
Reputation: 7884
Default Why didn't Jesus address homosexuality?

Because sex is not spiritual, it is carnal. Jesus is our spiritual leader and example.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2015, 02:55 PM
 
Location: In a little house on the prairie - literally
10,202 posts, read 7,937,486 times
Reputation: 4561
Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticPhD View Post
Because sex is not spiritual, it is carnal. Jesus is our spiritual leader and example.
I'm not so sure about that.

I've had more than a few partners invoke incantations to some deity while being involved in carnal knowledge with me. And enthusiastically so
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2015, 07:39 PM
 
15,706 posts, read 11,790,629 times
Reputation: 7020
I think Jesus did say people like gays are born that way in Matthew 19.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2015, 07:42 PM
 
Location: Townsville
6,803 posts, read 2,924,251 times
Reputation: 5536
Quote:
Originally Posted by RomulusXXV
Do you honestly believe that Adam and Eve are prime examples of what a marriage and child-rearing should be all about.

Fail!

Oh, I should also mention that A&E were not married as far as we know.

As for your "not messing with marriage as God created it" ...you're surely not serious, are you? Biblical marriage completely disregards the woman (she being the property of the male) and present-day marriages that result in a 50% divorce rate certainly indicate that people are doing a fine job of "messing with marriage as God created it" ...!

Or, is homosexuality the cause for heterosexuals jumping out of their "God-ordained' marriages?

Why would Jesus have taken the opportunity to include homosexuality in His answer to a question asked of Him by His opponents with regard to divorce BETWEEN a man and a woman? That WOULD have been not only weird but also totally irrelevant!
Quote:
Originally Posted by TroutDude View Post
Best not trouble Viz with facts. They upset him. He can't digest them. Lack of an enzyme or something, I'm not sure. I'm a writer, not a doctor.
I couldn't let this one go by without at least a just as you did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2015, 07:45 PM
 
Location: Townsville
6,803 posts, read 2,924,251 times
Reputation: 5536
Quote:
Originally Posted by RomulusXXV
Do you honestly believe that Adam and Eve are prime examples of what a marriage and child-rearing should be all about.

Fail!

Oh, I should also mention that A&E were not married as far as we know.

As for your "not messing with marriage as God created it" ...you're surely not serious, are you? Biblical marriage completely disregards the woman (she being the property of the male) and present-day marriages that result in a 50% divorce rate certainly indicate that people are doing a fine job of "messing with marriage as God created it" ...!

Or, is homosexuality the cause for heterosexuals jumping out of their "God-ordained' marriages?

Why would Jesus have taken the opportunity to include homosexuality in His answer to a question asked of Him by His opponents with regard to divorce BETWEEN a man and a woman? That WOULD have been not only weird but also totally irrelevant!
Quote:
Originally Posted by DewDropInn View Post
I'm happy to be able to rep you on this one, Romulus.
Why, thank you . . .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2015, 08:00 PM
 
32,516 posts, read 37,221,051 times
Reputation: 32581
Quote:
Originally Posted by RomulusXXV View Post
Why, thank you . . .
Keep educating people. You never know who might just have a light bulb moment. Probably none of the ardently anti-gay posters on this forum. Personally, I'm convinced they LIKE walking around with a bag over their heads. But you never know who is out there in the ether. And you never know which, and how many, lives will be changed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top