Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It is only possible by ignoring or pretending that there are no contradictions or inconsistencies within them. That is definitely irrational. Refusing to eliminate the dross from within scripture and retain only the truth is the main failing of mainstream Christianity.
And yet we still wait to hear about these inconsistencies. So please go to you favorite anti Christian blog and post your favorite inconsistency
I would take that as a warning not to listen to people who use the words in a book to justify harm and exclusion of others. Because that's not what Jesus said to do.
Oh, you must definitely exclude others. God in Three persons are in total harmony and agreement because they are perfect. God of the Old Testament and Jesus are of the same thought.
And the God of the Old Testament said homosexuality is an abomination.
(I am sure there will be great pearl clutching after this truth)
Some have been presented and dutifully ignored by you. How DO you feel about expressions of satisfaction at bashing babies' heads?
Everyone is welcome in Jesus’ Church including murderers, rapiists, liars, thieves, the idolatrous.... But you CANNOT glorify and promote your sin.
I don’t know if one of our sins is greater than the other. But I think the 1st Commandment is 1st on the list for a reason. And that is why I keep tellling you in different ways that “YOU ARE IN DANGER!!!”
Everyone is welcome in Jesus’ Church including murderers, rapiists, liars, thieves, the idolatrous.... But you CANNOT glorify and promote your sin.
I don’t know if one of our sins is greater than the other. But I think the 1st Commandment is 1st on the list for a reason. And that is why I keep tellling you in different ways that “YOU ARE IN DANGER!!!”
So, am I to understand that the Psalm that glorifies the idea of bashing the heads of the babies of their enemies is contrary to the Spirit Christ taught?
So, am I to understand that the Psalm that glorifies the idea of bashing the heads of the babies of their enemies is contrary to the Spirit Christ taught?
God is the Creator of everything. And He has authority who lives and dies. That being said the Psalmist is not God. The Psalmists is speaking in terms for an eye for an eye as in retaliation for what happen to the Hebrew children.
Your willful refusal just to do a bit of research is extremely worrisome.
Ever noticed that God never sanctified the action of Abraham for being with another woman? You should reflect on this.
And yet we still wait to hear about these inconsistencies. So please go to your favorite anti-Christian blog and post your favorite inconsistency
I AM Christian, so I am NOT anti-Christian. "There are none so blind as they who will not see." Your excuses and rationalizations for the contradictions and inconsistencies are ludicrous and defy all reason. They are unnecessary when you know God as revealed and demonstrated unambiguously by Jesus.
I AM Christian, so I am NOT anti-Christian. "There are none so blind as they who will not see." Your excuses and rationalizations for the contradictions and inconsistencies are ludicrous and defy all reason. They are unnecessary when you know God as revealed and demonstrated unambiguously by Jesus.
Unambiguously? I think not, if you have to discern what letters in red are real and what’s fake.
I AM Christian, so I am NOT anti-Christian. "There are none so blind as they who will not see." Your excuses and rationalizations for the contradictions and inconsistencies are ludicrous and defy all reason. They are unnecessary when you know God as revealed and demonstrated unambiguously by Jesus.
If someone denies main parts of the Bible that was fully inspired by the Holy Spirit, how can they know who God is?
I'm really not all that interested in getting involved in this discussion except to ask you one question: This is the first time I've heard someone specify that there are "main parts" of the Bible (as opposed, I suppose to "secondary" or "lesser") parts of the Bible and that they were "fully inspired by the Holy Spirit" (as opposed to being just "partially inspired" or possibly "not inspired at all"). Would you mind clarifying which parts of the Bible are the "main, fully inspired" parts. Oh, and while you're at it, could you explain who got to make the determination? I'm curious as to which parts I can safely deny without having to worry about being eternally damned.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It is only possible by ignoring or pretending that there are no contradictions or inconsistencies within them. That is definitely irrational. Refusing to eliminate the dross from within scripture and retain only the truth is the main failing of mainstream Christianity.
