Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: More economically relevant state in the future
California 195 56.85%
Texas 148 43.15%
Voters: 343. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-07-2013, 01:47 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,515 posts, read 33,527,366 times
Reputation: 12152

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Folks3000 View Post
Texas has a few mountains over by El Paso, I'd hardly call the topography of Texas exciting. Varied climates? What blazing hot and humid and blazing hot and dry? Your deserts? We have Death Valley, the hottest place on Earth. Your coastline? It will never compare to Big Sur. Silicon Hills will never be Silicon Valley. UT-Austin will never be UC-Berkeley or UCLA. You think Houston is big and booming? Greater SF is bigger, denser, and more diverse. Greater LA is almost the size of the entire Texas Triangle combined by population. If Texas was as expensive as California, nobody would move there. While people in Texas debate whether the moon is lit from light reflecting off the Sun because that goes against the Bible, people in California are advancing science and technology for the entire world. Now I'll admit, Texas is a better place to live than a lot of other states. It is a decently nice state. But the arrogance of Texans to think that there state is somehow comparable or more relevant than California is astounding. Texas is like the annoying little step-brother that California holds back with one hand as he swings wildly in the air. The funny part is while the Texas governor takes shots at California all day long, nobody in California even cares or notices. All the rhetoric in Texas holds on to the perceived hope of California's failure. Hoping companies will move from there, hoping California will collapse, etc. Do you ever hear people in California saying "Oh I hope Dell or Exxon will move to California from Texas" or anything like that? No! Texas isn't even on California's radar. I think that is the most telling difference.
Well I can't find much to disagree with but didn't pay much attention to the outright bashing part. Though it also annoys the hell out of me when Texans talk about companies moving there from California especially the conversation about Chevron comes up. I do disagree that the Bay Area is more diverse than Houston. I think they both are about equal if anything. Texas needs to focus on improving and stop trying to compare itself to everything. It's annoying and arrogant. Also, 2014 is Rick Perry's last year. I would still choose Texas over the vast majority of states though.

Last edited by Spade; 11-07-2013 at 02:00 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-07-2013, 01:54 PM
 
Location: San Antonio
282 posts, read 472,036 times
Reputation: 363
Right now, Texas still has catching up to do. But at the rate Texas is moving, it might be much sooner than expected when Texas can go toe-to-toe with Cali.

Texas bashing is like second nature on here it seems. So funny how uninformed you people are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2013, 02:06 PM
 
Location: Upper East Side of Texas
12,498 posts, read 26,986,110 times
Reputation: 4890
Quote:
Originally Posted by Folks3000 View Post
Texas has a few mountains over by El Paso, I'd hardly call the topography of Texas exciting. Varied climates? What blazing hot and humid and blazing hot and dry? Your deserts? We have Death Valley, the hottest place on Earth. Your coastline? It will never compare to Big Sur. Silicon Hills will never be Silicon Valley. UT-Austin will never be UC-Berkeley or UCLA. You think Houston is big and booming? Greater SF is bigger, denser, and more diverse. Greater LA is almost the size of the entire Texas Triangle combined by population. If Texas was as expensive as California, nobody would move there. While people in Texas debate whether the moon is lit from light reflecting off the Sun because that goes against the Bible, people in California are advancing science and technology for the entire world. Now I'll admit, Texas is a better place to live than a lot of other states. It is a decently nice state. But the arrogance of Texans to think that there state is somehow comparable or more relevant than California is astounding. Texas is like the annoying little step-brother that California holds back with one hand as he swings wildly in the air. The funny part is while the Texas governor takes shots at California all day long, nobody in California even cares or notices. All the rhetoric in Texas holds on to the perceived hope of California's failure. Hoping companies will move from there, hoping California will collapse, etc. Do you ever hear people in California saying "Oh I hope Dell or Exxon will move to California from Texas" or anything like that? No! Texas isn't even on California's radar. I think that is the most telling difference.
Keep dreaming.

LA's MSA is as large as Houston + D/FW combined only. That's not including San Antonio or Austin's metropolitan areas.

Some of you California homers truly amaze me.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2013, 02:18 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,515 posts, read 33,527,366 times
Reputation: 12152
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro Matt View Post
Keep dreaming.

LA's MSA is as large as Houston + D/FW combined only. That's not including San Antonio or Austin's metropolitan areas.

Some of you California homers truly amaze me.

I assume he is talking about CSA. If so, well LA is around 18 million. Dallas/Houston/Austin/San Antonio together does not reach that population. Now you have to take into account of the rest of the smaller cities inside the triangle such as Waco/Killeen/Bryan. But that's only about an extra 3 million. So in essence, he's correct only if he's talking about LA plus the inland empire.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2013, 02:22 PM
 
Location: Upper East Side of Texas
12,498 posts, read 26,986,110 times
Reputation: 4890
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spade View Post
I assume he is talking about CSA. If so, well LA is around 18 million. Dallas/Houston/Austin/San Antonio together does not reach that population. Now you have to take into account of the rest of the smaller cities inside the triangle such as Waco/Killeen/Bryan. But that's only about an extra 3 million. So in essence, he's correct only if he's talking about LA plus the inland empire.
MSA is the correct way to measure not CSA.

San Antonio, San Diego, & Phoenix don't even have a CSA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2013, 03:01 PM
 
556 posts, read 715,197 times
Reputation: 438
Quote:
Originally Posted by &heart View Post
Right now, Texas still has catching up to do. But at the rate Texas is moving, it might be much sooner than expected when Texas can go toe-to-toe with Cali.

Texas bashing is like second nature on here it seems. So funny how uninformed you people are.
Not really, because Texans always assume because they are "moving fast" that California is also "standing still." It isn't, and if anything the growth rate of Texas is likely to slow down long before it is close to California once cost of living starts to rise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2013, 03:03 PM
 
556 posts, read 715,197 times
Reputation: 438
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro Matt View Post
Keep dreaming.

LA's MSA is as large as Houston + D/FW combined only. That's not including San Antonio or Austin's metropolitan areas.

Some of you California homers truly amaze me.

1) THIS is my favorite part. You assume that I must BE from California to be defending it! I'm not! I'd rather live in Texas than a whole bunch of states, but I'm not going to pretend that Texas can ever be comparable to California.

2) LA's CSA is over 17 million. So.... Yea.... I also said almost.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2013, 03:04 PM
 
556 posts, read 715,197 times
Reputation: 438
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro Matt View Post
MSA is the correct way to measure not CSA.

San Antonio, San Diego, & Phoenix don't even have a CSA.
That is because they don't have any neighboring MSAs that are related to the central city by commuter patterns. CSA is another census stat just like any other. As long as we compare apples to apples they are legitimate.

Last edited by Folks3000; 11-07-2013 at 03:30 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2013, 03:05 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
10,078 posts, read 15,851,756 times
Reputation: 4049
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro Matt View Post
MSA is the correct way to measure not CSA.

San Antonio, San Diego, & Phoenix don't even have a CSA.
The thing is that poster was comparing a large region of Texas to a general region of Southern California. In this instance, I think it is fair to include the Inland Empire to Los Angeles.

You cannot argue the fact that Los Angeles + Inland Empire > All those Texas cities in population. I guess you can say that is an unfair comparison for some reason, but you cannot say it is untrue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2013, 03:13 PM
 
556 posts, read 715,197 times
Reputation: 438
Texas will catch California, in and around the year 2202!!!!! Let us just hypothetically pretend that the numerical gains going on in Texas continue at the same high rate they are today. If we extrapolate the population of both states given their current population growth, we get the following table. Good luck with the whole "toe-to-toe" with California thing, unless you mean in a couple centuries lol.

California Texas
2010 37,253,956 25,145,561
2012 38,041,430 26,059,203
2014 38,828,904 26,972,845
2016 39,616,378 27,886,487
2018 40,403,852 28,800,129
2020 41,191,326 29,713,771
2022 41,978,800 30,627,413
2024 42,766,274 31,541,055
2026 43,553,748 32,454,697
2028 44,341,222 33,368,339
2030 45,128,696 34,281,981
2032 45,916,170 35,195,623
2034 46,703,644 36,109,265
2036 47,491,118 37,022,907
2038 48,278,592 37,936,549
2040 49,066,066 38,850,191
2042 49,853,540 39,763,833
2044 50,641,014 40,677,475
2046 51,428,488 41,591,117
2048 52,215,962 42,504,759
2050 53,003,436 43,418,401
2052 53,790,910 44,332,043
2054 54,578,384 45,245,685
2056 55,365,858 46,159,327
2058 56,153,332 47,072,969
2060 56,940,806 47,986,611
2062 57,728,280 48,900,253
2064 58,515,754 49,813,895
2066 59,303,228 50,727,537
2068 60,090,702 51,641,179
2070 60,878,176 52,554,821
2072 61,665,650 53,468,463
2074 62,453,124 54,382,105
2076 63,240,598 55,295,747
2078 64,028,072 56,209,389
2080 64,815,546 57,123,031
2082 65,603,020 58,036,673
2084 66,390,494 58,950,315
2086 67,177,968 59,863,957
2088 67,965,442 60,777,599
2090 68,752,916 61,691,241
2092 69,540,390 62,604,883
2094 70,327,864 63,518,525
2096 71,115,338 64,432,167
2098 71,902,812 65,345,809
2100 72,690,286 66,259,451
2102 73,477,760 67,173,093
2104 74,265,234 68,086,735
2106 75,052,708 69,000,377
2108 75,840,182 69,914,019
2110 76,627,656 70,827,661
2112 77,415,130 71,741,303
2114 78,202,604 72,654,945
2116 78,990,078 73,568,587
2118 79,777,552 74,482,229
2120 80,565,026 75,395,871
2122 81,352,500 76,309,513
2124 82,139,974 77,223,155
2126 82,927,448 78,136,797
2128 83,714,922 79,050,439
2130 84,502,396 79,964,081
2132 85,289,870 80,877,723
2134 86,077,344 81,791,365
2136 86,864,818 82,705,007
2138 87,652,292 83,618,649
2140 88,439,766 84,532,291
2142 89,227,240 85,445,933
2144 90,014,714 86,359,575
2146 90,802,188 87,273,217
2148 91,589,662 88,186,859
2150 92,377,136 89,100,501
2152 93,164,610 90,014,143
2154 93,952,084 90,927,785
2156 94,739,558 91,841,427
2158 95,527,032 92,755,069
2160 96,314,506 93,668,711
2162 97,101,980 94,582,353
2164 97,889,454 95,495,995
2166 98,676,928 96,409,637
2168 99,464,402 97,323,279
2170 100,251,876 98,236,921
2172 101,039,350 99,150,563
2174 101,826,824 100,064,205
2176 102,614,298 100,977,847
2178 103,401,772 101,891,489
2180 104,189,246 102,805,131
2182 104,976,720 103,718,773
2184 105,764,194 104,632,415
2186 106,551,668 105,546,057
2188 107,339,142 106,459,699
2190 108,126,616 107,373,341
2192 108,914,090 108,286,983
2194 109,701,564 109,200,625
2196 110,489,038 110,114,267
2198 111,276,512 111,027,909
2200 112,063,986 111,941,551
2202 112,851,460 112,855,193
2204 113,638,934 113,768,835
2206 114,426,408 114,682,477
2208 115,213,882 115,596,119
2210 116,001,356 116,509,761
2212 116,788,830 117,423,403
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top